The way in which we teach our kids is one of the most important issues we face today. Most parents want what’s best for their kids and that starts with education. Education is a major factor and some people have different beliefs. The children that are currently in schools right now will someday be running this country. Education plays a big role in teaching kids, bringing kids together, and making our world better. In order to teach students in the best way possible we must do what is best for them. Putting the students first should always be the main priority. Providing equal and productive education is a way to help our children succeed. The option is whether or not we want our kids to be in classes with the opposite gender or have classes …show more content…
In order to move forward with equality we must avoid any option that will create gender stereotyping. When teachers believe that boys and girls need to be taught differently, they can end up reinforcing gender stereotypes instead of fighting them. This is a problem that we can easily fix by teaching our teachers that students are more alike than different and that they must be treated like that. When teachers try and say that genders learn differently and need to be split up because of it I don’t understand at all why that would help gender discrimination. Kristin Maschka talks in her article, “Single-Sex Schools and Gender Stereotypes,” about discrimination problems. Maschka speaks her mind about the problems that single-gender schools can cause on our youth. She writes, “Can you imagine anyone today advocating in earnest for public schools or classrooms to be segregated by race? By sexual orientation? By socio-economic status? Why are we okay with segregating by gender?” to show how important this problem is (Maschka). It does no good to separate genders. Separating genders will cause nothing but more division between the genders. In a study they found that there is no evidence of single-gender schools succeeding simply because it is divided by gender. But, they did find that separating students legitimizes institutionalized sexism
It is an area of diversity and difference with minimal awareness and often is deeply ingrained within the way educators treat girls and boys and too what they expect from them. Often unbeknown, educators assign tasks to their students according to their gender, for example, boys being asked to carry heavy sports equipment and girls being asked to tidy the chairs (National Union of Teachers, 2013, p. 6). In conjunction to this often-unintended stereotypical behaviour, educators also can habitually speak to girls and boys differently by altering their dialogue and the tone of the language (National Union of Teachers, 2013, p. 6). These behaviours can unknowingly contribute to the segregation of genders and negatively reinforce gender expectations. The educator who actively promotes gender equality demonstrates an understanding of diversity and difference. These educators will break down and challenge their students’ assumptions and objections of gender expectations. On top of this, educators should adopt a language code that does not discriminate nor highlight differences between genders. Ultimately, an educator with an understanding of diversity and difference will take the views of sex-role socialisation theory and post-structuralist feminists which both accept and view each child’s’ behaviour as individual (MacNaughton,
Sending a child to a gender based school, is a very big decision to make. The decision is so big, that looking at what research has to say about the topic could alter one’s decision to send their child to a gender based school. “Educators must apply different approaches in teaching make, and female students” (Gurian). This is said by Gurian, because he also believes that boys and girls learn differently. “Social pressures can be gentler and your child can learn at his own pace” (Kennedy).
Also, teachers can focus on gender issues facing young females today, such as body concerns as well as focusing on more challenging subjects for young girls. Through studies made from various single-sex female schools, as well as the research made through comparisons to coeducational schools, the belief that single-sex school as being a bad idea is shown to be not only incorrect, but also a completely misguided belief.
Should the clothes you wear affect how you are viewed in society? Could you imagine life where you are judged by people based on what you wear? School is the place where everyone receives knowledgeable lessons, ladders to the future, unforgettable memories and more. Therefore, schools should be treated as a temple because it is a pure and precious place to secure every individual life and future. School is the place where a variety of people get together, met up, share the many diverse religions, and ethnicities background. Some come from decent families, and some from the poor backgrounds. So, it is the school’s duty to give fair treatment to every student and make them feel no less than any other. One of the biggest factors that comes in
To refute these claims it should be noted that experienced teachers usually understand gender differences and are adept at accommodating a variety of learning styles within their classroom. Students will one day live and work side-by-side with members of the opposite sex, educating students in single-sex schools limits their opportunity to work cooperatively and co-exist with members of the opposite sex.
Lane Bryant and Ashley Stewart both feature plus size women apparel that includes intimates & swimsuit, shoes & accessories, dresses, jeans, tops, and coats. The women in both websites are portrayed to wear sizes ranging from at least a fourteen up to a twenty-eight. The women show they are comfortable with their skin with a high level of confidence. Both websites have the women portrayed as a beautiful inspiration to other ladies.
A schools most crucial factor is the efficiency of its education system. This is the ability the school possesses in order to ensure that its students reach the best of their ability and achieve high grades. Single sex schooling through recent studies has shown that there may be fewer educational advancements from separating sexes, as once thought. It is an important point to take into consideration that most, if not ...
This results of this study supported the hypothesis that girls will display more AS behaviour than boys, and that AS boys will confer greater risk of peer exclusion over time.
In 1993, American University professors Myra Sadker and David Sadker published their research in Failing in Fairness: How America’s Schools Cheat Girls, which pointed out key differences of how teachers treated students in the classroom. These included the teachers praising the boys over the girls, giving more attention to the male gender than female. So by separating the genders, there is less discrimination, and more focus on teaching single sex students. Without boys in their classes, girls are more likely to be leaders and reach higher levels of achievement, which leads to greater self-confidence and higher professional aspirations. And without girls in the classroom, boys are less distracted from the academic works, and make higher grades in the single sex environment. On a Washington Parent post, an argument supporting single sex education states, “Single-sex education encourages children to take risks in expressing themselves as they learn without the fear of embarrassing themselves in front of the opposite sex.” Being exposed to the opposite sex can be quite uncomfortable and even humiliating for some students, especially if there is the chance that your child could turn out to be
Additionally, after a student’s school life is over, distractions will impact their lives tremendously anyway. Why do school districts want to separate boys and girls if it will help them prepare for the future? Often times in classes, when someone needs help, the teacher will be a great help. However, occasionally when a teacher does not know the answer to your question or is absent, someone else can offer assistance. Even if someone of the opposite gender is this person, risking the interruptions and diversions are worth the learning experience.
Imagine your life with only members of your gender. Not all the time of course. Just during your school day or even part of your school day. Same sex classrooms would make that imagination your reality. Before you turn down the idea, because god forbid you go a few hours without seeing a cute boy take a moment to learn about all the benefits same sex schooling can provide. Most students are against same sex schools. They want to flirt with the cute guy in math or ask the shy girl in history for a pencil even if they already one. Same sex classrooms provide a multitude of benefits, because they promote better behavior, higher grades, improved self-esteem, and are able to cater to student’s needs.
The proponents of single-sex education argue that boys and girls have differing needs and that their styles of learning are different. Education which respects personal differences must take this into account. ( Mullins 124) Single-gender schools seem logical, than, to a public that accepts that gender differences are real and likes the idea of expanding choices. (Silv...
First of all, boys and girls need to be educated together because the situation they work together is more like that in our society. It is essential that they should be taught to deal with the opposite sex, as they will be submerged in a co-ed environment for the rest of their lives. "It is very sad to make students feel that mixing with the opposite sex is immoral and that they cannot be trusted to be with one another." (Elias) When you separate them in childhood, they learn that boys and girls need to be separated because they 're different. This advocates different treatments of the genders and instills an expectation that...
First students should be taught in separate classrooms because it prevents gender distractions. When children grow up having other students in a different gender causes distractions. According to the text, it states instead of focusing on the material that is being taught students are focusing on their feelings and physical reactions to the opposite gender. Parents won't have to be called or students won't get in trouble because of single
Mixed schools reflect the diversity in the society and promote the fight against sexism. As such, they are progressive because they facilitate the society to forget initially afflicted it. On the other hand, Pahlke, Bigler and Patterson argue that single-sex schools act as a throwback to the society since they remind the society of its past whereby only men were allowed to access modest education (265). Separating female students may act as a reminder of the painful past and negatively result in poor performance at school. In addition, the continued establishment of same-sex schools may affect the progress that has already been made. In order to prevent such a situation, parents should be encouraged to take their children to mixed schools. This may act as an effort of trying to move away from the past that was coupled with segregation and