Gasland Film Analysis

1280 Words3 Pages

The oil and gas industry has been met with increasing opposition over the years, with fracking and water pollution being some of the most controversial subjects alongside others like pollution, global warming, and claims of corruption. While some anti-frack claims seem like viable arguments, many are the product of misconceptions, an uninformed public. One of the greatest examples of this is Josh Fox’s 2010 documentary GasLand, whose most memorable scene showed a man in Fort Lupton, Colorado, lighting his faucet on fire, blaming it on hydraulic fracturing. After the film was released, among numerous errors it contained, it was found that the water well contained naturally occurring biogenic gas unrelated to oil and gas activity (Energy In Depth). …show more content…

There are a number of points at which Fox talks about how fracture fluid contains a mix of over 596 chemicals and how they are undisclosed because they are considered proprietary. Not only do individual states mandate the full public disclosure of fluid additives, but the federal government does as well, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires that this information be kept at all well sites (Energy In Depth). Since then, it has been proven that fracture fluid is comprised almost entirely of water and sand, and typically containing less than one percent of an average of 12 components, most of which can be found around the house. Additionally, oil and gas is not the only use of fracturing, as it has also been used to access sources of water and geothermal

More about Gasland Film Analysis

Open Document