There is controversy on if officials should be able to use information they obtained from private devices or social networking sites in order to protect the community. It is believed that officials should not be able to use this data they received from these private electronics and their sources in order to protect the community. Although, some others believe officials should be able to use details they got from private devices or social networking sites.
There is a long list of reasons why this information should not be used for protection. For example, parents should be put to their job, which means they should guide their child in the correct direction. In the article Freedom Comes First by Akash Bagaria, it says, “...the role of educators is to teach, not to monitor kids outside the classroom.”An
…show more content…
A parent’s job is to monitor their child at all times available to teach and to give the child a role model that shows them what is acceptable, which means they should scold and advise when unacceptable behavior takes place. In addition, the student-teacher relationship is based on trust and this should be portrayed at all times.“There should be a level of trust between teachers and students. Trust strengthens people’s values of commitment and responsibility,” says the article Freedom Comes First, by Akash Bagaria. A teacher forcibly getting into a child’s private life can break trust. Without trust there will be no commitment to the subject in which the teacher and pupil are related in, and this leads to bad results in the student’s education progression and success of the teacher doing their job. Furthermore, looking through someone’s phone is an invasion of privacy. In the Abuse of Power article, Valinten Perez said, “People could have....pictures in there, like of their girlfriends, that they don’t want somebody else to see, and it would be an invasion of privacy not
Marilyn Frye, a feminist philosopher, discusses the idea of oppression and how it conforms people into gender roles. She claims that it is based upon membership in a group which leads to shaping, pressing, and molding individuals, both women and men.
The poem, “My Great-Grandfather’s Slaves” by Wendell Berry, illustrates the guilt felt for the sins of a man’s ancestors. The poem details the horror for the speaker’s ancestors involvement in slavery and transitions from sympathy for the slaves to feeling enslaved by his guilt. Berry uses anaphora, motif, and irony, to express the speaker’s guilt and provide a powerful atmosphere to the poem.
There are many kids that are not doing well academically at school due to a bungle parenting. Parents must check their child’s activity outside and inside the house because it is very inevitable for kids nowadays to determine and keep a close eye on their
Anthem by Ayn Rand is considered a dystopian novel. The characters live in a society where everything is bad, and they have no control over their life or destiny. The book is about a man, Equality 7-2521, who breaks all the laws of his society and dares to be different. The book is in first person and designed to seem like journal entries.
Privacy was once taken for granted in public education, but now through the 1974 law, Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act it is pushed to the forefront of the minds of every educator in the United States (Cossler, 2010). This law has paved the way for many lawsuits regarding privacy of student’s records, which have left teachers scared, undereducated and unaware of certain regulations of the law. FERPA laws provide protections for students, but also allow access of all student records to the student’s custodial parents, which in some situations has cause problems and in some cases have specifically brought clarifications of the law. Has the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act provided the much needed privacy for students or created an overboard policies?
The expansion of the Internet infrastructure across the world, has brought an increased audience. Which has provided expanded markets for businesses and exploited new opportunities. There are virtually countless social sites and media used by individuals to access and share experiences , content, insights, and perspectives. Parents today tend to believe they should spy on their kids online activity. I argue parents should respect the privacy of a child's social life and his/her internet activity.
With the advent of new computer technologies, the ease with which new information can be discovered from aggregating data sources is astounding. This technique is called computer matching. When it comes to doing research this can be an incredible source of new ideas and correlations between sets of data. However, this same technique can be applied to information about individual people. Suddenly, by pulling together disparate sources of data, private information can be learned about an individual without their knowledge or consent. If the organization that is capable of computer matching is a government, it places a lot of information in the hands of a powerful entity. A question of whether the government should have this new information is a significant one.
Give Me Liberty Patrick Henry said give me liberty or give me death. In the book Common Sense, that is the feel throughout the book and what I think the majority of the Americans that were fighting wanted along with being their motto. The second book I read called Paul Revere ’s Ride by David Fischer had that same common theme weaved through the book. I think there is a huge similarity throughout both books.
While Coben argues in favor of monitoring children's behavior online, parents should not spy on their children. When parents do this, it is an invasion of privacy which leads to distrust between children and their parents. Additionally, if parents spy on their children, the child will soon grow out of having overprotective parents who give them no privacy, that will eventually lead them to rebel.
While not always seen, overall, teenagers get far less privacy than adults do. Between schools checking through the belongings of their students without solid evidence to allow it, or parents monitoring the activity of their children online, teenagers today are subject to much of their privacy being taken away. It is true that this can sometimes be helpful in busting drug dealers or keeping teenagers from getting involved with bad habits online. However, it can also have an adverse effect, ruining the relationship between a parent and his or her child, or other relationships throughout the rest of the teenager’s life. Teenagers should be allowed more privacy, if not as much as adults have, as it will keep them less fearful, as well as help to keep their interpersonal relationships strong and their emotions in a good state.
...by inhibition of social sites and emails and this is the theme for a discussion. How far can schools go to protect their students? There has to be done a compromise between both sides. Possible solution can be seen in the future generations because they will grow up with all the preventions around them in prepared world.
Coming from Russia during the civil war between a collectivist party and capitalism, author Ayn Rand grew up under the exposure of communism. She strongly disagreed with the sentiment of socialism, thus moved to the U.S. to experience the capitalist system. Here, Rand’s books became critically acclaimed through her unique perspective and characters. The majority of these novels is heavy handed and are heavily laced with biases that depict her strong distaste of collectivism. In the particular novella Anthem, Rand gives a warning to readers about the dangers of depending on the ‘we’ of society.
If my parents decided to get a tracker and watched me what I was doing, I would not care about it at all. My parents has brought me up in a good way. My personal demeanors are neutral, and I do not have a concrete position about tracking their kids.
"Is it against your individual rights for the government to monitor your social media? This is the question that is very controversial among government officials and the people of the U.S.. Some people believe that this is unconstitutional but others think that it is necessary for keeping us safe. The government has no right to monitor people’s social media because we have the freedom of speech, it invades people’s privacy, and it is unconstitutional. The government wants to try to keep the people of the U.S. safe but they may also be invading our privacy.
These individuals feel that it is an invasion of the teenagers’ right to privacy and the development of their trustworthiness. Kay Mathieson states “only by giving children privacy will they come to see their thoughts as something that belongs to them – to which they have an exclusive right.” In the United States and according to the law, monitoring the internet usage of a minor does not break any laws and is a moral obligation of the parent. Trustworthiness is an important development of a child to learn in order to develop genuine relationships with others in the lifetime. “Not only does monitoring have the great potential to undermine the trust of the child in the parent, and thus to undermine trust in others more generally, it also has the potential to undermine the capacity of the child to be worth of trust” (Mathieson). If the parent has not already had conversations with the teenager about monitoring internet usage and the parent is not telling the child about the monitoring, there is already an issue with the development of trustworthiness in the teenager. There was already a failure of development of this skill before the internet or internet monitoring was introduced.