Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on play and child development
Essays on play and child development
What is the role of play in child development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on play and child development
Sara Smilansky is responsible for creating and distinguishing between four types of cognitive play. The four types of cognitive play are functional play, constructive play, dramatic play and formal games with rules. Smilansky distinguished these levels of play by their cognitive complexity. For example, functional play has less cognitive complexity than constructive play whereas formal games with rules has the greatest amount of cognitive complexity. Functional play can be described as the simplest of the four levels and it usually occurs during infancy. During functional play, the infant will practice a movement and or action such as throwing, rolling or kicking a ball. These actions will usually be repetitive. Constructive play is a step …show more content…
Each little girl is holding a cloth doll and they are playing with the cloth dolls in a wooden doll house. The little girl in the white sweatshirt and brown hair is actively moving the doll, making it walk, go upstairs and converse with the other doll. It seems as though the little girl mentioned is actively engaged in dramatic play. As stated before dramatic play is also known as fantasy play and or pretend play and involves fantasy situations. The little girl mentioned is using the cloth dolls and the wooden house to create a fantasy situation. She pretending that the dolls are real people, making them communicate and interact with one another. The young girl appears to also be engaged in cooperative or organized supplementary play because she is creating a fantasy situation and environment with the dolls but is doing it with another little girl. The girls are communicating with one another and taking on different roles because each of them is controlling a different doll. Gender plays an active role within the social realm of play of the two girls. The girls playing together demonstrates a more social focused play rather than boys who tend to prefer dominant play. If it were two boys playing together they would most likely be having sword fights, playing with hot wheels or Nerf guns rather than …show more content…
At the start of the video the children are standing together discussing the game and discussing the different rules. The girl in all pink and blonde hair seems to be the one that is determining the rules and telling the other children. The little girl is actively participating in formal games with rules because she is playing a game that involves rules and organization. The little girl also seems to be engaged in the social dimension of cooperative or organized supplementary play. She is playing with the other children and she has goals. Her goals are to chase the other children when she is “it” and run away from the other children when she is not. The little girl understands that when she is tagged she is “it” and when she tags one of the other children they become “it”. As stated in the textbook, cooperative or organized supplementary play is the most advanced and complex. Children at this age love to run and play and seem to have an endless amount of energy which may contribute to their eagerness to play with other
Like Mildred Parten, Sarah Smilansky is well known for her four stages of play. The four stages are: Functional Play, Constructive Play, Dramatic or Symbolic Play, and Games with Rules (On Track). In Functional Play, children are just beginning to learn and explore. They are examining and engaging with the world around them to learn the function of objects. Piaget and
Play has been essentially described as the primary occupation of children. Within this occupation, children are given a platform to develop cognitively, physically, and most noticeable, socially. In regards to the developmental benefits of play, sociologist over the years have lent their knowledge to further analyze distinct types of play in which children engage. One such sociologist was Mildred Parten whose work on play later became a regularly cited source for the various types of play children typically engage in at various stages of development. Within her play model, Parten categorized play into the six categories of unoccupied behavior, onlooker behavior, solitary play, parallel play, associative play, and cooperative play (Text citation). In accordance with the actions and behaviors defined by Parten, children who were present at the time of the observation explicitly exhibited similar conduct.
Many actions of the two observed children reflect and relate to ideas and theories of child development. Child A involves herself in and sustains pretend play, which links to the ideas of Smilansky, Hartup and Howes. Additionally, elements of her play relate to the idea of egocentrism present in Piaget’s stages of development. Child B’s play includes moments of difficulty to be overcome, and relates to the cognitive developmental theory of Piaget in regards to equilibrium, schemas, accommodation and assimilation. Moreover, themes of moral behaviour and social learning theory are evident. Comparatively, both Child A and B’s play links to research surrounding the concept of sex-typed play behaviour.
The word “play” has numerous meanings to different people in different contexts. Therefore it cannot have one definition and is described in a number of ways. Smith (2010) describes play as involvement in an activity, purely for amusement and to take part for fun. That play is “done for it’s own sake, for fun, not for any external purpose.” (Smith, 2010. P4) Therefore, as one precise definition cannot be presented for the word ‘play,’ it is described in a number of ways such as social dramatic play. Briggs and Hanson (2012) portray social dramatic play as the building blocks of a child’s ability to accept the possibility to step into another world, building and developing on children’s higher order thinking, accentuating the child as a social learner. Another example of play is exploratory play, which is described as children being placed in an explorer or investigator role, to identify the cause or affect a resources that is presented to them has. (Briggs, M and Hanson, A. 2012) Games are also another example of play. They are included on the basis that playing games with rules, regardless of age, can develop a child’s intellectual capabilities along with their physical, behavioural and emotional health. (Briggs, M and Hanson, A. 2012).
The various theories spearheading the evaluation of play are associated with some of the leading Development theorist such as Vygotsky and Piaget who provide clear cognitive or intellectual capacities in which guides play (Lecture Week 1, 20017). As such, a specific goals of play may be cognitive or intellectual development in which children are able to identify roles, symbolism, organization, schemas, communication, moral development and
It took me some time to decide what I would like the thrust of this paper to be on. And though I tossed several ideas around- how children play- kept circling back around. I feel that, letting children play is vital to healthy development. Some have even argued that play is the primary way that children learn verbal and logic skills. Playing with other children also expands a child’s understanding of him/herself and others (Fernie 2000). So, throughout my placements I noted the differences in how children play. This paper will attempt to discuss the differences and similarities that I observed.
2.5.2 Social play Social play is defined as play that occurs in the interaction of children with caregivers or other children. Typically, social play is not classified as a unique category of play because any type of play – object play, pretend play, and physical play – has the potential to be enacted alone or with others (Tarman & Tarman, 2011). White (2012) in her study “the power of play” explains that interactions within play scenarios, however, provide great benefits to children whether their partners are adults or peers, and are therefore worthy of note. In her study, which focused on how children can benefit from play and imagination in early childhood, she notes that with age and increasingly mature social capacities, children’s interactive play with peers becomes progressively more common and complex. Children around the age of three are beginning to socialize with other children.
This stage of development is categorized by imagination and symbolic language. During the beginning of this stage, toddlers spend most of their playtime using their imagination and playing pretend. This helps them to decipher the difference between reality and fantasy. Between the ages of five and seven, these children transition from parallel play, to associative and cooperative types of play behavior. These new play behaviors increase their social skills as they interact with peers, siblings, and parents. During this period, children also start engaging in dramatic play with others. This helps them explore different social roles, such as pretending to be a mother while playing house. Dramatic play opens up an entirely new world to children as they use their imagination with others (Hughes, 2006). By playing in a world that does not provide the child with any negative consequences, they are free to play without
The types of games that children play change dramatically compared to early childhood. In addition to the activities that they already play, they start to strive for a challenge. Middle childhood is the time when children acquire skills such as reading and arithmetic. During this time children start to play games that are complicated and rule oriented. Because of these changes, children begin to play games based on strategy such as playing cards and other games that test their mind. They play games such as Pokémon or Yu-Gi-Oh. These card games require children to count, remember, and plan strategies. By playing these games, children begin to plan consciously, coordinate actions, evaluate their progress, and modify their plans and strategies based on reflection and evaluation.
The moment that I started observing the children at play, the first observation that I made was that there was a great diversity in the ages of the children. The main age group that I noticed appeared to be preschool-kindergarten (4-6 yrs). There was a group (Group A) of preschool-kindergarten boys, with the exception of a much older child (possibly 6-7 yrs) engaged in what appeared to be a “tag”. Group A as a whole were engaged in the same activity as well as appeared to have the same goal, which consisted of chasing one another throughout the different obstacles within the play area. According to Parten, since Group A was playing together as well as appeared to have a mutual goal, this can be described as cooperative play which is defined as, “children play together with a common purpose or goal, taking turns”.
Children can dress up and pretend they are other people. They take on a role of a mom, dad, brother or even sister.
I will describe these types of play that usually develop as a child begins to engage in cooperative play.
In co-operative play therefore, the interest lies both in the players and the activity itself, the participants are assigned roles and there is a form or organisation. In this observation study, it is more likely that Neil will be engaging for the most part in parallel and associative play as co-operative play requires a level of social maturity and organisational skills that many 3 year olds will not possess. The observer was able to not that Neil participated in associative play slightly more frequently than he did parallel play, for example he sat in the reading corner with one of his peers and they looked through the pictures and turning the pages, though at times it appeared they were moving slightly out of sync; as in Neil would be looking at a picture while the other boy was attempting to move on to the next page. He also demonstrated associative play with multiple children when they were playing with puzzles that had been laid out, working together but again, without organisation as some children snatched puzzle pieces away or took out pieces that had already been correctly
Holistic development of young children is the key determination and through play they are able to survive and become physically healthy, able to learn, and emotionally secure and into where they progress into responsible and productive adults with positive reinforcements in the future. When there are societal issues that are barriers such as “technology, childhood obesity, culture, etc.” (Gaston, A, Module 1, Unit 1, 2016), children are then unable to revel in freedom of movement in where play is adventurous and brings out positive behavior. “Play supports the holistic development through the development of intellectual, emotions, socially, physical, creative and spiritual” (Gaston, A, Module 1, Unit 2, 2016), signifying that holistic development is an important factor to be aware of as the child grows. An example would be when in Workshop 1 of Social and Cognitive Styles of Play, we had to play in the given activity for the time being and observe our members and distinguish what kind of cognitive play it was. And one of the assigned question to
Play has many benefits to children’s development. Practice/functional play helps build sensory/motor skills in infants and toddlers. Active play helps build gross motor skills. Exploratory play helps build fine motor skills. Representational play helps build language skills. (London, 2010). “Some studies have also confirmed that play promotes higher-order thinking” (Jaruszewicz, 2012). Play provides children with opportunities to practice the rules that adult and society set without fear of making a mistake or being punished. (Jaruszewicz, 2012).