Forks Over Knives: Documentary Analysis

567 Words2 Pages

The documentary, “Forks Over Knives” makes a compelling case in advocating for consumption of plant-based foods. It heavily criticizes animal-based foods and calls for its total elimination from our dietary consumption. It makes a convincing argument that most of the world’s chronic diseases could be averted by strictly following a vegetable or whole foods diet. In my opinion, a plant-based diet is healthier than processed foods. However, I disagree with the claim that animal-based foods ought to be banished from our meals. The human body needs animal-based foods such as omega 3and free-range eggs. As seen in fork over knives (2011), it highlights the fact that the western world’s consumption of processed foods, meat, and milk-related products is widely, if not entirely, responsible for the surge in diet-related chronic diseases such as cancer and diabetes. The documentary borrows heavily from the work of Dr. T Colin …show more content…

Varying levels of casein made the rodents vulnerable to cancer. Though this conclusively depicts milk as being potentially harmful, it does not indicate the unsuitability of meat consumption. Additionally, the documentary also narrowly captures a study proving that some nutrients in animal protein caused increased susceptibility to cancer. However, the documentary does not shed more light on the particular type of nutrients and whether they are found in plants. The continued rise in the number of people suffering from obesity due to poor feeding habits is explicitly discussed in the film. Blame is mostly placed on meat, milk and processed carbohydrates as the food to avoid at all costs. From the tests mentioned above, the scientists behind “Forks over Knives” clearly illustrate the potentially hazardous repercussions of milk and processed carbohydrates to the human body. The entire documentary nonetheless utterly fails to show any concrete proof that meat is

Open Document