Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Moral panics in today's society
Moral panics in today's society
Stanley cohen moral panic theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Moral panics in today's society
The term moral panic was first invented by Stanley Cohen in his article “Folk Devils and Moral Panics” (Burns 2000, Para 4).eek It is an occasional episode that in its occurrence subjects the society to fear of jeopardy of the societal values and principles. This is an occurrence that is identified by the society as a threat to their values and interests (Burns 2000, Para 4). According to Krinsky (2013, para 1), it can be defined as an “occurrence which is started by stories which are alarming in the media and reinforced by reactive laws and public policy which have an exaggerated or misdirected public concern, anxiety, fear, or anger over a perceived threat to social order.” These are public or politically instigated reactions by the media …show more content…
It can be caused by any event. These events range from a child murdering another to bullying in schools. It could be the notion of motorcycle gangs at war causing public disturbance in the society, or just their demeanour can cause great panic (Bonn, 2010). These events are exaggerated by the media who make them seem as catastrophic to the whole society (Thompson 2013, p.1). The more serious these situations are the more they endure. This causes great likelihood of societal reactive mechanisms of surveillance, discipline, regulation, and punishment (Herdt 2009, p.1). Moral panic is seen to occur in the events where the media takes an ordinary event and presents it as extraordinary. The media creates a deviancy amplification spiral in the motion. The journalists and their supporters demonize the people who are thought to be wrong doers and portray them as a source of moral decline and social disintegration. The media spreads this news to the society in an overwhelming way making the society perceive these groups as serious threats to the society (Jewkes 2004, p. 67). The media constructs a cycle to show that the event will occur again. They put a lot of exaggeration and distort the information. They report of non events which seem to support their predictions. In a discovery by Cohen, he stated that the media condemned use of violence by minority groups but acknowledged violence as a legitimate way of police to deal with problems (Jewkes 2004, p.
Crime and deviant behavior surprisingly helps increase “social activity” among various different people within a society. Therefore, crime and deviant behavior brings “people together in a common posture of anger and indignation…when these people come together to express their outrage over the offense…they develop a tighter sense of solidarity than existed earlier” (Erikson 4). For example, in the Steven Avery case, the people of Manitowoc, Wisconsin, all had very strong feelings of Steven Avery and his family, and as a result they were seen as deviant people in their own hometown. Those feelings towards him, and his family, would be a critical factor when he was accused of the horrendous crime (Making). Based on their feelings towards the Avery family, the society in which he lived developed the overall concept of us versus them (Erikson 11). Therefore, another concept that arises as a result of crime and deviant behavior is public temper, which is described as a “mutual group feeling” (Erikson
Political hysteria is a phenomenon under the social science discipline of politics/government. Burt uses the term political hysteria to describe recurring events in American history where, based on a shared sense of threat from others, a movement of national politics takes center
The concept of moral panic emerges when the mass media sensationalizes violence as it relates to drug use and sales. It is defined as a “condition, episode, person or group emerges to become defined as a threat to social values and interests.” (Altheide, 2009, p.79) Media coverage on select topics such as drugs and the violence associated with it shows a pronounced problem. The problems and issues trigger a panic by the public to act and reduce the threat to social conditions to prevent violence and drugs from reaching their communities. “Moral panics can be understood as having an ideological dimension in that they...
Mass hysteria can be defined as, “The sociopsychological phenomenon in which a large group of people exhibits the same or similar hysterical symptoms simultaneously” (“Mass Hysteria”). Hysteria replaces logic and reasoning with insanity, clouding people's judgment and perception of what is happening. Absurd and unreasonable behavior takes place that is not understood and cannot be medically explained or treated. Mass hysteria occurs more often than people believe when large groups of people are fearful of rumored or imagined events, which may lead to mass chaos and destruction.
To know how mass hysteria still affects modern day, we have to look at an example from the 20th century, The Japanese internment camps. Nearing the end of World War 2 JFK signed executive order 9066 which effectively made it possible for military leaders to choose individuals of any ethnic background who had a possibility of defecting from the united states if the time arose. This meant for the thousands of Japanese citizens, two-thirds of which were born in America, that they were going to be forcibly removed from their homes on the west coast. Most of these Japanese citizens were given a week or two, but it the most extreme cases they only had a day. When the citizens left they were forced to sell all of their belongings, this meant that
The media is often considered to be biased. The reason for this is because they do not act neutral on the things that they report on. They usually give their point of view and tend to warp the information so it’s easily digestible by the average person. This type of “nugget feeding,” can influence the judgment of some one who has no idea what is going on. The media tends to sensationalize the news by making it seem dramatic, and compelling. This hooks the viewer, and keeps them tuned in. The purpose of this is for ratings, and most importantly money. The media has become less professional, and their morality has gone down hill. The editors/gatekeepers decide what information is sent out for the public to see, and hear. This is another way that the news is shaped for our viewing pleasure.
Moral Panics and the Media. Oxford: Oxford University Goode, E and Ben- Yehuda, N. (1994) Moral Panics. The social construction of deviance. Oxford: Blackwells.
This kind of social issue is more evident when episodes with violence are trending topics. For example, during and after the September 11th’s attack in New York, many Arabs, Muslims, and South Asians, were subject to revisions and detentions because authorities had no clue about how those mentioned attacks were perpetrated and who did them. It was not just a matter concerning authorities, society in general condemned hardly to the entire eastern community, even though many of that people stopped, detained, and questioned, did not have any linkage with this terrorist event.
middle of paper ... ... In addition, the media today continues to dramatize public events. Cases such as the Zimmerman Trial or foreign incidents in Ukraine remain headlines in news articles for months. Each source presents bias and influences its audience differently.
Hysteria has no place in a society because it is wrong. It causes chaos and confusion and in these cases death.
The media takes a biased approach on the news that they cover, giving their audience an incomplete view of what had actually happened in a story. Most people believe that they are not “being propagandized or being in some way manipulated” into thinking a certain way or hearing certain “truths” told by their favorite media outlets (Greenwald 827). In reality, everyone is susceptible to suggestion as emphasized in the article “Limiting Democracy: The American Media’s World View, and Ours.” The
A moral panic can be defined as a phenomenon, frequently initiated by disquieting media and reinforced by responsive laws and public policies, of embellished public concern, angst or anger over a perceived danger to societal order (Krinsky, 2013). The media plays a crucial role in emphasizing a current moral panic. In Jock Young’s chapter Images of Deviance (1971), he comments on the phenomenon of deviance magnification, he deems dramatic media coverage of deviant behaviours to be ironic, owing to the fact that it unintentionally increases rather than restrains the apparent deviance. In hind sight the media create social problems, owing to the fact that they can present them dramatically and are able to do it swiftly (Young & Cohen, 1971: 37).
One piece of research which focuses on this aspect is Stanley Cohen’s: Folk devils and moral panics published in 1972. Folk devils, is actually a term Cohan came up with during his research into subcultures, after the Easter Monday ‘fiasco’ in Clacton in 1964. The term Folk devils; refers to a person or thing, held to be a bad influence in society, whereas moral panic; is a feeling of fear which is spread amongst a large number of people, where ‘evil’ threatens their society.
...om humble and non-violent to harsh and violent. It can also may lead to a person awareness of one’s environment and taking responsibility for one's actions which is what the world requires(Rosengren, 2000). Society is able to transition from the past to the future through real-time information on the present (Hiebert & Gibbons, 2000). Society therefore becomes a living organization, complete with a feedback loop provided by the media, well equipped to sense oncoming danger and learn from its mistakes in readiness for tomorrow (Preiss, 2007). However, caution needs to be put in place to prevent the youth and children from participating in actions they do not have a clue on but do them on the justifications of the actions watched over the media (Wells & Hakanen, 1997). Mass media will remain beautiful but when precautionary measures are not in place, it becomes ugly.
“The media's the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power. Because they control the minds of the masses” (Thinkexist, 2010). The mass media, including news, movies, magazines, music, or other entertainment source has become a part of daily life for many people. As the quote mentions mass media and its power are capable of influencing people’s mind and behavior. Contents in the media introduced to young people make it difficult for them to distinguish between what is real and what is not, as a result stimulating confusion and blind imitation. The mass media plays an important role in the increase of violence, sexual activity, and risky behaviors among teenagers.