Fitzgerald's Portrayal Of Jesus In The Great Gatsby

932 Words2 Pages

In Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby few characters display a predisposition for toward the religious ideology that dominated the beliefs of many during the time period and yet a majority of their behaviour that could be considered unscrupulous happens under the scrutinizing gaze of Doctor T.J Eckleburg, a character that is not only implied to be god through religious imagery and symbolism but also explicitly stated as such by George Wilson. Gatsby himself fulfills the Jesus narrative with Fitzgerald often drawing clear parallels between the story of James Gatz and the notion of Jesus first put forward in Ernest Renan’s book The Life of Jesus in which Jesus is instead a “self-made man”, much like Gatsby is described in the book. In the book the …show more content…

It is the place where Tom discloses to George that the car that killed Myrtle was Gatsby’s ultimately sealing his fate. All of these misdeeds are watched over by the glaring eyes of T.J Eckleburg. Wilson explicitly states the relationship between the billboard and god in discussion with Michaelis after Myrtles death. He says "I told her she might fool me but she couldn’t fool God. ‘God knows what you’ve been doing, everything you’ve been doing. You may fool me, but you can’t fool God!” (Fitzgerald, 152) whilst staring out the window and towards the billboard. All of the “immoral” activity occurring under the watchful eyes of T.J Eckleburg suggests god now watches over a “sinful” land, full of corruption and …show more content…

In chapter 6 it is stated “The truth was that Jay Gatsby, of West Egg, Long Island, sprang from his Platonic conception of himself. He was a son of God—a phrase which, if it means anything, means just that—and he must be about His Father’s business, the service of a vast, vulgar, and meretricious beauty. So he invented just the sort of Jay Gatsby that a seventeen year old boy would be likely to invent, and to this conception he was faithful to the end.” (Fitzgerald 95). The book The Life of Jesus by Ernest Renan presents Jesus, not as the actual son of god but instead as a man who presented himself as so. Renan describes this man as “faithful to his self-created dream but scornful of the factual truth that finally crushes him and his dream” A statement that bares such remarkable similarity to the ultimate demise of Jay Gatsby that it borders on duplicity, for in the end it is Gatsby’s single minded determination to reverse time and be with Daisy and his utter refusal to accept that he and Daisy can never be together that leads to him to downfall as he dies in order to protect her. The comparison between Gatsby and Ernest Renan’s variation of Jesus is further strengthened by the statement “sprang from his platonic conception of himself” which comments on Gatsby’s transition from James Gatz – a penniless boy with little in the way of prospects and no hope of being with Daisy – to Jay

Open Document