Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of women throughout English literature
The role of women throughout English literature
Gender roles of women in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of women throughout English literature
Adapting a story into a movie is not an easy task for a film director. There are a lot of aspects that need to be taken into consideration so that the movie would not upset the readers or the writer of the original story. Although the concept of freedom in art-making allows a film director to be as imaginative as he can in adapting a story, the issue of the movie being compared to the original text is in fact inevitable. Personally, I think comparing does not necessarily mean criticising one work of art or the other. It is rather more to finding the similarities and differences between the movie and the original text which the audience who have read the original story sometimes cannot help but do. I partially agree with the quote “A (film) …show more content…
Dick. The changes that I have made to this story in making my film adaptation are all founded by solid reasons. For example, in the original text, the character Lora plays only a minor character that did not serve much purpose to the story. Her contribution to the plot is only towards the end of the story when she offers to help the main character Conger. In contrary, my film adaptation made Lora as one of the leading characters. She is a secret agent who serves for the First Church which is an organisation Conger is fighting against. Her purpose as a secret agent is to bring an antagonist character in the film which is not apparent in the original short story where Conger did not face any elaborate conflict because there is no specific antagonist. His conflict in the short story mainly described through narration of his investigation process which can be very dull for the audience to see in motion pictures. This is the reason why I chose to reinvent Lora as an antagonistic character that can bring more action and fighting scenes in the film. Lora also serves as a character that reveals the message of the story to the audience at the end of the film because she is the one who will voiced out question for Conger’s action and moral principle. Showing this scene of dispute between Conger and Lora will be an easier method to let the audience grasp the author’s underlying message compared to filming a lengthy scene of explanation through narration. I have taken the author’s idea and messages into consideration before making any changes to the story. In sum, although I have made several changes to the story, I never disregard the important elements in the short story that I feel deserve to be honoured and delivered in the
The horror genre of film captives the frightfulness of individual fear, horror is the only genre that is meant captive the terror of the audience. The horror- the genre has been around well over one hundred- years there has been an extension of different types of horror and how the audience perceives horror. Many would even argue that horror films often reflect the fear of society in that certain time period. The evolution of horror reflects the evolution of society’s fear.
Many changes are displayed in the film adapted from the playwright. One of these main changes would be the ending of the story.
Many novels are transcribed from their original texts to films. Some of the movies are similar to the original plots, others do not follow the authors work. Alice Hoffman’s novel Practical Magic is altered when it is made into a movie; and Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible which was also made into a movie, was extremely similar to his original writing. There are multiple variables that account for how a movie is made some of them include; the amount of income, how much can be changed, and the author’s approval. The two recreations previously mentioned, have two completely different outcomes, the results all depend on the amount of creative licensing the movie company has.
Many films are criticized to be way different from the book and therefore not as good. The movie Of Mice and Men, however, is very well done and very similar to the book. In this movie were elements that created mood and atmosphere, elements that made the movie good, and elements/ things that could have been improved in order to reflect the novel better.
At this point, the readers create their own movie in a way. They will determine important aspects of how the character speaks, looks like, and reacts. Whereas, in the movie, the reader has no choice but to follow the plot laid out in front of them. No longer can they picture the characters in their own way or come up with their different portrayals. The fate of the story, while still unpredictable, was highly influenced by the way the characters looked, spoke, and presented themselves on screen.
The film that was produced after the novel has a lot of differences and not as
It’s pretty clear that film and literature are very different mediums and when you try to make one into the other, such as an adaptation, you’re going to have some things that are lost in translation and seen in a different light. When an original work is made into a movie, I think they’re kind of at a disadvantage because they only have a few hours to get the whole story across while also keeping the viewer intrigued by what is taking place on the screen right in front of their eyes. Movies are able to contain special effects, visuals, and music though which can impact a viewer and make a scene stay in their mind longer which is a plus side to being able to view something. Literature on the other hand, has a greater advantage. They can keep the reader entertained for a considerably long time and you’re able to get more information about people and events such as what a character is thinking or what is happening behind the scenes during a specific event. I understand that people are going to have different opinions when it comes to whether a book or film adaptation of a work is the best and it is not always going to be the same for each and every piece of work. One thing I think though, is that The Namesake in both the film and the movie, they’re both accurate and concise in the way that they relate to one another.
Adapting a novel into film is a difficult process which sometimes means filmmakers must make changes to the script. Most movies were originally written for some other purpose, as a book, drama or short story. The narrator, who is important in written works, “largely disappears” when a movie is made (PBS.org 1). Thus, a literary work and its film adaptation can have the same title and be vastly different. The Pedestrian’s movie adaptation, for example, displays a separation in theme from the original short story despite their similarities.
People flock to horror movies each year. Usually to be scared. Another is to solve the question of Who done it? Unfortunately, a lot of these horror movies fail to scare people or make the killer so obvious the audience gets bored. Occasionally, there are a few horror movies that stick out. Scream, directed by Wes Craven, is one of them. Wes Craven is always toying with the viewer's fears. Always finding ways to scare the audience at every turn. He also plays with the viewer's head, and has them second guessing themselves. How does he do it? Well, as one of the characters in the movie exclaims, "There's a formula to it. A very simple formula. Everybody's a suspect!" This paper will discuss how Craven uses sound, camera shots, and mise en scene
For example, in the book, both Hrothgar and Beowulf are portrayed as “good” kings because of their bravery and compassion towards their Thanes. However, in the movie, Hrothgar was portrayed as a crude drunkard who made poor decisions in the past and thus, impacting him negatively in the long run. Also, Beowulf was portrayed differently in the movie because he was depicted as a constant liar who was tempted by lust and greed. The intention for the movie was to convey a clear distinction between what a “good” king is and what a “bad” king is. Due to this misrepresentation in the movie, both Hrothgar and Beowulf were perceived as flawed kings, when in the book, Beowulf is considered as the “perfect” hero and Hrothgar, a promising
We are both on the same page regarding the initiative you have of showing Beneath the Helmet to our pledges. There are many vital lesson to gain from this documentary and the values held by the Israeli Defense Force.
The way the show addresses Raj’s social anxiety is even worse. When the show first begins Raj is completely unable to speak to women, and struggles to speak to strangers. Yes, social anxiety can make it hard for someone to interact with others, but the disorder itself is much worse. In his article Joshi says “Social anxiety isn't that specific. It's something that affects every area of your life, sometimes to the point where people don't leave their house for weeks at a time.”
It is obvious that this scene was meant to be performed, with all its subtle actions and expressed grievances. Here one confrontation of...
Almost everyone has a favorite genre of film, but how everyone defines their favorite genre can differ greatly. Horror is one of the genres where its definition can be perceived differently by many people. Like all other genres, horror does have rules and traditions that must be included in order for a film to be considered a horror film. These rules and traditions include a protagonist, an antagonist, an escape or escape attempt of some sort, and very influential audio and visual effects.
Adaptation of any kind has been a debate for many years. The debate on cinematic adaptations of literary works was for many years dominated by the questions of fidelity to the source and by the tendencies to prioritize the literary originals over their film versions (Whelehan, 2006). In the transference of a story from one form to another, there is the basic question of adherence to the source, of what can be lost (Stibetiu, 2001). There is also the question of what the filmmakers are being faithful to or is it the novel’s plot in every detail or the spirit of the original (Smith, 2016). These are only few query on the issue of fidelity in the film adaptation.