“The Wonderful Wizard of Oz” is a children’s novel written by Frank Baum, an American author. It has many similarities and differences when comparing it to the film that was produced after the book, “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz”. The main character in the two different stories is a young girl named Dorothy. Throughout the film and novel not all characters that are introduced are in both the novel and film. The settings of the two different stories are located in different areas, where the film used more imagination. Another thing are there clothing that were used in the film and described in the novel, that were different. An example from that would be Dorothy’s slippers that were meant to keep her protected. The novel has a lot of differences and similarities to …show more content…
They were Ruby red slippers. The Wicked Witch of the East represents the bondage of the Economic Burden. Both slippers are different in the book and novel and was both given to her differently. The special glasses on the other hand were needed in the novel enable to enter the Emerald City. The Emerald City symbolizes to the US History because it is a Green city representing money issues and the heart of the nation10 didn’t have to be worn when entering into the Emerald City. The special glasses were only used in the novel as the slippers were handed to Dorothy differently in the film than the novel. They slippers both looked differently after comparing the two descriptions from the novel and the image from the film. land directly on her, that’s when she got her slippers, she took it The house that was taken in the cyclone from Kansas The film that was produced after the novel has a lot of differences and not as many similarities. They both have a few similar characters, different settings and clothing used. In conclusion, the movie was a symbolic11 it was an informed commentary in the 1890’s over the fight of the free
In 1939, Victor Fleming made a film version of L. Frank Baum’s novel “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz.” However, both the novel and the film focuses or touches on the same moral, it features the protagonist Dorothy who resides in Kansas the farm, along with her aunt Em and uncle Henry as well as her dog Toto. Both Baum’s novel and Fleming’s 1939 film adaptation the setting is in Kansas which is described as a small farm which Dorothy lives in which in Baum’s novel is picturized as gloomy, grey and dull. Throughout Fleming’s adaptation of Baum’s “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz,” there are a number of differences which presents itself in a direct manner on screen as well as similarities. The variety of changes in the film’s adaptation tends to take away from the meaning of L. Frank Baum’s depiction in his novel to a certain level and extent.
While watching the movie, I could see that the main characters in the book, both their names and traits, were the same in both the movie and book. However, aside from that there were many different as...
There are many differences between the book; To Kill a Mockingbird and the movie. Some differences are easy to spot and some aren’t. Many things that are in the book aren’t in the movie. Many of these things you don’t need, but are crucial to the plot of the book. Movies and books have differences and similarities, but many things in books MUST be included in the movie.
From the start, the movie is adapted from the novel and therefore it could not cover everything, some actions or acts in the novel are too dense such that it is not of any importance to angle them in the movie. It is very realistic to everyone that the movie cannot cover every single paragraph in the novel even the memorable ones. Some materials are left out in the film, and others were changed.
Frank Baums, The Wizard of Oz is arguably one of the most popular films made. Even though it was released in 1939, nearly three-quarters of a century ago, the film continues to entertain audiences and speak to them in a personal way. The question that comes to the mind when analyzing this film is: What is it about this film that gives it such timelessness? When reflecting on the film’s timeless qualities, it seems clear the plot is one of the things that enable it to maintain its relevance. Primarily, the plot of The Wizard of Oz is timeless because it is such an excellent example of the heroic journey, both in literally and cinematically. This journey of self-awareness is a metaphor for growth, which is something we all search to discover at some time in our lives.
...nt witches had very detailed wardrobes. In particular the witch Evillene, who was mean, had a dress similar to the size of a wedding dress made of old and dirty jewels. Glinda the good witch had a dress that was also made of jewels but they were bright and pleasing to the eye opposite of Evillene’s dress.
...d coloring of certain images. The novel, however, puts much greater emphasis on the imagination and creativity, and on the main character Tita. The novel really makes the reader feel Titas pain and grow with her as she discovers her freedom, whereas the movie failed to achieve this. Moreover, the movie tends to ignore the significant of 3 integral motifs, cooking, tears and sensuality.
There is a lot of things different about the book and the movie the book is placed in Paris, France,in 1640/1655 and the movie is placed in Nelson Washington, 1987. Then how they end in the book christen dies and Roxane becomes a widow and Cyrano tells her the news every saturday and one day some people set him up and dropped a log on his head and went to Roxane and talked to her than died from the log. Where in the movie Christian does not die and C.D and Roxanne fall in
Scene: This scene in the film comes just after the house has been picked up in the twister. Dorothy's house has been lifted up into the sky and suddenly dropped back down to earth in the middle of the Land of Oz. In the scene itself, Dorothy leaves her home to see that she is "Not in Kansas anymore," and finds the new and amazing world of the munchkin city in front of her. She also meets Gwendela the good witch as her journey in Oz begins.
Finally the setting in both the movie and the book is in London, however, the Book’s time period is around 1920 whereas the movies is more modern. This change in the time period made the movie more appealing to me because it is more relatable than the book that took place in 1902. Another small difference in time period between the book and movie is that in the book the first wish that r white makes is for two hundred pounds but in the movie it is for three hundred pounds which implies that the time period is different because prices have gone up.
In both the novel and movie focus on the war. The war influences the characters to enroll.Also, the main setting is at the Devon School. However, in the novel Gene visits Leper at his house but in the movie Leper lives in the woods.In the novel Gene is coming back to the Devon School 15 years later.However, in the book he is coming to Devon as a new student.Therefore, similarities and differences exist in time and setting in the novel and the movie.In the novel and the movie there are similarities and differences in events, character, and time and setting.
Ethan cai Dr.Friedman Us history Oct 06 Wizard of Oz:difference between the book and movie The Wizard of Oz was a story happened in the girl Dorothy’s dream. The girl Dorothy lived with her Uncle Henry and Aunt Em in a farm in Kansas. One day, after a strong cyclone, Dorothy found that she was at a very special place where she had never been before. The crazy cyclone brought Dorothy and her little dog Toto to a place named Munchkins.
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
There were many differences in the characters' relationships with each other. For instance, Heather and Melinda’s connection were very different from book to film.
Some of the characters in the novel, like Lennie, are portrayed differently in the movie. In the novel, Lennie is said to be “a huge man” (2), but in the movie he isn’t very big, although he is bigger than George and some of the other characters. In the movie he is stronger and bigger than the others, but not to the extreme amount that the book portrays him to be. Also, Lennie is depicted as very mentally challenged, which is shown by the way he speaks. Whereas in the book, Lennie is said to have a mind of a young child instead of being disabled. As well as Lennie, Curley’s wife is represented a little bit differently. In the movie,...