Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of transportation technology in our societies
Impact of modern transportation in our society
How has modern means of transport changed our lives
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of transportation technology in our societies
With quicker travel, visits would be easier, but not everyone may see it that way. Steve Parker, in his excerpt, suggests that living in a fast moving society with many different types of transportation, creates more disadvantages than it does advantages. Parker supports his position by first listing examples of how these automobiles are separating us from family and causing old friends to never be seen again. He continues by comparing our generation of a fast moving society, to the close and supportive relationships of the past. The authors purpose is to point out the disadvantages and explain how they outweigh the advantages, in order to explain how a fast moving society is not as much of a good thing, as it is a bad thing. While automobiles do create the ability to move away and leave family, the …show more content…
In his argument, Parker, states that “Fast moving society makes it easy for us to move away from the people and places… and often we lose track of old friends we never see again.” Parker is arguing that people have access to traveling away from friends and family, and as a result, people tend to no longer have close relationships as a result of fast moving society, caused by automobiles. However, the likelihood that someone may lose their close relationships as a result of moving away, varies depending on the person, and not everyone is going to be willing to lose track of friends and family because they moved away. Some people may move away, but make it an effort to continue sharing the close, supportive relationships, instead of letting them be lost. For the most part, people are not going to want to move away, just so that they can get away from family and friends, so most people will want to make sure they don’t lose that close
Owning an automobile presents the opportunity to preserve personal independence. However, It is unclear how Mr. Bragg ends up with the conclusion that the SUV alone represents personal independence. The very reason for owning a care is for personal independence; therefore, the SUV is not the sole means to achieve this. Additionally, the paper goes on to state that the secondary purpose for the SUV is personal protection. Man...
Another thing to note is that that a good car deserves a choice place in our lives. I am not advocating the need for a very expensive Car but one that would
since car ownership is so expensive, but they may need a car because of urban sprawl and inadequate
Whether they traveled for economic reasons, technological reasons, or even social reasons, Americans moved regardless of the conditions. Moving was a vital aspect of American life, almost everyone did it, and almost everyone needed to do it. Although today in America, it is the complete opposite. Today, people still need to move, although they are just not doing it. This is evident in “How to Get Americans Moving Again,” when Brooks writes, “Curiously, some of the Americans who would seem poised to gain the most from moving appear to be among the most stuck” (Brooks). Also, it is not like Americans aren’t moving because there isn’t better opportunity elsewhere. There are just as many reasons to move today as there were during the seventeen hundreds, if not more! Brooks states, “We might expect movement from a high-unemployment state like Mississippi (unemployment rate: 6.3 percent) to low unemployment states like New Hampshire (2.6 percent) or North Dakota (3.1 percent). Instead Mississippians are even less likely to migrate out of the state today than they were before the Great Recession hit”
The ability to travel these days is amazing and a big advantage to many people and families. Perry Patetic in his passage, argues that advantages to living in a highly mobile society are outweighed by the disadvantages. The author supports his argument by first explaining that the supportive relationships people should have, are being lacked. He continues by stating that a lot of families do not live near each other. The others purpose is to encourage people to stay in town with their families and not move away just because they can. Our fast moving society with more mobility should not be affecting our relationships in any negative way.
Wilson begins his article with a hypothetical scenario in which the proposition for the mass production of the automobile is being raised today as a current issue. Within this fictional scenario, he explains that many aggressive predictions and complaints regarding the negative effects of cars on society would be made and that due to such strong opposition, the personal car would probably not be created. Wilson returns to this scenario later on in the article, explaining that people living in a carless nation would be forced to have small homes, located in large, highly dense cities where the streets are congested by pedestrians, trucks, and buses (Wilson 22). He also insists that travelling in such a country would be hard, and that when you did, the only places you would be able to travel to would be crowded areas which were able to support a nearby train stop (Wilson 22). Wilson insist that living in such a nation would be unpleasant, having many serious problems, unlike the trivial ones used by anti-car critics to discourage car usage now.
In the twentieth century, the introduction of the motor vehicle in the United States became not only noteworthy, but also vital in the development of modern American civilization. This technologically complex machine led citizens to vast future dependency on the invention. While mobility was suddenly not limited to alternative, more convoluted options such as railroad stations or bicycles, yet copiously amplified to aid convenience and expanded leisure opportunities. From auto-racing to redesigning infrastructure, motor vehicles allowed progression, digression, and essentially uttermost change to lifestyles of the American people.
The impact of the automobile between 1900 through 1945 was immense. It paved the way for a future dependency on the automobile. To paint a better picture, imagine life without an automobile. Everyday life would be dull, cumbersome, and tedious. An individual's mobility would be very limited. Basically, the life without an automobile could not be fathomed. The importance of the automobile is often taken for granite. Society may not know what appreciate the impact of the automobile and effects it has created. The impact of the automobile had both positive and negative effects on America between 1900 through 1945. Automobile provided an outlet for individuals and spread the freedom of travel among all classes of people. It also helped to introduce rural dwellers to the aspects of urban life and vice versa. One of the negative effects was that automobiles helped to put of big decline in the use of railroads. Over the course of the paper, I will try to expose the huge impact of the automobile an early twentieth century life.
People today can take more trips for fun to see friends and relatives who live far away more often because of the quick travel options we now have. This was not possible in the past.
No longer having vehicles would require a decrease in family size, because one can only imagine the constraints and stress of having to walk or travel by bus with numerous children. Some parents currently have difficulty traveling with one child via car. Since they will no longer have this luxury, society will then adapt and have fewer kids, if any. The difficulty in carrying a baby and car seat while walking great distances is immeasurable, and toting that same car seat from bus to bus is a hassle.
A change in location will naturally cause a replacement in friends. Although it is tempting to stay in touch with the past, it is simply futile to hold on to old friends. It is impossible because although a few friends will stay
Nowadays, cars are a common sight. Traffic jams have become a daily affair. My parents never sat in a car when they were young. They says that in their youth, people got around on foot or on bicycles. Cars and buses were rare. Only a few rich people could afford cars. The streets were unpaved and not dangerous. There was no pollution nor the deafening roar of
Think for a second here, what do you use almost every day to get to where you need to go? An automobile is probably what you are thinking of because just about everyone has one. Automobiles have become so common; nine out of every ten families in the United States own some type of vehicle. Now Imagine going through everyday life without one it would be nearly impossible! Automobiles have had a very positive impact on the world and on many people’s lives. However they have also taken quite a negative effect on the world and in life. Automobiles make it very easy to get to and from where you are going. Although automobiles have polluted the world and have taken lots of natural resources to keep going they are still a nice luxury many cannot live without. Automobiles are very reliable if they are kept in good condition and would not have to rely on public transportation.
On the contrary, using private car is the same convenience of travelling as public transport. When people are in a hurry, they can suddenly go ev...
Since the invention of the automobile, we have been able to decrease transportation costs, travel vast distances and decrease travel times. We are able to facilitate relationships, foster trade between places, and find better jobs. However, due to the inaccurate pricing of the roads, driving cars has turned from an innovation to pure frustration. The problem is traffic congestion; the increased usage of cars has created slower speeds and longer travel times due to greater demand for the road than the road has to offer. Roughly 3.4 million Americans endure extreme commutes, in which the trip to work and back eats up at least three hours each day (Balaker, Staley 2006).