Family Technology Rules: An Analysis

564 Words2 Pages

In the midst of the rapid technological advancements, concerns about the effects of the active use of technology have been voiced by parents. Hiniker and et al. conducts a survey to understand the types of technology rules families in the U.S. have established in their homes and the perceived effectiveness of those rules in Not at the Dinner Table: Parents’ and Children’s Perspectives on Family Technology Rules. These rules are divided into two types of groups: activity constraints and context constraints. Children are more likely to follow activity constraints than context constraints, as these require more effort and ask children to disconnect. The research suggests that parents overshare images and information that undermine a child’s image. Another challenge faced by both parents and …show more content…

Children are more likely to comply with the rules when they have an input when constructing the rules and when the parents abide by the rules as well. Hiniker and et al. calls for further research, in order to accurately determine the factors of complying with activity and context constraints. The research done by Hiniker and et al. relates to several topics learned in lecture. Children’s inability to disconnect at certain times relates back to today’s moral panic, which consists of pervasive connection and loss of connection strikes the fear of missing out on an event in some people. In an interview with Sarah Childress, Danah Boyd states that she believes despite the potential dangers of overexposure to technology, children will be alright because they know how to respond back to the schemes of brands and advertisers. In discussion of the positive impacts of technology, Hiniker and et al. mentions the correlation between social media and

Open Document