Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM)

764 Words2 Pages

What is evidence based-medicine?
The most popular definition of evidence-based medicine (EBM) states that it is “the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of the individual patient. It means integrating individual clinical expertise with the best external clinical evidence from systematic research.” What that mouthful means is that while no patient is identical, we can identify general best practices in the treatment or curing of certain illnesses. Unsurprisingly then, one of the key components of the EBM approach is the use of clinical practice guidelines. There is also a heavy emphasis on expanding the evidence base, particularly through randomized control trials to produce more …show more content…

A visit to your doctor may certainly seem like an evidence-based medicine: certain symptoms and tests yield a diagnosis, and that diagnosis in combination with your individual history leads to a treatment plan. Yet there is still room for wild amounts of variation—the reliance on the individual experience of healthcare providers means that a cluster of symptoms may signal a different diagnosis to different doctors, and due in part to the fee-for-service model in American medicine, doctors may be rewarded for ordering tests that are redundant or unnecessary. Even in the presence of strong evidence, compliance with guidelines isn’t all that high: four years after the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute issued guidelines for the treatment of asthma in 1991, only 45.5% of those surveyed were aware of the guidelines, and only 24% had gone so far as to read …show more content…

In a 1999 study of the same asthma guidelines mentioned above, a hospital committee educated the staff, eliminated barriers in following the guidelines and tested the treatment plan for six-months, only to manage a 68% adherence rate from hospital staff. Much of the resistance to EBM guidelines comes from healthcare providers themselves, who have a decent argument: the visibility of research and guidelines can be murky given the number of organizations and journals that contribute (it’s been estimated that a general practitioner would have to read 19 journal articles a day, each day of the year to stay current with every advance in treatment). Many physicians also see EBM as the promotion of “cookbook medicine,” a threat from academics and legislators toward the craft of their profession, although proponents of EBM say this could never happen, due to the complexity of modern medicine and the needs of individual patients. Studies have shown that consumers can be hesitant to support EBM as well, mistaking evidence-based to mean medical tests from the provider, or assuming that more (and more expensive) care is

Open Document