Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Demerits of effective communication
Demerits of effective communication
Demerits of effective communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Demerits of effective communication
The value of good communication in relationships is very important. A story written by Kate Chopin known as, “The Story of an Hour” reveals a relationship between two people that can be interpreted unhealthy. The beauty of the story is that Chopin leaves out the details of their relationship and just shows the wife’s reaction to her husband dying. Chopin leaves you to make your own interpretation about there relationship. Another story written by Raymond Carver known as “Cathedral” takes a little different perspective on the value of communication. In this story we see a woman that seems to have a closed minded husband and he eventually opens up at the end of the story. In the story Cathedral the couples relationship together grows. These two stories, as much as they are different they are also similar in their own ways. Each story has it’s own unique way of showing the value of communication within a relationship. In “The Story of an Hour” The wife dies from the returning of her husband …show more content…
When Mrs. Mallard finds her husband passes she was only sad for a short time. Part of the idea that her relationship was unhealthy because she begins chanting after a short time, “ Free! Body and soul free!” (477). She starts seeing opportunities that she could have without him. The story notes that, “Yet she had loved him –sometimes” (477). Mrs. Mallard seemed to be taking her husbands death to well. When it turns out her husband was not dead and he comes through the door she dies of “Heart Disease” (477). It can be assumed several things. She was really excited he was back or she had already looked so far beyond him when he came back she could not make herself live with him. Him dying was her way out and an easy way that she would not have to confront him herself. The connection between the two individuals was not a very strong one. A relationship that made her wishes he was
They hear the key turning in the front door and Mr. Mallard walks in the door. He was not on the train that he was always on, so he did not die, and it was only speculation from Richards that he had died. Mrs. Mallard was in shock when she saw her ‘dead’ husband walk through the door, and she died right then and there. The doctors said that she died from the “joy that kills”(Pg. 280). But it seems that is not true because she became glad that her husband had passed
Her husband’s friend, Richards, and her sister Josephine have to tell Mrs. Mallard that her husband has died in a train accident. They are both concerned that this news might harm Mrs. Mallard’s health. However, when Mrs. Mallard hears the news, she feels excitement and a spur of freedom. Even though her husband is dead, she doesn’t have to live the depressing life she has been living. Mrs. Mallard sits in a chair and then whispers, “Free, free, free!”
Mrs. Mallard?s freedom did not last but a few moments. Her reaction to the news of the death of her husband was not the way most people would have reacted. We do not know much about Mr. And Mrs. Mallards relationship. We gather from the text that her freedom must have been limited in some way for her to be feeling this way. Years ago women were expected to act a certain way and not to deviate from that. Mrs. Mallard could have been very young when she and Brently were married. She may not have had the opportunity to see the world through a liberated woman?s eyes and she thought now was her chance.
At the beginning of the story, we know that Mrs. Mallard has a heart trouble. Why the author builds the central character with a heart disease? The heart trouble of Mrs. Mallard seems to be just an excuse, a reason for her death at the ending of the story. Is it really a physical disease or through the image of the heart affliction, the author wants to imply an inner suffering of a woman in her marriage life?
These stories were written well over a hundred years apart from each other, but still shine light on some of the same topics. The Story of an Hour features a woman married to a man who has just unexpectedly been killed. It details her immediate public and private reactions, while implying continuously how fragile her life is itself based on a medical condition involving her heart. It takes place in a society where the husband is very clearly in charge of all family matters and a woman without one has no place in society. Similarly, though written many decades later, The Secretary Chant thoroughly describes the apparently monotonous life of a secretary who has become her role entirely to the point of physically being of the office, rather than
is also oppressed by the circumstances within her marriage. Mrs. Mallard however suppressed her feelings and of unhappiness and in which the story implies puts stress on her heart. The announcement of her husband death brings on conflicting feelings of grief and joy. Mrs. Mallard paradoxical statement about the death of her husband changes her perception about life. “She breathed a quick prayer that life might be long. It was only yesterday she had thought with a shudder that life might be long.
However, once she retires to her own quarters she continues to decipher the rest of her feelings and in them she discovers joy and freedom. So strong was the overwhelming feeling of joy and freedom that she dies. Of course those feelings weren’t enough to kill her, Mrs. Mallard had a heart disease.
Mrs. Mallard was at first overjoyed with freedom because her husband was supposedly “dead,” yet at the end of the story, Mrs. Mallard comes face to face with Mr. Mallard. A whole new wave of emotions overcame Mrs. Mallard as she laid eyes on her husband instantly killing her from “a heart disease-of joy that kills.” It is ironic how Mrs. Mallard is overjoyed about her husband’s death, and she ended up dying because she found out he was alive instead. Her joy literally was killed, killing her on the inside as
“She knew that she would weep again when she saw the kind, tender hands folded in death; the face that had never looked save with love upon her, fixed and gray and dead. But she saw beyond that bitter moment a long procession of years to come that would belong to her absolutely.” (7) Mrs. Mallard is sad about her husband's death but she is able to see the joy in the situation. “And yet she had loved him—sometimes. Often she had not.
Most women in Mrs Mallard’s situation were expected to be upset at the news of her husbands death, and they would worry more about her heart trouble, since the news could worsen her condition. However, her reaction is very different. At first she gets emotional and cries in front of her sister and her husbands friend, Richard. A little after, Mrs. Mallard finally sees an opportunity of freedom from her husbands death. She is crying in her bedroom, but then she starts to think of the freedom that she now has in her hands. “When she abandoned herse...
Mallard is unhappy with her marriage and feels as though she cannot fulfill her life while with her husband. This is evident when she suddenly feels relieved after hearing the news from her sister saying “Free, free, free!” (157). At first she tries to will the feeling away, but eventually welcomes it. This then leads to her discussing how she will go about the rest of her life now that her husband is ‘dead’. As an example, “There would be no one to live for during those coming years; she would live for herself. There would be no powerful will bending her in that blind persistence with which men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will on a fellow creature” (158). This quote describes how marriage can feel oppressing as partners feel obligated to act in particular ways while married. So, it is evident that she feels weighed down by her husband and as if she has been weighing him down as well. The fact that this theme is common and relatable is why this work is in the category of
Mrs. Mallard is an ill woman who is “afflicted with heart trouble” and had to be told very carefully by her sister and husband’s friend that her husband had died (1609). Her illness can be concluded to have been brought upon her by her marriage. She was under a great amount of stress from her unwillingness to be a part of the relationship. Before her marriage, she had a youthful glow, but now “there was a dull stare in her eyes” (1610). Being married to Mr. Mallard stifled the joy of life that she once had. When she realizes the implications of her husband’s death, she exclaims “Free! Body and soul free!” (1610). She feels as though a weight has been lifted off her shoulders and instead of grieving for him, she rejoices for herself. His death is seen as the beginn...
Her sister, Josephine, broke the news to her “in broken sentences, veiled hints that revealed in half concealing”. After hearing of her husband’s death, Mrs. Mallard locks herself in her room to mourn. She sits in a chair facing an open window and begins to sob. As she sat gazing at an open patch of blue sky, a thought started to come to her. “Free, free, free!” escapes her lips.
Mallard repeatedly says “free, free, free!” this statement tells us that even though her marriage appears to be relatively satisfied, what seems more significant to her is her freedom from her husband. She now realizes that her life is free from anything, beause she was experiencing both physical and emotional cruelty from her supposedly husband. One of the outcomes of her husband’s death is to live for herself. In the story, it says that “There stood, facing the open window, a confortable, roomy rmchair”.
The first reader has a guided perspective of the text that one would expect from a person who has never studied the short story; however the reader makes some valid points which enhance what is thought to be a guided knowledge of the text. The author describes Mrs. Mallard as a woman who seems to be the "victim" of an overbearing but occasionally loving husband. Being told of her husband's death, "She did not hear the story as many women have heard the same, with a paralyzed inability to accept its significance." (This shows that she is not totally locked into marriage as most women in her time). Although "she had loved him--sometimes," she automatically does not want to accept, blindly, the situation of being controlled by her husband. The reader identified Mrs. Mallard as not being a "one-dimensional, clone-like woman having a predictable, adequate emotional response for every life condition." In fact the reader believed that Mrs. Mallard had the exact opposite response to the death her husband because finally, she recognizes the freedom she has desired for a long time and it overcomes her sorrow. "Free! Body and soul free! She kept whispering." We can see that the reader got this idea form this particular phrase in the story because it illuminates the idea of her sorrow tuning to happiness.