Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relationship between buyers and suppliers in a company
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Chapter 2 Literature Review 2.0 Introduction This chapter deals with literature review on the study variables in a buyer-supplier relationship. And focus on how trust, adaptation, commitment, communication and cooperation been selected as variables that will affect buyer’s satisfaction level. 2.1 Buyer-supplier relationship Buyer-supplier relationship established since human beings started to trade goods and services. The relationship developed naturally over time after buyer and supplier developed trust and friendship which was supported by quality of product and services (Wilson. D.T, 1995). The relational development is accelerated as firms attempt to improve their relationship to achieve company goals. At the same time, the expectations in the performance have increased, and this has making the satisfactory relationship became more difficult. As pointed by Parsons A.L (2002), there was increasing dependent on the relationship and customers is demanding to receive high standard of products and services for them to sustain the business in the intense manufacturing environment. Besides, Xu et al. (2008) has highlighted that supplier is developing a long-term relationship with their crucial suppliers to increase the competitiveness and to establish an effective and efficient supply chain. Trend (2005) also mentioned that work closely in partnership with suppliers is the only way to survive in today’s competitive business environment. 2.2 Trust Trust is among the most frequently cited dimensions of C relationships in the literature and has been defined as “the firm’s belief that another company will perform actions that will result in positive actions for the firm, as well as not take unexpected actions that would resu... ... middle of paper ... ...orms in the relationship because both parties are working together toward mutual goal of satisfaction (Siguaw et al., 1998). Previous researchers have shown that there is a positive relationship between cooperation and satisfaction (e.g. Mallen, 1963; Dwyer, 1980; Schmitz Whipple and Gentry, 2000). The cooperative efforts of channel members should results in greater trust, commitment, channel efficiency and the achievement goals, thus leading to higher levels of satisfaction. (Jonsson and Zineldin, 2003). Cooperation increases mutual perceived economic and psychological satisfaction (Geykens et al., 1998; Cannon and Perrault, 1999; Parsons, 2002; Cambra and Polo, 2007) and improve the buyer-supplier bonding. Therefore, I propose H5. Cooperation between the firm and its supplier has a positive influence on the level of satisfaction perceived by industrial buyer.
In line with the above discussion, it should be noted that there is a present shift in the world towards a view of the benefits of collaboration as opposed to the earlier understanding of competitive buyer-seller relationship (Ford, 1990, p. 542). Indeed, if reviewed from a relatively modest start, it can be easily seen that buyer-seller collaboration and relationship marketing has come to be the most valued asset of any company in the business marketing agenda as well as real business practice. Following the past four decades in which the marketing mix view was the most dominant of marketing activities in every aspect of marketing literatures, relationship marketing has gradually established itself as an alternative view of marketing scheme (Blois, 1996).
...ocus here is on the process rather than on the outcome (Das and Teng, 2001). However, the lack of trust, often due to the fear of losing brand reputation, leads to a struggle for greater control. At the inter-firm level, researchers believe that trust is a key element in co-operative relationships (Ring and Van de Ven, 1992; Sydow, 1998). IJVs however remain most vulnerable to failure due to the loss of trust between partners, resulting in a struggle for control and ultimately termination. Das and Teng (2001) set out measures they believe build trust, few of which are implemented in practice:
In such situations, the buying industry often faces a high pressure on margins from their suppliers. The relationship to powerful suppliers can potentially reduce strategic options for the organization.
Breaking of trust to customer will also lead their relationship become worse and the gaps between the customer expectation and actual service received become larger. According to Kassim and Abdullah (2015), their results indicate that both trust and attraction have a significant positive impact on relationship commitment with trust having a strong positive effect, while communication representing the most important determinant of attraction. So, if a company want to retain and increases their customer loyalty they should make sure they have the capabilities to manage and achieve the promises they made with
Partners: Nurture a winning network of customers and suppliers, together we create mutual, enduring value.
Over the last decade, the supply chain management has influence to business all over the globe. Purchasing is one function within supply chain which becomes the most important element to establish value-added products or services. The major aspect of purchasing is supplier selection. It is recognized that selecting appropriate supplier is one of the key success factors of a firm. Selecting the right supplier is always a difficult task for purchasing manager (Liu et al., 2005). Right suppliers selection can lead the company to success and achieve the objectives. On the contrary, wrong supplier selection can lead the company to financial problem. Therefore, purchasing departments need to emphasize about supplier performance evaluation which not only concern one criterion such as price, but also consider of multi criteria for evaluating suppliers in order to select the right supplier.
The notion of power is regarded highly important in an inter-organizational relationship as an organization could use its positive benefits in gaining competitive advantage within its industry (Porter 1985). Organizations build relationships with other organization by tapping into their resources in order to give utmost value to their customers (Fill and Fill 2005:26). These interactions amongst organization are conducted usually in business to business markets where transactions are between the manufacturer and wholesaler or retailer in which there are no or less exchanges with the end customer. It is however, inevitable to avoid conflicts in the process of interactions but positive approaches can be adopted by organizations in reducing frictions
The selection of vendors and suppliers is very important to the company’s sale of ever product. The products that are brought in by the vendors is an important aspect of how the overall quality of the business is. If the supplier or vendor is known for poor quality, they will be passed over because higher quality products are more important long term. Quality is the top priority when determining the criteria for selecting the suppliers and vendors for this business. Other important elements in determining suppliers and venders are the pricing analysis, creditable service, conflict of interest to our business, and ensuring free market competition with the suppliers and venders.
Both from the customer and the company point of view, each customer interaction is part of an iterative learning process (Ballantyne, 2004). Further, Yau et al. (2000) advocated that the relationships between business firms and its customers have been constantly encouraged as successful business practices worldwide. The strategy of relationship marketing is of high relevance particularly in the service industries because of the intangible nature of service and their high level of customer interaction (Al-Hersh, Aburoub, & Saaty, 2014). Relationship marketing is defined as the process of engaging in proactively creating, developing and maintaining committed, interactive and profitable exchanges with targeted customers (Haker, 1999). Furthermore, Gronroos (1990) asserted that relationship marketing is to establish, maintain, enhance and commercialise customer relationship so that the objectives of the parties involved are met which can be done by a mutual exchange and fulfillment of promises. Moreover, the implementation of the relationship marketing concept at the operational level refers to relationship marketing orientation (Hau & Ngo, 2012). Relationship marketing orientation indicates the firms’ philosophy of doing business concerning relationship building by propagating developing trust, empathy, bonding, and reciprocity between a firm and its customers (Sin et al., 2005a, b; Tse et al., 2004). Trust is an important element for a successful relationship between the firm and its customers (Berry, 1995). First, trust is an essential component for a successful relationship between the firm and its customers (Berry, 1995). Trust It refers to a willingness to rely on an exchange partner in whom one has confidence (Morgan & Hunt, 1994). Empathy, as a dimension of business relationship, enables the two parties to see the situation from
Building strong customer relationships is a method for competitive advantage (McKenya 1991; Reichheld 1993). In services marketing, relationship marketing between business and customers are especially important since the nature of interpersonal interactions, and the relative less objective in measuring service quality. Relationship benefits are usually discussed from both firm and customer perspectives. From services providers’ perspective, strong relationships with customers offer a loyal customer base for the firm, thus leads to predictable sales (Maker 1992) and low customers’ turnover (Reichheld and Sasser 1990). From customers’ perspective, relationship benefits to customers refer to the benefits customer can receive
(2014) deduced that procurement performance can be assessed by focusing ondelivery,flexibility, quality, cost and technology. Optimal performance attainment is dependent onhow current suppliers`relationships aremanaged so asto ensure constant availability of needed quality supplies at the organization. This will ensure that sourced materials are indeed procured at the right costand atthe right time. Procurement performancestrives toenable improvements in the procurement process at the organizationso as to improve on qualitydelivery of firm products and servicesatleast possible time and
Commitment Theory - Trust is suggested by demonstrating that trust and commitment are two main aspects for measuring the relationship quality. By integrating the perspectives of different researches, quality is measured in terms of trust, commitment, culture, interdependence, and contact. Although there is no agreement on the components of the relationship quality, generally, satisfaction and trust have been accepted as two important factors for measuring the relationship (Chakrabarty et al, 2007). Service providers can make long-term and stable relationships with their customers through customer satisfaction and trust and ultimately attract their loyalty. Therefore, in this research, the focus is on trust and satisfaction from the customer's perspective and the relationship quality. Creating customer loyalty is the most important goal of conducting relationship marketing activities. Oliver (1997, p. 3) defines customer loyalty as "a profound commitment to a product or service that leads to repeat purchase of brand or the set of the brand in the future, surely with situational factors and marketing efforts that
Supplier relationship management is the process that defines how a hotel interacts with its suppliers. As the name suggests, this is a mirror image of guest relationship management, because a hotel needs to foster relationships with its suppliers too. As in the case of guest relationship management, a hotel will forge close relationships with a small subset of its suppliers, and manage arm-length relationships with others. A contract is negotiated with each key supplier that defines the terms of the relationship. For segments of less critical suppliers, the contract is not negotiable. Supplier relationship management is about defining and managing these contracts. Long-term relationships are developed with a small core group of suppliers. The desired outcome is a win-win relationship where both parties benefit.
A company’s relationship with key suppliers is a vital part of any company’s success. A good supplier relation means better price, meeting company standards and a better service level. That 's why when Honda started working with Modine, Honda made sure that its relationship with Modine was
Trust is most important in the business. Satisfy the customer and build his trust. For it there should be very confidence in your dealing with customer. If you are not confident then you are not good dealer. And don’t tell the customer something wrong about the products so that if he shops from your company then your product will dissatisfy him and in future it did not come to again. Don’t keep anything hidden from the