Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)

1188 Words3 Pages

If passed by Congress, Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) will provide protection for the LBGT community who are currently not covered by state laws or by the narrow protections Title VII may provide. Research has shown that discrimination against LBGT people is real and has a significant impact on their lives from being hired, passed up for promotions, and even preventing them from earning an income equal to their heterosexual counterparts. ENDA will give these individuals an opportunity to live open lives and a fair chance to compete in the workforce without fear of discrimination. It may also help decrease some of the mental health issues caused from the stressful social environment. Based on a nationally represented sample from a …show more content…

815 – Employment Non-Discrimination Act of 2013 was passed by the Senate on November 11, 2013. The bill as it is currently written prohibits employers with 15 or more employees from discriminating against an individual based on an their actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity. The bill also protects those who are discriminated against for associating with LGBT persons. The bill models Title Vll, ADA, and ADEA in that employers are prohibited from failing or refusing to hire, terminating, or discriminating against an employee with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because of their actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity. They are also prohibited from retaliating against an employee or engaging in practices that could adversely affect these individuals. Employment agencies are prohibited from failing or refusing to refer an individual for employment because of their actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity. Employers are also prohibited from discriminating against these individuals from denying admission or employment in training programs, including on the job training. (S.815, 2013-2014; Bennett-Alexander, D. & Hartman, L, …show more content…

Douglas Marshall-Steele (Deleware), a registered nurse, was fired shortly after contacting administration to report anti-gay statements and behavior by one of the doctor’s on staff. After an investigation, it was found that the doctor was also sexually harassing female nurses. Doug was able to file a suit with EEOC stating the hospital retaliated against him for reporting the anti-gay comments and eventually settled out of court. In this case Doug prevailed, but if the remarks had been limited to sexual orientation, Doug would have had no legal recourse to proceed because at the time, Delaware did not have laws to protect workplace discrimination. (Vagins,

Open Document