Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
motivation theories in the workplace
motivation theories in the workplace
the relationship between motivation and employee performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: motivation theories in the workplace
Employee Motivation What motivates employees today? This is an increasing concern to managers today because the definition of motivation is a very complex. One cannot actually define motivation but can give theories to better explain it. In this paper, I am going to talk about some of the major theories and factors that affect motivation at the job. The first theory is the two-factor theory which was suggested by Fred Herzberg. "Herzberg was one of the first to suggest a model of the motivational properties of task design based on his two-factor theory of satisfaction." (Mowday & Steers) The study he conducted found that factors that led to satisfaction were different from those factors that led to dissatisfaction. For Herzberg's theory the two factors that effect motivation in the workforce are motivator factors and hygiene factors. Motivator factors, which were determined to be the satisfiers, dealt with the content of the job such as advancement, recognition, responsibility, and achievement. The dissatisfiers or hygiene factors pertained to job security, policies, working conditions, relationships with personnel. So according to Mowday and Steers, if one wishes to improve motivation and satisfaction, jobs should be designed to allow greater scope for personal achievement and recognition, more challenging and responsible work, and increased opportunities for advancement and growth. The second theory is the expectancy theory which explains motivation based on the employee receiving rewards. The most widely used version of the expectancy theory is that suggested by Vi... ... middle of paper ... ...s the "measurability of individual performance, degree of goal clarity, and degree of job challenge." (Perry & Porter) Work environment characteristics include immediate work environment and organizational actions. External environment characteristics can be divided into six major categories. These are socionormative, political, demographic, economic, and technological. According to Perry and Porter, if motivation is to be affected, one or more of these variables must be changed or affected. In conclusion, there are many theories on how to motivate employees and one must determine which one is the best by assessing the situation and the individual. One must also take into consideration the factors affecting motivation.
He was the first to show that factors causing job satisfaction were different from that causing job dissatisfaction. He developed the motivation-hygiene theory; he called the satisfying factors motivators and the dissatisfying hygiene factors. According to Sapru (2013), the two factor theory is a theory that relates to intrinsic factors to job satisfaction, while associating extrinsic factors with dissatisfaction. To find the individual’s relation and attitude to work, Herzberg investigated the question: “What do people want from their job?” According to Hertzberg certain attributes tend to be consistently related to job satisfaction and other to job dissatisfaction. For instance, intrinsic factors such as responsibilities, achievement, recognition and advancement seem related to job satisfaction. While, extrinsic factors such as pay, working conditions, policies and supervision seems related to job dissatisfaction.
Motivation of employees is important to any organization’s success. The process of work motivation can initiate performance of employees (Clark, 2003). The best approach to fostering motivation has shown to be the satisfaction of the employees (Heathfield, 2014). Employees are more likely to engage in work when they know what to expect from the work, are given the resources to complete the tasks, are given ample opportunities to grow their own knowledge and within the company, have moderate feedback about their work, and feel like they are an asset to the organization (Shuck, & Wollard, 2008). Also, companies must be sure to avoid things like unfairness and other elements that deter motivation.
.... One of the significant features of this motivation theory is that it eases to explain employee motivation with clear guidelines. According to the motivation model people`s effort derived from 3 factors:
In my opinion, the most imaginable way to motivate worker can be paying more to whom that marked the better result. It is easy to evaluate person’s work if it is in a sales department, since you can obviously see the sales result with the numbers and you can pay extra for their rewards. However, of course it is not that easy in the real situation in the work place. Since motivating people depends on the person and the situation. In this part, I will discuss how motivation related to effective performance based on the textbook. In terms of the reasons manager should motivate workers, the Expectancy theory, and the bucket analogy.
Once hired, in order to retain competent employees, management can use many tools. One of the tools at their disposal is Expectancy Theory, first suggested by Yale University Professor Victor H. Vroom. As explained by Brian Redmond and Shaun Miller (2013), the theory suggests that an individual's perceived view of an outcome will determine the level of motivation. Some employees are motivated by money, while others prefer recognition for a job well done, a corner office, or the parking space closest to the building. Each person is different. Therefore, no one size fits all solution will work.
Psychologist Frederick Herzberg contends that “if we want to motivate people on their jobs, emphasize factors associated with the work itself or to outcomes directly derived from it.
-formed by Frederick Herzberg in 1959 states that there are 2 factors that motivate a person to work. This is also known as Motivation-Hygiene theory. Herzberg’s 2 factor theory states there are factors in the workplace that causes job satisfaction, and a separate factor that causes dissatisfaction.(MacRae & Furnham, 2017). Hygiene factors are factors that are basic for the motivation to exist in an organization these includes salary, company policies, working environment and interpersonal relationships (Management Study Guide, 2013). In short, these are factors that conciliates workers,for them not to be dissatisfied (Management Study Guide, 2013). On the other hand, Motivation factors are factors that pleases or gratifies
Surviving the existing competition and remaining profitable and relevant in the market is a challenge faced by every enterprise. In order to achieve this, different methodologies are available for use by different companies. One such avenue, which is probably the most productive, is the motivation of employees. Motivation refers to the creation of a friendly environment and provision of conditions that challenge the workforce to be better at their job. This ensures that the productivity is maximum, and the set goals and objectives are achieved with ease. In this accord, the role of employee motivation in the modern management cannot be overemphasized.
Motivation is an important function in organizations to motivate their employees for their ability to perform well, improving their skills, increasing productivity, job satisfaction and employee extension. Employees also are not a machines that we could just program their task in their brain and they will do it automatically, they require motivation to actually do their job properly. And so, after discussing the process models of the Maslow’s “Hierarchy of needs”, Douglas McGregor theory X and Y, and also the Herzberg’s “two factor motivation hygiene theory.” understanding the ways of motivating people, the human nature, and the substance of nature. I believe that the true motivation can only come from within and also managers can actually motivate all of their employees.
When it is discovered that a worker can fulfill the requirements of their job, but are experiencing shortcomings in doing so, many times it is believed that worker motivation may be the root of the problem (Laird 95). What, though, is work motivation? According to Laird (2006), “motivation is a fundamental component of performance “ and “is the reason that someone chooses to do some things and chooses not to do others”. In other words, work motivation is what energizes workers to the level of output required to fulfill a task, directs their energy towards the objectives that they need to accomplish, and sustains that level of effort over a period of time (Steers et al., 2004). In essence, worker motivation is what gets the job done. Employee motivation has always been a central problem in the workplace, and, as an individual in a supervisory position, it becomes ones duty to understand and institute systems that ensure the proper motivation of your subordinates. Proper motivation of employees can ensure high productivity and successful workflow, while low worker motivation can result in absenteeism, decreased productivity rates, and turnover. A large body of research has been produced regarding motivation, and much of this research is applicable to the workplace. Due to the nature of man, motivation varies from individual to individual, and, because of this, there is no one system that is the best for ensuring worker motivation in every organizational situation, and, as a product, many theories have been created to outline what drives people to satisfactorily complete their work tasks. Throughout the course of this document, the three main types of these motivational theories will be outlined and examples of each as well...
...vation of their employees. All the theories brought forth regarding employee motivation rotate on the need to make sure that employees are fully satisfied by offering both monetary and non-monetary incentives such as training, promotion and a safe working environment. It is often difficult for employees to devote themselves and engage fully in teamwork activities whenever their leaders favor some of their counterparts while showing bias against others. As the Two Factor Theory puts it, employee satisfaction and dissatisfaction have to be handled separately to ensure that the right measures are initiated whenever there are challenges that jeopardize the prospect of organizations attaining their goals. It is therefore the role of managers to make the environment of their workplaces ethical to attain the level of motivation needed to make employees perform effectively.
Motivating employees is an important skill for supervisors, managers, and business owners to have. When developing motivation plans, it is important to recognize the individual differences among employees and realize that not all motivation techniques will work for everyone. Each employee must be evaluated to determine what motivates them the most. Below are three techniques that can be used by the supervisor in motivating his employees in the international market.
What is motivation? Motivation is difficult to explain and even harder to 'turn on' in people. Webster defines motivation as ?an act or process of motivating; the condition of being motivated; a force, stimulus, or influence: incentive or drive? (?Motivation?). It is most often the job of the manager to use motivation to drive employees to accomplish acts which they normally would not have done. The study of motivation helps managers understand what prompts people to initiate action, what influences their choice of action, and why they persist in their action over time (Daft and Marcic 444). Over the years many theorists have studied the human condition of motivation, and learned various techniques to help managers figure out what makes employees seek to attain higher knowledge, wealth, prosperity, and happiness in their work.
Dwight D. Eisenhower once said, “Motivation is the art of getting people to do what you want them to do because they want to do it.” Studies have found that high employee motivation goes hand in hand with strong organizational performance and profits. Therefore, managers are given the responsibility of finding the right combination of motivational techniques and rewards to satisfy employees’ needs and encourage great work performance. This becomes a bit more challenging as employees’ needs change from one generation to another. Three of the biggest challenges a manager faces in motivating employees today are the economy and threats to job security, technological advances, and company cultures that primarily focus on the bottom line.
Essential changes in the world of management are being experienced in an arbitrary routine. To muddle through such changes, prominence is laid increasingly on individual proficiencies and outcomes. Changes experienced in technology and organization structures at work in recent times require managers and alternatively top officials to improve on their interpersonal skills, and the ever increasing significance of the customer leading to an explosion of practices, techniques and principles that work (Allison, 2006). However, the modern world of management falls short of maintaining an economically favorable balance of productivity against loss costs. Arguably, the most effective albeit most neglected means of motivation requires only occasional genuine demonstrations of management concern and interest coupled with the provision of remedial or corrective actions. In the management world, motivation may be used to refer to the entirety of psychological motives that inducts and directs an employee's behavior in the direction of a goal or objective where the attainment and accomplishment of the goal is equivalent to meeting a need or necessity felt by that person (Certo et al, 2006).