Importance of Conducting a Thorough Background Check on Employees Is it necessary to conduct employee background checks? This remains one of the major questions asked by numerous employees throughout the years. In case your firm is starting its recruitment process, this question might be at the very front line of your mind. Recent studies have revealed that there is a rising trend in carrying out background checks on prospective employees. However, what has brought about this growing trend. In this article, we take a look at some of the reasons why it is important to conduct a thorough background check on employees. Reveal relevant criminal records The main reason most hiring managers run background checks on employees is to reveal any criminal …show more content…
In any case, it is essential that employers have these criminal records to come to a conclusion on the hiring decision. Ensure that the employee is qualified Conducting a background check is more than simply investigating criminal records. Verification and reference checks remain a vital aspect of background checks. This may include checking with colleges, universities, as well as certification programs to ensure that a candidate has the degrees and expert licenses being presented. In any case, these verification and reference checks are a vital and critical approach to ensure that a candidate meets all requirements for a position as stated in their resume. With a thorough screening, you will be able to sniff out the fibs, differentiating honest applicants, from the ones that are not. Protect other workers and clients. Another reason for conducting background checks could be that they help to safeguard the work environment. Careless procuring cases can be dangerous and can harm an organization. Hiring a person with a violent, assault, or criminal rape record may put both other employees and customers at risk. The best way to protect your workers and clients is by conducting a thorough background
The use of criminal record databases by employers has greatly increased since the 1990s when the information first became relevant (Appelbaum, 2015). The biggest rise in background searches began after the terrorist attacks in New York City on September 11, 2001. Mr. Uggen, a criminologist at the University of Minnesota, states that there is a problem with criminal background checks considering most employers have no idea what they should be looking for. With every business owner having different concerns about potential applicants, “we haven’t really figured out what a disqualifying offense should be for particular activities (Appelbaum,
In the area of Background Investigations the FBI manages checks on anyone who applies for positions with the Department of Energy, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Department of Justice, and the FBI its self. When conducting these investigations on applicants the FBI will interview past neighbors, and coworkers of those who apply. Also they will check their criminal records and credit history. Doing so ...
The “Ban the Box” is a law that took effect on January 1, 2014, and it inhibits companies from asking about a potential employee’s criminal history on the initial applications for employment (Deitchler, Fliegel, Fitzke, & Mora, 2013). The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) endorsed this Ban the Box in that its contemplation of criminal history of arrests or convictions in the Title Ⅶ of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Deitchler, Fliegel, Fitzke, & Mora, 2013). It is directly related to employer’s ability to hire those employees with a criminal past to be compliant with the fair employment requirements. Employers have a balancing act to perform because they should be aware of risks related to negligent hiring. In the case of litigation
ttps://newrepublic.com/article/118286/facts-about-gun-control-and-universal-background-checks "firearms are used in about 31,000 deaths per year." Thesis: The Judicial branch of government should make a law that requires any person who wants to purchase a firearm have a mandatory background check and be put through a class to learn how to keep their firearms from getting into the hands of the wrong people.
Numerous departments use a polygraph, usually known as lie detector, to verify information submitted throughout the application process. Drug tests are routinely administered to check for the presence of illegal substances. Each agency establishes the type of test. Background investigators will review your employment history, character references, academic records, residency history, credit history and criminal history. Applicants can assume to take some sort of physical ability test during the hiring process.
Capital One is a financial institution and handles confidential information for customers. Employees have access to this information and the company is liable for any misuse of customer information. Therefore a background check must be done for every employee. “In addition to ensuring job qualifications, conducting background checks can help employers protect themselves and the public from individuals who pose an unreasonable risk of harm and may shield employers from potential negligent hiring lawsuits.” (Dwoskin, 2013) The applicants’ information is run through the screening software. The software runs the applicants’ information through the Department of Correction database. It searches for any criminal history or charges and reports it back to the recruiter. If the background comes back clear then the applicant is hired. If the background comes back with some information that was not listed on the application, the legal team would need to research further.
There are certain instances in which you can seal your criminal records so they can't be viewed by outside sources including employers. This makes it easier to get a job when they're doing background checks. There are many benefits to sealing your record. In some states, a record can be expunged, but not in New York. The only option for New York residents is to get their record sealed.
One of the most important decisions that an organization can make is the hiring of prospective employees. It is illogical for an organization to employ an individual that cannot perform their assigned duty. Why would any organization spend large sum of money in training an individual that will not be beneficial to their organization. Therefore, it is reasonable for organizations to filter out the undesirable applicants. According to Dessler (2011) once an organization have a group of applicants, their next stage is to decide on the best person for the job. Normally this means reducing the applicant pool via screening methods such as tests, background checks, and interviews.
Another type of privacy invasion is the background check of a potential employee. Businesses only want employees who will benefit the business itself. The owners think of employees as a type of investment. So, to make a good investment, the managers are ordered to conduct a background check on prospective applicants.
With many cases already being filed by the EEOC will provide some sort of guidance on how a company can more thoroughly conduct background screenings on their candidates and current employees. A company should have the right to conduct background screenings on their employees and potential candidates anytime they desire. Having the government interfere on how an employer can hire an employee interferes with our capitalistic economy. Background screenings are sometimes even crucial to a companies bottom line when taking into consideration of certain costs like insurance. Some insurance company’s will not cover certain potential liabilities for an organization if they have an employee with a criminal history. For example, a trucking company’s insurance policy may state that they will not cover any accidental damages if they have an employee who has a past arrest for driving under the influence and is operating one of their fleet vehicles. A background check I believe is a necessity when hiring employees and even screening current employees at random. This provides a strong structure of internal controls for an organization, and helps reduce a possibility of law suits and loss of capital for an
In addition, to being unable to pay fines or bail, having a criminal record also limits a person’s ability to find employment and a
anything to affect the safety or property of the people. This is exactly why background checks should be
Job skills and training can even be investigated by the employer. The employee is to perform services and these services must be done in a certain manner. Someone who is incoherent because of drug abuse cannot be a pilot for example. This is why employers can test to see if characteristics or tendencies would affect performance. An employee may not want to give a urine or blood sample. The employee may not want to include all of their references but this is besides the fact that an employer is entitled to them. More and more employers are starting to feel this way. "A 1996 survey by the American Management Association found 81 percent of major U.S. companies had drug-testing programs at that time compared with 78 percent in 1995 and just 22 percent in 1987." (May 2) The employer has a right to only certain information and the line must also be drawn in the procedure to obtain the information.
middle of paper ... ... It is so important to make sure the information is accurate because this information can be critical in a criminal case and will be used in court if needed. Grover, G. (2002). Career Information Center eighth edition, computers, business and office.
The Federal Government Should Pass Legislation Banning Employers from Asking About Criminal Convictions on Initial Job Applications