Education Literature Review and Analysis

2000 Words4 Pages

SUMMARY OF ARTICLES
ARTICLE 1
Andrew Y. H. Tse (2012) Self-access Language Learning for Malaysian University Students, English Language Teaching, 5:12, 163-166, DOI: 10.5539/elt.v5n12p163
Commonly, in Malaysia, university students depend on lecture notes and their lecturers for learning English. It is also stated that teacher-centred is still widely used rather than student-centred. Therefore, the use of self-access language learning is believed to be one of the effective learning modes for the Malaysian university students. The objective of this study is to investigate if self-access learning can promote self-directed or autonomous learning in public Malaysian technical university. There are two research questions 1) Will university students accept the notion of self-access learning? 2) Is it difficult to promote self-access learning in Malaysian universities? This study involved all University Malaysia Pahang (UMP) students in Gambang, especially first year students. The result of this will benefit students, lecturers, educators, government officials and researchers. However, the result shows that university students do not accept self-access learning. It is found that it is difficult to promote self-access learning in Malaysian universities as the students cannot see its benefits to them. The educators also refuse to see its impacts to the students and still rely on formal traditional classroom teaching. Nevertheless, the students and lecturers do not deny that self-access learning centre is beneficial for the learning process. The researcher recommended that Malaysia Ministry of Education should set up self-access language learning centre in every university to help the learners learn English in a more encouraging environment....

... middle of paper ...

...judged in terms of the authors’ purpose in writing it. Ideally, in the future, there should be more studies related to the research fields of all the three articles so that it can benefit all the parties that are involved in their respective field.

REFERENCES

Bogdan, R. C. and Biklen, S. K. 2003. Qualitative research in education, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Hatch, J. A. 2002. Doing qualitative research in education settings, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Huberman, M. 1993. The lives of teachers, New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Hyener, R. H. (1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies, 8(3), 279-303.
McMillan, J. H. and Schumacher, S. 2010. Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry, Boston, MA: Pearson.
Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Open Document