Dulce Et Decorum Est And Who's For The Game Analysis

507 Words2 Pages

Your home, your country. Standing tall through the test of time. But how far would you go to make ensure that happens? Would you even go as far to fight in its wars? Today we will look a two author’s perspectives on war, in “Dulce et Decorum Est” and “Who’s for the Game”. Each will give differing views on the intense seriousness, and pride for war and its debated morals.
“Who’s for the Game” by Jessie Pope, presents a light and excited tone towards supporting your country via war. This patriotic view is first presented by discussing war as if it were a game. This is shown in the first line; “Who’s for the game, the biggest that’s played”. This presents a persuasive tone towards the simplicity and playfulness of war. It then goes on to push and persuade its …show more content…

It displays a darker tone from the point of view of a soldier in the midst of the battlefield. It first depicts a bleak and depressing scene of war. “And towards our distant rest began to trudge. Men marched asleep. Many had lost their boots but limped on, blood-shod.” This shows that the author does not support war, and is using descriptive language to persuade the reader. It goes on to describe a situation where the death of a soldier is witnessed; “But someone still was yelling out and stumbling and flound’ring like a man in fir or lime... As under a green sea, I saw him drowning.” This dark mood shows the seriousness of war, and how the author wants to demonstrate the dangers of war. The author then concludes the poem with the line, “Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori”. In doing so he call this the “Old lie”, implying that the statement, translating to “It is sweet and right to die for your country.” Is completely false, and that it is not right to go as far as to die for your nation. This piece is trying to depict the harsh realities of war, and goes so far as to shoot down patriotic beliefs supporting

Open Document