Dr. Strangelove: A Critical Analysis Of Stanley Kubrick's Nuclear War

1309 Words3 Pages

On April 7, 1946, Dwight D. Eisenhower used the term "domino principle" for the first time. His exact words were: “You have broader considerations that might follow what you would call the ‘falling domino’ principle. You have a row of dominoes set up, you knock over the first one, and what will happen to the last one is the certainty that it will go over very quickly”.
A journalist had asked the president about the strategic importance of Indochina in the world. Then, the president answered saying that there were three reasons for its importance: the raw materials in Indochina that the world needed; the possibility that many human beings pass under a dictatorship that was inimical to, what he called, the free world; and finally, he mentioned …show more content…

This particular statement establishes, from my point of view, an interesting connection with Stanley Kubrick's 1964 film Dr. Strangelove: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb. In Kubrick's film, Dr. Strangelove is a former Nazi scientist and adviser to the president. Probably, Kubrick called his film in this way because this character could symbolize the scientific “progress” that the development of this bomb involved. But, apart from this, it is interesting the connection that can be established between the title How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb with the declaration of the president saying that the bomb could be applied to peacetime uses. In some way, the fact that people thought that it was possible that the bomb could be applied in peacetime and that it could bring some benefit means, as Kubrick says, that they would be learning to love the …show more content…

Initially, the Viet Minh considered that collaborating with the United States was necessary to achieve independence. However, the United States contributed to the French war effort. After the French withdrawal, Vietnam separated into two different states. It was assumed that these two states would make a referendum in order to achieve their reunification or their definitive separation. But this referendum never happened and the Second Indochina War, also known as the Vietnam War, began. In this war, as Robert Nixon said in his Address to the Nation of November 3, 1969, “President Eisenhower sent economic aid and military equipment to assist the people of South Vietnam in its efforts to prevent a Communist takeover. Seven years ago, President Kennedy sent 16,000 military personnel to Vietnam as combat advisers. Four years ago, President Johnson sent American combat forces to South Vietnam”. In other words, this means that many governments, including Eisenhower’s one, participated in this dispute. Nevertheless, Nixon – as well as Eisenhower – considered the intervention of the United States in this war necessary to defeat global communism. This is observable in the following statement in the previously mentioned Nixon’s speech: “For the South Vietnamese, our precipitate withdrawal would inevitably allow the Communists to repeat the massacres which followed their takeover in the North 15

Open Document