Essay On The Atomic Bomb

analytical Essay

1722 words

World War II brought up many new technologies for warfare. Advanced on existing developments such as weaponry, ships, vehicles air crafts, navigational devices and medicine are just a few broad examples of developments in warfare during this time in United States and World history. One development, however, changed the entire way of warfare. The Atomic bomb was developed during this time out of fears that the Germans had the same technologies, or at least were working to obtain it. Once the United States had this technological capability of producing atomic weapons, the way of fighting was changed. Two bombs were dropped on Japan in August of 1945, one on the city of Hiroshima and the other on the city of Nagasaki. Afterward, the ear of atomic diplomacy came up in American international relations, which as we have seen today, has led to the development of even stronger, more deadly weaponry and bombs. The bombing of Japan also brings up the still prevalent debate of whether the bombings were justifiable or not. Historians Gar Alperovitz, Robert P. Newman and Barton Bernstein all have written essays expressing their opinions in the matter. Gar Alperovitz writes an essay completely against the bombing in Japan, feeling that it was, as said in his essay tile, neither necessary nor justifiable. Lives were ultimately not saved like it has been the belief for years and there were many options not considered or over looked just because the government wanted a quick end to the war, important considerations like the state of Japan and the fact that they were on the verge of surrender. Robert Newman, in his essay, feels the exact opposite. Newman believed that the bombings were perfectly justifiable, considering the deaths caused by Jap... ... middle of paper ... ... Japanese hands. It is also believed that American lives were subsequently saved. However, there is evidence other wise. It is very true that the bombings were not racist, after all, the bombs, if developed sooner would have very likely been used on Germany if needed be. But even with this in mind, it is very cure in in humane along with an out of perportion action taking to an issue that could have very well solved itself withing in the matter of days. Were American lives saved, yes. Were the “bad Japs” defeated and stopped, yes. But it is neglected that alog with the emperial army, an equal amout ofd innocent civilians were killed, some instantly, and some from bunr wounds and contact with nuclea gasses, a fate that plagued Japan for years to come. Other opeiton of warfae could have been considered and live, not just americans, could have been spared as a result.

In this essay, the author

Explains that world war ii brought up many new technologies for warfare. the atomic bomb was developed out of fears that the germans had the same technologies.
Analyzes how gar alperovitz, robert newman, and barton bernstein argue that the bombing in japan was unjustifiable.
Analyzes how gar alperovitz and bernstein's essay "dropping the atomic bomb was neither necessary or justifiable" could have been utilized in the conquering of japan

Explains that world war ii brought up many new technologies for warfare. the atomic bomb was developed out of fears that the germans had the same technologies.
Analyzes how gar alperovitz, robert newman, and barton bernstein argue that the bombing in japan was unjustifiable.
Analyzes how gar alperovitz and bernstein's essay "dropping the atomic bomb was neither necessary or justifiable" could have been utilized in the conquering of japan
Opines that american and japanese lives could have been saved if other tactics were considered.
Analyzes how robert p. newman, in his essay "dropping the bomb was necessary and justifiable", strongly agrees with the bombings.
Describes the manhattan project, a comity of scientists whose goal was to quickly research and develop an atomic bomb.
Analyzes newman's argument that the bombings were not raced fuled, stating that they would have been considered in the defeat of germany.

Click here to unlock this and over one million essays

Continue Reading Check Writing Quality

Harness the Power of AI to Boost Your Grades!

Haven't found what you were looking for? Talk to me, I can help!

Use of the Atomic Bomb Against Japan was Justified
argumentative essay
The use of the atomic bomb against Japan was completely justified in both cause and impact. An intense weapon was necessary to force a quick Japanese surrender. The bomb saved thousands upon thousands of American and Japanese lives that would have been lost if the war continued or an invasion occurred. The bomb was the only way to end the suffering of the millions who were being held captive by the Japanese oppressor. The weapon of mass destruction also sent a powerful message to the shaky Soviet allies. The choice to use the atomic bomb was justified because it compelled a Japanese surrender, saved countless lives, served as retribution for the sufferings of many people, and acted as an anti-Soviet deterrent.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the use of the atomic bomb against japan was justified because it compelled a japanese surrender, saved countless lives and acted as an anti-soviet deterrent.
- Explains that japan was unwilling to surrender and ready to wage a suicidal resistance if they could not get the terms they wanted.
- Analyzes how the atomic bomb saved an enormous amount of american and japanese lives.
- Explains that the use of the atomic bomb against japan was justified because it compelled a japanese surrender, saved countless lives and acted as an anti-soviet deterrent.
- Explains that japan was unwilling to surrender and ready to wage a suicidal resistance if they could not get the terms they wanted.
- Analyzes how the atomic bomb saved an enormous amount of american and japanese lives.
- Opines that the atomic bomb was the answer for direct revenge against the cruel japanese militarists.
- Explains that the bomb served as a powerful anti-soviet deterrent to the shaky soviet allies. the bomb was an extraordinary tool in international diplomacy.
- Concludes that the decision to drop the atomic bomb against japan was justified because it coerced a japanese surrender, saved countless lives, and acted as an anti-soviet deterrent.
1127 words
Read More
The Consequences Of Hiroshima In America's Hiroshima By Peter Scchwenger
analytical essay
At 8:15 AM on August 6th of 1945 an atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, killing more than 75,000 people. Not only did the 10,000 pound atomic bomb change the innocence of America, it also changed how millions of people view war. To this day, people still have bittersweet feelings about what the United States did to Japan. Some say that the atomic bomb saved many American lives and others argue that it was unnecessary and immoral. While many deaths and injuries occurred in Japan, America was afflicted by the Hiroshima bombing whether people agree or disagree. In the article America’s Hiroshima, Peter Schwenger describes how the United States was affected by Hiroshima, and what followed after the event.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the 10,000-pound atomic bomb on hiroshima changed the innocence of america and how millions of people view war.
- Analyzes how peter schwinger's article argues that america has lost its innocence and that hiroshima will never be forgotten by the people because it will always have a spot in history.
- Analyzes how americans were drowning in propaganda to the point that made the situation seem as if they were only attacking the enemy.
- Analyzes how the 10,000-pound atomic bomb on hiroshima changed the innocence of america and how millions of people view war.
- Analyzes how peter schwinger's article argues that america has lost its innocence and that hiroshima will never be forgotten by the people because it will always have a spot in history.
- Analyzes how americans were drowning in propaganda to the point that made the situation seem as if they were only attacking the enemy.
- Explains that the books gave americans a sense of the terrible human cost, and allowed them to see the japanese as human.
- Analyzes how the article introduces the atomic bomb victim and the pilot of the plane who drooped the first bomb on hiroshima.
- Analyzes how schwinger states that if america mourns nothing else, it must mourn, at some level, a loss of innocence, emphasizing that america has crossed the line and is at the point where it cannot come back
- Analyzes how the situation of hiroshima was a result of "disneyfication" and how that caused americans to misrepresent the events.
- Explains that peter schwinger is an english emeritus professor at the university of mount st. vincent university.
- Opines that the bombing of hiroshima is one of those events that can’t be forgotten because of how horrendous and tragic the results were.
966 words
Read More
Justification of the Atomic Bomb
opinion essay
On August 6, 1945, the United States of America dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan. For a considerable amount of time, there have been debates and arguments about whether or not dropping the bomb was justified.. The United States was indeed justified because of the attacks by Japan on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, which happened three years before the atomic bomb falling on Hiroshima. It was important to stop the war as soon as the US could because it spared many American, and Allied lives. Until that point in World War Two, there had never been any battle that took place in the US. Women, men, and children had no reason to stress over being killed in their own country until the date that lays dark in US history, December 7, 1941, the ambush of Pearl Harbor. On that day, the Japanese brought forth and aerial attack featuring 423 planes, touching base in Pearl Harbor, which lead to the death 2,403 and wounding 1,178. Hitting eighteen American ships, it almost completely disabled the United States Navy in one day. Unknown to many citizens, the attack obliterated 180 fighter planes utilized as a part of the US Air Force. Due to the unjustified Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, it is without a doubt that the atomic bombs falling on Hiroshima, and Nagasaki, Japan, were indeed justified.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the united states dropped the atomic bomb on hiroshima, japan, on august 6, 1945. it was justified because of the attacks by japan on pearl harbor, which happened three years before.
- Opines that the united states was correct in attacking hiroshima with the atomic bomb because of the unannounced strike on citizens and the american naval fleet at pearl harbor.
- Explains that the war had never been fought on american soil before pearl harbor — there were no threats from japan or any nation to launch an attack on america. the us invested millions of dollars on developing the atomic bomb, which saved hundreds of thousands of lives.
- Explains that the united states dropped the atomic bomb on hiroshima, japan, on august 6, 1945. it was justified because of the attacks by japan on pearl harbor, which happened three years before.
- Opines that the united states was correct in attacking hiroshima with the atomic bomb because of the unannounced strike on citizens and the american naval fleet at pearl harbor.
- Explains that the war had never been fought on american soil before pearl harbor — there were no threats from japan or any nation to launch an attack on america. the us invested millions of dollars on developing the atomic bomb, which saved hundreds of thousands of lives.
- Explains that after the attacks on pearl harbor, the united states resolve was thumped. they began dealing with the manhattan project, where they investigated and made atomic weapons.
- Compares the battles in okinawa and mainland japan and concludes that dropping atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki was justified.
861 words
Read More
The Atomic Bombs
analytical essay
As World War 2, came to a close, The United States unleashed a secret atomic weapon upon the enemy nation of Japan that was quickly recognized as the most powerful wartime weapon in human history. They completely destroyed the entire Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and essentially vaporized countless innocent Japanese lives. Some historians believe that it was a foolish, brutal decision to use the atomic bomb on a weakened Japan, and that the civilians of the country did not deserve that kind of mass-annihilation. On the opposite side, other historians assert that dropping the bomb saved countless American and Japanese lives by ending the war faster than a regular invasion would have. What is undisputed is that this sad event dramatically changed the course of human history.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the united states unleashed a secret atomic weapon upon the enemy nation of japan that was quickly recognized as the most powerful wartime weapon in human history.
- Analyzes how truman's decision to use the atomic bomb was the most difficult decision of his life.
- Argues that atomic bombs should have been dropped on iwo jima to demonstrate its power before dropping them on innocent japanese civilians. they argue that president truman was just showing the united states’ nuclear power to the soviets, making the nuclear arms race that followed world war 2.
- Explains that the united states unleashed a secret atomic weapon upon the enemy nation of japan that was quickly recognized as the most powerful wartime weapon in human history.
- Analyzes how truman's decision to use the atomic bomb was the most difficult decision of his life.
- Argues that atomic bombs should have been dropped on iwo jima to demonstrate its power before dropping them on innocent japanese civilians. they argue that president truman was just showing the united states’ nuclear power to the soviets, making the nuclear arms race that followed world war 2.
- Argues that using the atomic bomb to quickly end the war saved millions of japanese and american lives that would be wasted on the battlefield.
- Opines that the use of the atomic bomb was harsh and rash, but necessary to end the war and protect american lives and interests.
734 words
Read More
Primary Cause Of The Seminole War
analytical essay
... then turned to incidenary bombing at low altitudes with devastating results. In a few months 180 square miles of 67 different cities were destroyed; 2, 510,00 Japanese homes were destroyed leaving about 30% of the population homeless. With between 268,157 to 900,000 Japanese civilians killed there were more Japanese civilians killed by American weapons than were Japanese soldier and the majority of these deaths were direct results of firebombing. The United States then dropped two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki killing 200,000 people and within days the Japanese surrendered. While the morality of the bombing of Japan is highly questionable the effectiveness is not. The bombing led directly to the surrender of the Japanese and saved the lives of the many American troops that would have been lost had the United States engaged in the invasion of the mainland.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the seminole war was caused by the instability of florida following the war of 1812.
- Describes how the monroe administration sent general andrew jackson to the region and gave him "full power to conduct the war as he think best."
- Analyzes how the first seminole war left the americans empowered and the power of semines greatly declined. the monroe administration struggled with what to do with the captured territories.
- Explains that the seminole war was caused by the instability of florida following the war of 1812.
- Describes how the monroe administration sent general andrew jackson to the region and gave him "full power to conduct the war as he think best."
- Analyzes how the first seminole war left the americans empowered and the power of semines greatly declined. the monroe administration struggled with what to do with the captured territories.
- Analyzes how sherman's march to the sea exemplified this belief during the civil war. sherman believed that the confederacy drew its strength not from its troops but from the material and moral support of the southern population.
- Explains that the allied war effort in world war ii was a deadly way of targeting the enemy. the hague conventions were never updated to include any restrictions of aviation.
- Explains that american bombing in the pacific theatre was more destructive than in europe. the us marines were taking heavy casualties for the sake of the air force.
1332 words
Read More
Atomic Bomb Essay
analytical essay
America was greatly affected by the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. American reactions varied due to many factors. While many reactions to this end to the war were positive, some Americans questioned how this situation was handled and wondered if other things could have been done to end World War II.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the bombings of hiroshima and nagasaki showed that americans would lead the world into the nuclear age. americans were asked whether or not they approved or disapproved of the use of atomic bombs on japanese cities.
- Explains that americans felt terror after the bombings, since they wondered what could be done with nuclear weapons. they praised the creation of the atomic bomb as a positive thing for future conflicts.
- Analyzes how americans questioned whether dropping the bombs was the right thing to do after the nuclear bombings of hiroshima and nagasaki.
- Analyzes how the bombings of hiroshima and nagasaki showed that americans would lead the world into the nuclear age. americans were asked whether or not they approved or disapproved of the use of atomic bombs on japanese cities.
- Explains that americans felt terror after the bombings, since they wondered what could be done with nuclear weapons. they praised the creation of the atomic bomb as a positive thing for future conflicts.
- Analyzes how americans questioned whether dropping the bombs was the right thing to do after the nuclear bombings of hiroshima and nagasaki.
- Opines that the bomb drops ended the war quickly and brought back the many americans that went to fight.
- Explains that americans were faced with moral dilemmas after the dropping of the bombs in hiroshima and nagasaki.
- Opines that america must confess its sin and apologize to the world for its misuse of the atomic bomb.
- Explains how the government covered up the positive effects of the bombings, including the medical effects, and the radiation that killed so many japanese.
- Explains that america was affected by the bombings of hiroshima and nagasaki. american reactions varied due to many factors.
1488 words
Read More
The Nuclear Bomb: The Controversial Devision in World War II
explanatory essay
The United States had every right to drop the bomb on Japan. If there was an invasion instead of the bombing, over 500 thousand U.S. lives would have been lost, and over a million Japanese people would have been killed. The Japanese would have fought to the last inch of the island, and the casualties would've been astronomically higher if "Little Boy" and "Fat Man" weren't dropped on Japan.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that president truman's decision to use the nuclear bomb ended world war ii quickly and created mass destruction and devastated the two cities targeted.
- Explains that the united states was planning an invasion after capturing two major islands- iwo jima and okinawa. the first atomic bomb was tested in new mexico.
- Describes how the first atomic bomb ever used in combat was dropped from an american b-29 superfortess, known as the enola gay, at 8:15 local time.
- Explains that president truman's decision to use the nuclear bomb ended world war ii quickly and created mass destruction and devastated the two cities targeted.
- Explains that the united states was planning an invasion after capturing two major islands- iwo jima and okinawa. the first atomic bomb was tested in new mexico.
- Describes how the first atomic bomb ever used in combat was dropped from an american b-29 superfortess, known as the enola gay, at 8:15 local time.
- Opines that the united states had every right to drop the bomb on japan. if there was an invasion instead of bombing, over 500 thousand u.s. lives would be lost, and over a million japanese people would have been killed.
- Explains that president harry s. truman authorized the use of the atomic bomb because if japan surrendered to the soviet union, it would have changed japan into a communist country.
898 words
Read More
The Atomic Bombs
opinion essay
One representative of the anti-bomb school of thought is Gar Alperovitz, a college professor who has written two books on the topic. Though I concede that Alperovitz is right that the targeting of civilians in the dropping of the two atomic bombs was wrong, I agree more with Spencer Tucker, an advocate for the bombs who has a PhD from the Virginia Military Institute, and his statement that dropping the bombs was the best way to end the war quickly and avoid the loss of many more American lives. Ray Skates, who wrote The Invasion of Japan: Alternative to the Bomb, concluded that t...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that world war ii was the most destructive war in terms of destruction and lives lost in all history.
- Disagrees with gar alperovitz's claim that dropping the bombs was the best way to end the war quickly and avoid the loss of many more american lives.
- Opines that dropping the atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki in august 1945 has sparked one of the most controversial arguments of all time.
- Explains that world war ii was the most destructive war in terms of destruction and lives lost in all history.
- Disagrees with gar alperovitz's claim that dropping the bombs was the best way to end the war quickly and avoid the loss of many more american lives.
- Opines that dropping the atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki in august 1945 has sparked one of the most controversial arguments of all time.
- Explains that dropping the bomb was unjustified. world history: the modern era.
633 words
Read More
The Use and Necessity of the Atomic Bomb in World War II
explanatory essay
This investigation focuses on the use and necessity of the atomic bomb in World War II. To what extent did the atomic bomb dropped by the United States during World War II save lives? This will be investigated using websites, books, military accounts, and newspaper articles. Military calculations of what potentially could have happened had the United States invaded Japan instead of dropping the bomb will be researched. Also, information from the Manhattan Project, reinterpretations of the event, and military strategies of several countries will be used. The physical effects of the bomb on the victims will also be considered. Alternate opinions of why the bomb was dropped will be discussed.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the investigation focuses on the use and necessity of the atomic bomb in world war ii. military calculations of what could have happened had the united states invaded japan instead of dropping the bomb will be investigated.
- Analyzes how edward t. sullivan's the ultimate weapon chronicles how scientists, civilians, and military personnel worked together to build the first atomic bomb.
- Explains that davis' firsthand knowledge of war strategies and statistics is prominent in his writing. he describes the plans of operation downfall and tells of some of the differences that occurred between the potential casualties
- Explains that the investigation focuses on the use and necessity of the atomic bomb in world war ii. military calculations of what could have happened had the united states invaded japan instead of dropping the bomb will be investigated.
- Analyzes how edward t. sullivan's the ultimate weapon chronicles how scientists, civilians, and military personnel worked together to build the first atomic bomb.
- Explains that davis' firsthand knowledge of war strategies and statistics is prominent in his writing. he describes the plans of operation downfall and tells of some of the differences that occurred between the potential casualties
- Explains that the united states dropped the atomic bomb to intimidate stalin and accredit themselves in the ongoing competition of national superiority.
- Explains that the united states planned to bomb japan to save lives and end world war ii. the bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki saved millions of lives.
- Opines that germany or another country involved in world war ii would have dropped an atomic bomb, had the united states decided not to. both germany and russia were working on weapons of mass destruction.
- Explains that the atomic bomb saved millions of people by ending world war ii before more serious damage could be done. the japanese surrendered after hiroshima, and the united states dropped the bomb.
- States that blohm, craig e., "manhattan project." cobblestone may-june 2010: 36+. general reference center.
- States that dannen, gene, "atomic bomb: decision." http://www.dannen.com. n.p., 9 aug. 2003.
- Describes how the united states faced the burden of fighting two dangerous military powers: germany and japan.
1775 words
Read More
The Effects of the Atomic Bomb
analytical essay
Some regard the atomic bomb as “the thank God for the atom bomb”. This places God on the U.S. side and regards the bombs as our saving grace. This bomb forced the Japanese to surrender which in turn proved the U.S. to be the heroes who saved the American’s lives.1 The Americans intended on ending the war but did not expect to end it with such a large number of casualties. The results of the atomic bomb and how it effected the Japanese people both emotionally and physically will be addressed. “The bombs marked both an end and a beginning—the end of an appalling global conflagration in which more than 50 million people were killed and the beginning of the nuclear arms race and a new world in which security was forever a step away and enormous resources had to be diverted to military pursuits”.2
In this essay, the author
- Argues that the japanese suffer from historical amnesia and are trying to come to some sort of understanding as to why the americans allowed the bombing to occur.
- Explains that the most political topic that was debated in the 1950’s was whether radiation had any major or hazardous effects.
- Analyzes john w. dower's essay, "triumphal and tragic narratives of the war in asia."
- Argues that the japanese suffer from historical amnesia and are trying to come to some sort of understanding as to why the americans allowed the bombing to occur.
- Explains that the most political topic that was debated in the 1950’s was whether radiation had any major or hazardous effects.
- Analyzes john w. dower's essay, "triumphal and tragic narratives of the war in asia."
- Describes ernest hook's findings on the exclusion of minor malformations in the study of mutation.
- Analyzes toyofumi ogura's letters from the end of the world: a firsthand account of bombing.
- Analyzes john w. dower's essay, "triumphal and tragic narratives of the war in asia."
- Describes ernest hook's findings on the exclusion of minor malformations in the study of mutation.
- Analyzes toyofumi ogura's letters from the end of the world: a firsthand account.
- Explains that the atomic bomb forced the japanese to surrender and proved the u.s. to be the heroes who saved the american's lives.
- Opines that the death rates and emotional scars caused by the atomic bomb should be reason enough to never allow such a tragedy to occur again.
1597 words
Read More
Atomic Bomb 8
analytical essay
The bombs dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima caused massive amounts of damage and ruined thousands of lives, but they saves many more lives by ending the war quickly. Many questions pop into the heads of people that might have doubts whether or not the bombings were necessary. Such questions might include: Why, exactly, was the bomb dropped? Was the second bomb necessary? Was Japan about to surrender? Was there a way to end the war less savagely? Would our current leaders have made the same decision? Was any authority opposed to the idea? Should we have bombed military bases instead of cities? These and many other questions arise. Before these are analyzed, a brief background on the bombs and the tests are in order (O’Neal 47).
In this essay, the author
- Explains that president truman was unaware of the radiation side effects of atomic bombs, which were unheard of during the war.
- Analyzes how the atomic bombs ended the political deadlock, and the japanese emperor demanded peace.
- Opines that the atomic bomb was a forceful enough message to prod the normally withdrawn emperor into action for peace.
- Explains that president truman was unaware of the radiation side effects of atomic bombs, which were unheard of during the war.
- Analyzes how the atomic bombs ended the political deadlock, and the japanese emperor demanded peace.
- Opines that the atomic bomb was a forceful enough message to prod the normally withdrawn emperor into action for peace.
- Analyzes how the united states demanded that the emperor be removed from his god-like state of power. the american public backed the unconditional surrender of japan.
- Explains ferrell, robert h. harry s. truman and the bomb. worland, wyoming: high plains publishing company inc.
- Explains that president truman, who authorized the use of the atomic bomb, made a wise decision to end the war.
- Argues that a negotiated peace with japan would be tantamount to political suicide.
- Cites o&#8217;neal, michael, and purcell, john. the best kept secret: the story of the atomic bomb.
2491 words
Read More
The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb
analytical essay
is the only country to use nuclear weapons against an enemy. The bombing caused more than 200,000 people to be killed immediately, and even more died later due to radiation poisoning and other various injuries, and it also caused 80% of the buildings to be flattened instantly. For years a debate has raged over rather the bomb should or should not have been dropped during the final weeks of WW2. The primary sources in this collection of documents touch upon the standing of the decision to drop the Atomic Bomb. The documents are as follows: A memorandum of the Recommendations on the Immediate Use of Nuclear Weapons, June 16, 1945, a Petition to the President of the United States, July 17, 1945, President Harry S. Truman: Press Release on the Atomic Bomb, August 6, 1945, a photograph of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945, a U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey, 1946, and an Eyewitness Account of the Hiroshima Bombing, 1945 written by Father Johannes Siemes. Based on these six documents, it is evident that there should have been a better approach in handling Japan, and that the bombings were not necessary to follow through
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the manhattan project kept the united states atomic program a secret in the 1930s. the bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki revolutionized world history and changed international relations.
- Explains the scientific advisory panel of the manhattan project's memorandum, which outlines the main comments on the initial use of atomic weapons.
- Analyzes the advice given to president truman in seeking an alternative to dropping atomic bombs on japan.
- Analyzes how the manhattan project kept the united states atomic program a secret in the 1930s. the bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki revolutionized world history and changed international relations.
- Explains the scientific advisory panel of the manhattan project's memorandum, which outlines the main comments on the initial use of atomic weapons.
- Analyzes the advice given to president truman in seeking an alternative to dropping atomic bombs on japan.
- Analyzes president truman's statement to the public following the attack of the first atomic bomb nicknamed "little boy" that was dropped on japan.
- Analyzes how the fourth document shows the aftermath of the bomb dropping that rivetingly demonstrates the concerns that scientists penned the petition to president truman.
- Analyzes how president truman's fifth document called for surveys on the effectiveness of strategic bombing campaigns in europe and asia and the effects of the atomic bombs on two japanese cities.
- Analyzes how father johannes siemes's eyewitness account of the hiroshima bombing differed from president truman’s.
- Opines that the bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki was unnecessary. the u.s. should have taken more pride in the morals of their country.
1990 words
Read More
Essay On Hiroshima Bombing Justified
opinion essay
Thousands of lives should have not been the solution to ending the years long war. Many of those who lost their lives due to the atomic bomb are honored today and mourned for because there was and is no reason for lost lives. Many may say the bomb was justified because it saved American soldiers and ended the war, but lives of soldiers were already lost at Pearl Harbor and dropping of the bomb accumulated the death toll more than what it should've
In this essay, the author
- Opines that the bomb dropped on hiroshima and nagasaki was not necessary because it was made for defense.
- Explains that the bomb on hiroshima was not built to originally target japan. it was intended to be a deterrent, not an offensive one.
- Opines that the death toll for hiroshima and nagasaki together is about 225,000 deaths from two nuclear bombs.
- Opines that the bomb dropped on hiroshima and nagasaki was not necessary because it was made for defense.
- Explains that the bomb on hiroshima was not built to originally target japan. it was intended to be a deterrent, not an offensive one.
- Opines that the death toll for hiroshima and nagasaki together is about 225,000 deaths from two nuclear bombs.
- Analyzes how truman was unprepared for the role of presidency, and how he handled the case fairly well.
- Explains that the atomic bomb was so powerful that almost the entire city was destroyed. the genbaku dome was one of the few still standing structures that survived the blast.
- Concludes that the atomic bomb on japan was not justified because of how many lives were lost when a simple action of knowing that japan would have surrendered in due time to end the years long war.
1014 words
Read More
Should have the Atomic Bomb been dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
explanatory essay
In total the casualties and losses added to a number in between 150,000-300,000 killed, many stories recount the horror which happened as a result of the war. Opinions state that the Americans shouldn’t have dropped the bombs, saying that innocent people didn’t need to die and that their retaliation to Pearl Harbour was somewhat harsh. The Japanese were also willing to surrender on the condition that the Imperial family was retained, but they were denied this right and Japan decided to fight onwards. Following the dropping of the Hiroshima bombing, the Russians had invaded Japan and arguably this would have led to their Surrender, meanin...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the manhattan project was the first and current only use of nuclear weapons in wartime history. it was developed in fear of the germans having their own atomic bombs.
- Opines that the atomic bombs didn't end the war, stating that it was a myth that they did not cause as much damage as firebombing of the japanese cities.
- Explains that the postdam declaration and leaflets required the axis alliance to accept unconditional surrender and had reasonably fair terms.
- Explains that the manhattan project was the first and current only use of nuclear weapons in wartime history. it was developed in fear of the germans having their own atomic bombs.
- Opines that the atomic bombs didn't end the war, stating that it was a myth that they did not cause as much damage as firebombing of the japanese cities.
- Explains that the postdam declaration and leaflets required the axis alliance to accept unconditional surrender and had reasonably fair terms.
- Explains that japan killed over 2,000 people in the pearl harbour bombings without the us provoking them, and may have taught them to attack again and perhaps was justified as the japanese had placed soldiers in inhumane conditions.
- Opines that the atomic bombs should have been dropped as it ultimately convinced japan to surrender and had the potential to save millions of lives, through the killing of thousands.
668 words
Read More
Prompt and Utter Destruction
analytical essay
..., in a way that would undoubtedly change the image of the American military. The bomb on Hiroshima did just that, and left Japan with only the option to consider a surrender that would end the war. The first bomb was a horrific, necessary military operation. The bomb that destroyed Nagasaki just three days later, with a warning after the fact, was an animalistic attack. With the combination of the bomb on Hiroshima and the Russian invasion, the attack on Nagasaki was completely unnecessary. If the United States had never used the second bomb, the same conclusion would have been reached, but without the added destruction and brutal murder of innocent, noncombatant Japanese.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes the controversy surrounding truman's decision to drop atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki during world war ii.
- Explains that the united states was eager to end the war against japan, and to prevent more american causalities.
- Explains that the use of the first atomic bomb on hiroshima was a necessary, extreme measure.
- Analyzes the controversy surrounding truman's decision to drop atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki during world war ii.
- Explains that the united states was eager to end the war against japan, and to prevent more american causalities.
- Explains that the use of the first atomic bomb on hiroshima was a necessary, extreme measure.
- Explains that after hiroshima was completely destroyed by an atomic bomb, the american military began printing leaflets to warn the japanese people of a second bomb.
- Opines that the use of atomic weapons on the japanese cities of hiroshima and nagasaki was motivated by the need to end the war, and by a racist attitude toward japanese people.
- Explains walker, j. samuel, prompt and utter destruction truman and the use of atomic bombs against japan, revised edition.
1090 words
Read More