Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Karl marx theory on class
Merits and demerits of karl marx's theory of social class
Stalin social policies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Karl marx theory on class
Discussion on Whether Stalin Was a Necessary Evil
Marxism was a doctrine formulated by Karl Marx about the elimination
of economic inequality and class conflicts. According to Marxism
social and political relationships depend on economic factors because
whichever group in society controls the "means of production" also has
political control. Marx believed that historical change was a series
of stages that were influenced by economic forces and that each stage
had to be completed before the next could begin. In a classes and
stateless society, co-operation will replace competition and this
final and perfect stage of human history would be communism.
In Russia the government was essentially feudal, the majority of the
population were peasants, and capitalism was in its infancy. Lenin
realised that in order to bring about revolution Marxism would have to
be adopted to suit these conditions. Lenin developed the argument that
the economic resources that imperialism provided were used to "buy
off" workers in capitalist countries by improving working and living
conditions. This made workers less revolutionary, as the system did
not appear to be treating them badly. His view of the dictatorship of
the Proletariat was that the Party would form a dictatorship to fight
counter-revolutionary attempts, take away private property and end
free enterprise to build a secure socialist state.
The 1917 February Revolution saw the end of the Romanov dynasty as
Tsar Nicholas abdicated and his place soviets (Russian for councils)
were set up across the country to represent soldiers, workers and
peasants, which allowed the Provisional Government led by A...
... middle of paper ...
...onstraints. Stalin established system that
lacked a smooth transition of power after his death and dragged the
USSR into a Cold War with America who had the ability to out produce
and out spend because of its market based economy and privatisation of
debt.
Stalin's harsh polices are indefensible on a moral or human level. The
idea of the end justifying the means as his modus operandi was
erroneous and the staggering cost in human lives overrides any
progression achieved under a brutal rule.
---------------------------
1. (From Page 2)- A quote from one of Stalin's speeches
Bibliography
· Dimitri Volkogonov, 1991,Stalin: Triumph and Tragedy, Phoenix Press,
London.
· Vicki Greer and Robert Darlington, 2002, Flashpoints: National and
International Studies, Heinemann- Hardcourt Education, Melbourne.
Though it existed for over 70 years, many of the Soviet Union’s structures were put in place before and during Stalin’s reign. Milovan Djilas succinctly summarized the general Soviet system in his book, The New Class when he wrote “There is no fundamental difference in the Communist system between governmental services and party organizations, as in the example of the party and the secret police. The party and the police mingle very closely…the difference between them is only in the distribution of work” (Djilas, pg 73). The system Djilas described was one where the Bolshevik party was in absolute control of the government and all its functions. This included the bureaucracy, and secret police, as well as the military. As a result, the Bolshevik party was in total control of all the Soviet Union’s levers of power. It was effectively an autocracy of the Communist party, at the head of which rested Joseph Stalin, whose power was absolute and as close to god-like, as anyone had ever had. Nikita Khrushchev testified to Stalin’s autocratic power in his book, Khrushchev Remembers, when he wrote, “Stalin adapted all methods of indoctrination to his own purposes. He demanded unthinking obedience and unquestioning faith” (Khrushchev, pg 8). Khrushchev was undoubtedly politically biased against Stalin, but his statement seems to be in line with the latter’s record of achievements. The purges of
The evidence is overwhelming; from his abusive mother and father, to the influence of Karl Marx on his life, to his admiration of Machiavelli. I think that these are the reasons behind Joseph Stalin’s reign of terror because it has been proven that children who grow up in an abusive household tend to become later in life, and because Marxism was a very popular idea at that time. I also believe Marxist beliefs had an impact because, to an abused farm boy, Marxism could appeal to him. I still hold firm to my claim that the reason that when we think of Joseph Stalin's Reign of Terror, we think of one of the most disgusting and horrifying crimes in all of human history, is because of his brutal childhood in rural Georgia, and his complete belief in various Marxist
was able to hold on to leadership of the Soviet Union. He was able to
...se to power and implemented War Communism. Communism on its own is a salacious subject. It is the manner in which he won victory in comparison to Tsar Nicholas II who was repeatedly defeated and yet with both rulers the people of Russia still suffered, this is what drew my attention. However Lenin is humble enough to realise the problem and corrects it with the New Economic Policy, this shows good leadership indeed. I chose this topic to explore the thoughts that possibly went through Lenin’s mind, why there was a need to adjust from War Communism to the New Economic Policy and whether this change beneficial to Russia. I aim to show the conditions of Russia during both policies, and highlight what the people and the government wanted in comparison to what was needed. I shall also discuss why War Communism failed and why the New Economic Policy was more successful.
Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union, arguably the world’s most powerful, but lethal leader, was Russia’s turning point from agriculture and failed westernization to a world superpower and rapid industrialization. The power struggle and chaos in Russia from 1914 to the 1920’s made it easy for him to win power. In World War I, there was a sharp decrease in every aspect of Russia which led to many riots triggering a revolution in 1917. Nicholas II, the czar of Russia later abdicated and was killed. Alexander Kerensky took over Russia and as turmoil escalated, Vladimir Lenin replaced him by promising three simple things: peace, bread and land. Lenin led the path to communism but died in 1924 of typhus. In 1929, Stalin took absolute power of Russia, later becoming the U.S.S.R or the Soviet Union. Joseph Stalin had complete totalitarian control of Russia, making it a world superpower by industrializing fast. Joseph Stalin ultimately did more good in Russia/U.S.S.R than harm because of his economic technique of industrializing the country in a short time and his politically stable control of the U.S.S.R although he murdered many for the expansion of the country.
As the tsarist regime fell, Lenin and the Bolshevik Party entered Russia. They operated on a Marxist platform and operated quickly to “develop Russia in such a way as to spread social revolution throughout Europe and eventually the world.” Though their opponents were also Marxist the Bolsheviks were the most militant, least tolerant and most revolutionary. After toppling the remaining dictatorial powers during the October Revolution the Bolsheviks created multiple Soviets and disclosed all the secrets of the tsars, including the treatises that had been made with other countries. All of this was done in an effort to expose the corruption of the capitalist countries and the old regime. What the party did not count on, however, was how their actions would impact the rest of Europe and how other nations would respond.
People say that the Stalin’s Great Purges could otherwise be translated as Stalin’s Terror. They grew from his paranoia and his desire to be absolute autocrat, and were enforced the NKVD and public show trials. When someone went against him, he didn’t really take any time in doing something about it. He would “get rid of” the people that went against industrialization and the kulaks. Kulaks were farmers in the later Russian Empire. (“Of Russian Origin: Stalin’s Purges). There were many reasons as to what caused the Great Purges but the main one seems to be Stalin. He believed that the country had to be united under the circumstances that he becomes the leader if it was to be strong. The Soviet Union was industry was weal and in the decline, obviously lacking the capacity to produce enough meal and heavy machinery for the imminent war.
Joseph Stalin’s full name is Josef Vissarionovich Djugashvili He was born on December 18, 1878, in Gori, Georgia, which was a small part of the Russian empire. When he grew up he chose the name Stalin, which meant “man of steel” in Russian. Stalin was brought up in a poor family and was an only child. When he was little, Stalin caught smallpox, which game him facial scars that he had for life. He got a scholarship to join a university in the city of Tblisi. When he was there, he secretly was reading book called “Communist Manifesto”, written by the social philosopher, Karl Marx. He became interested in the radical movement against the Russian monarchy. Stalin was eventually kicked out of the school because of missing, however he claimed it was for Marxist propaganda.
During the 1900’s the Russian Government made it extremely hard for the Bolsheviks to progress which made them revolt against the government making this a prime matter for the start of the Revolution. The Czarist government was ostracized by the common people of Russia so Tsar Nicholas II was overthrown by the Provisional Government, whom later on were overthrown by Lenin and shortly after the Bolsheviks took control over Russia. Russia was hard to develop because of the major leaders who had control; Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky. Almost overnight an entire society was destroyed and replaced with one of the most radical social experiments ever seen. Poverty, crime, privileged and class-divisions were to be eliminated, a new era of socialism promised peace, prosperity and equality for all the peoples of the world. But the social experiment failed, millions were killed, and within a generation almost one-third of the world’s population was living in the shadows of communism.
Stalin's Atrocities While In Power When Vladimir Lenin died in 1924, he was succeeded by Joseph Stalin, one of the cruelest people ever to hold power. To Stalin, the rising national revival movement and continuing loss of Soviet influence in the their satellite states was completely unacceptable. To destroy his subject's free spirit, he began to implement the same methods he had successfully used in the Soviet Union. Those arrested were either shot on sight like animals or deported to prison camps in remote areas of Russia. Joseph Stalin was a brutal dictator responsible for countless atrocities, including multiple genocides.
The Russian revolution was made with the goal of creating an egalitarian government that was based off of Karl Marx’s socialism principles. In short, they used Karl Marx’s socialist principles as a basis for their communist government that developed after the revolution.
At the start of the 20th century, Russia began to rapidly change. The Czarist autocracy that was previously in place was overthrown and the most influential family, the Romanovs, were no more. The Russian Revolution was soon in full swing and people were needed to take charge. One of the leader who emerges as a result of this is Joseph Stalin. Starting out as a simple countryside peasant, he quickly rose to a position of power. Eventually reaching the position of dictator, he implemented new policies that would further industrialize Russia as well as further progressing his goal of having total control over the Russian people. These policies include his 5-year plans as well as the creation of a totalitarian state. Joseph Stalin is, by many, considered one of the most ruthless leaders in the history of the world.
George Orwell represented Joseph Stalin in his book, “Animal Farm” with a character named Napoleon. In his book he was telling the story of the Russian Revolution in a satirical way when he changed the story he made it to where all the important people or group of people were represented through one animal. Napoleon, a pig, was Joseph Stalin; Orwell represented him by relating all the events that occurred into a reverse reality where it was put into an easier form to show how the events happened. To show this relation even more Joseph Stalin’s history must be revealed, how he relates to Napoleon, and if George Orwell did a good job representing Stalin.
Marx, in his theory of historical materialism, advocates that political and historical events result from the conflict of social forces. His theory focuses on the class struggles and the human attempts to control and dominate the natural environment. Profits obtained by the capitalists are a result of the workers being exploited. This conflict will lead to a revolution in which the workers control the state. Thus, capitalism will be replaced by socialism. The result is freedom for all. In the Soviet Union, the lower class overthrew the ruling class and created a new mode of production. This new economic base then determined political, social and ideological changes in its society. The failure of the Soviet Union impacts the validity of Marxian historical materialism because it discredits materialistic
According to most historians, “history is told by the victors”, which would explain why most people equate communism with Vladimir Lenin. He was the backbone of Russia’s communist revolution, and the first leader of history’s largest communist government. It is not known, or discussed by most, that Lenin made many reforms to the original ideals possessed by many communists during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. He revised Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles’ theories to fit the so-called ‘backwardness’ of the Russian Empire. Lenin’s reforms were necessary to carry out a socialist revolution in Russia, and the contributions he made drastically changed the course of history. It can be assumed that, the Soviet Union would not have been as powerful if it was not for Lenin’s initial advocacy of violence and tight organization.