Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Economic development in Russia under Stalin and his repressive reign
Economic development in Russia under Stalin and his repressive reign
Stalin's economic policies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Stalin's Power in the Soviet Union The above were all important reasons why Stalin was able to hold on to power in the Soviet Union. In the 1930s Stalin consolidated his position as "Supreme Dictator" of the Soviet Unionand he maintained this position using many different methods, the main two were controlling the people by terror and having control of and manipulating their ideas. Also Stalin's economic policies were extremely successful, had he not had these successes he would not have been able to hold on to power. When Stalin emerged as leader in 1928 the USSR was a backward country and lacked in industry. Stalin however managed to transform the country into a modern, powerful, industrial nation and he did this in several ways. Stalin wanted to protect the country from foreign invasion and protect it from other dictators by creating a strong industry. He did this by three main methods: 5 year plans, collectivisation and the building of showpieces of Soviet achievement. The 5 year plans on the whole were very successful and even though sometimes the unrealistic targets were not met amazing achievements were made, for example in the first 5 year plan between 1928 and 1932 when coal and iron doubled in output. In 1927 35 millions of tons of coal were produced but by 1932 this figure had risen to 64 millions of tons, also under the plan electric power trebled with 1,500 new industrial plans built. To Stalin these plans were a symbol of what socialist planning could achieve and he set production targets which industries must meet and if these targets were not met then the price would be paid in lives, the so called "saboteurs" ... ... middle of paper ... ... many people who were around in that period had died and those who could still remember were too afraid to speak out. In conclusion all the above were equally important reasons why Stalin was able to hold on to leadership of the Soviet Union. He was able to manipulate people's thoughts and ideas through propaganda and the cult of personality which encouraged people to think of him as a messianic figure. With the added help of his secret police he was able to wipe out any of his opposition. The introduction of the purges and show trials justified his actions as he was seen to be protecting the state from attack and crisis, thus making it more secure for the people. However had he not been able to industrialise the Soviet Union in the dramatic way he did it is unlikely he would have had control for as long as he did.
boosted the USSR’s economy. Therefore Stalin had created a country which seemed corrupt at the time, but later on it improved by the hard work Stalin had forced upon them.
death in 1953. But how is it that Stalin emerged as the new leader of
He used his glasnost (openness to public debate) policy and perestroika. restructuring to help the Russian economy. Both leaders wanted a "margin of safety". Reagan took a tough stand. against Russia and its allies.
People say that the Stalin’s Great Purges could otherwise be translated as Stalin’s Terror. They grew from his paranoia and his desire to be absolute autocrat, and were enforced the NKVD and public show trials. When someone went against him, he didn’t really take any time in doing something about it. He would “get rid of” the people that went against industrialization and the kulaks. Kulaks were farmers in the later Russian Empire. (“Of Russian Origin: Stalin’s Purges). There were many reasons as to what caused the Great Purges but the main one seems to be Stalin. He believed that the country had to be united under the circumstances that he becomes the leader if it was to be strong. The Soviet Union was industry was weal and in the decline, obviously lacking the capacity to produce enough meal and heavy machinery for the imminent war.
Khrushchev rose steadily up the party ladder, always combining his talents as an administrator with his technical training. After assignments in the Ukraine, he became head of the Moscow regional party committee, and in 1934 he became a member of the Central Committee of the Soviet Communist party. In these positions he directed the construction of the Moscow subway. Although increasingly influential, Khrushchev was never an intimate associate of Joseph Stalin; he concentrated on technical rather than political accomplishment. After World War II he was brought back to Moscow, where he became ¡¥one of stalin¡¦s top advisers¡¦. When Stalin died in 1953, Khrushchev used his wit to thrust all his opponents for leadership, including Malenkov. He became both Party Secretary and controlled the government through his associate Marshal Bulganin, who he named Premier. He ruled from 1956 to 1964.
Ronald Reagan came to the Presidency without any major political qualifications, but his victory in the Cold War was no lucky outcome. Dinesh D'Souza’s new book, Ronald Reagan: How an Ordinary Man Became an Extraordinary Leader, just published by the Free Press, looks at how Reagan helped end the Cold War. Ten years ago Ronald Reagan stood at the Brandenburg Gate and said, “General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and East...
It could be argued that this increasing power for the single leader drawn from his party was due to the need for fast, decisive and unquestioned leadership of the type needed in battle. After all, Russia was portrayed by the Soviet propaganda machine as being at war with its own industrial backwardness as workers were urged to industrial fronts'. If the period of the 1930s is considered, it was a time of crisis. The building tension due to the rise of Nazi Germany making European foreign politics a risky place to navigate, the economic onslaught at home in Russia and the economic depression in the rest of the world making the times harsh. This change then could be argued as being beneficial to the USSR as only a single individual can provide the strong leadership needed, amongst a large group of individuals disputes would hinder the decision making process.
[ik1]again - this is too strong - by suggesting it was now time to end
played a part in caring out the assassination in order to stop the country from turning communist,
war he showed to be a great leader during it. He never gave up on anything he
his family cleared the way for Lenin to be in Control and take Russia out of the war.
· He did his best to get on with Stalin and treat the USSR fairly,
Reasons that Enabled Stalin to Hold onto Power in the U.S.S.R. There were many reasons which enabled Stalin to hold on to power in the USSR. One of the many ways which helped Stalin to control the USSR was the use of the NKVD (secret police). The Secret police was Stalin’s own police force which he used to execute opposition, secure oppositions of which he thought enemies and beat civilians which refused to follow his command. This helped Stalin to gain virtually all power over the people of the USSR due to normal civilians being scared to oppose Stalins laws and simply people decided to obey him. Another key factor which gave Stalin power was Stalin’s control over the Judges and the courts rulings.
Joseph Stalin's Leadership Through World War Two Stalin (1927-1953) led the Soviet State through the challenges of World War II. Although the war was a terrible drain on the already impoverished and exhausted society, it resulted, paradoxically in strengthening the Soviet dictatorship. The war distracted the Soviet people from Stalin's excesses in previous years and generated patriotism and national unity. It also greatly strengthened the Soviet military. The Soviet Union emerged from the war as second in power only to the United States.
Joseph Stalin's Rule Stalin was an evil dictator whose rule did nothing to improve Russia." Joseph Stalin was a dictator of Russia, his plan was to revolutionise. the country. During his reign he achieved his goal but at the cost of millions of lives. He imprisoned millions of his citizens, army and members of the Communist Party.