The Book Is Better One of the biggest debates for book and movie lovers is “the book was better than the movie” or “the movie was better than the book.” I’m a movie and book lover and I often find myself having this debate.It’s a debate that can go either way and it often ends in a disagreement between the fans discussing the book or movie. The book is better than the movie and there are plenty of films from the past ten years that exhibit this. The Harry Potter series is one of my favorite movie series. The films were well done and follow the books well. J.K Rowling has captured the hearts of many and there are “Potterheads” in every country. While the films were nothing short of amazing, the books give readers more insight into Harry Potter 's thoughts. The reader really sees the “Wizarding World” from Potter’s eyes. It’s very …show more content…
The Hunger Games films did not follow the books. In the first film of the series, “The Hunger Games”, there were many differences. Though most were minimal, a few really stuck out. The mockingjay pin is received differently in the book than in the movie. In the book, Katniss receives the pin from Madge Undersee, the daughter of the mayor of District 12. In the film, Katniss receives the pin from Greasy Sae. Receiving the pin from Greasy Sae, removed a character from the movie. Madge was never mentioned. Another difference that disappointed me was, the dogs that appeared in the ending of the Hunger Games. In the book, the dogs were described as having characteristics of the dead tributes. In the movie, it was just large vicious dogs chasing Katniss, Peeta and Cato. The book went more into detail about death and the vulgar attacks by the contestants. In the films, these scenes were limited to keep the films rated PG-13. Fans lose some interesting characters, the plot is different, and the the violence described in the book is not displayed in the
A common theme that’s developed in The Giver, by Lois Lowry, and The Hunger Games, by Suzanne Collins, is that people need their rights and freedoms. In both texts the citizens have no power nor rights. In The Giver, if people make honest mistakes they are released, a nicer term for being killed, not to mention they have no trail, and this is only one right the citizens don’t have. The receiver of memory is the only person in the community that sees what is wrong, because they have the memories of the past. One receiver, Rosemary, kills herself so the memories would go to the citizens, and influence them to rebel. Although she failed because she did not have enough memories to give the people, she influenced the next receiver, Jonas, to give
book was blander. The book did not catch my attention as much. The movie really caught my
In conclusion, after comparing both a Classic novel and a Modern Novel the Classic novel won the battle between old and new. I personally liked Lord of the Flies a lot more than the Hunger Games because of the way the themes were demonstrated and they way I was lead to view the main characters.
There are usually differences in two different versions of something. This can often be seen when a book is made into a movie. There are many similarities and differences in the book and movie versions of To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee.
Throughout time humans have struggled with the unknown, with the fear that once life is over nothing remains, that the only thing awaiting them is oblivion. To combat these fears we create various religions, belief systems, and faiths to reassure ourselves that we are not shouting into the void, that something will come out of our existence. Prime examples of these belief systems are Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism and Hinduism which emphasize a spiritual world. In dystopian novels, characters are often placed in situations without faith or religion such as The Giver by Lois Lowry, and The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins, the removal of faith forces characters to rely solely on themselves and helps depict the hopelessness in their world. The erasure of faith leads one to believe that it is a selling point of our society and should be kept intact, which is why Octavia Butler’s use of religion is odd in the genre. In Butler’s novel Parable of the Sower the narrator Lauren Oya Olamina creates a new religion called Earthseed and aims to offer her society hope for the future while they suffer the corruption and disintegration of the only world they know. Parable of the Sower states the function of religion, and specifically Earthseed, is to unite people in a single hope as the world goes to hell.
In both books they share some traits, even though they may not look anything alike they are. both of these novels are dystopian novels and many characters share similarity’s.
The Hunger Games was a good movie when it came out. This movie refers to a dystopia world in which there are 12 districts and a capitol who rules with an iron fist, in which the districts must provide a tribute to fight in an annual Hunger Game as a punishment for a past rebellion. Katniss Everdeen is a hunter from the 12th district, which Gale, her friend gives her tips on hunting. One day her sister, Primrose Everdeen, is chosen for the Hunger Games, and in order to save her, she volunteers instead to serve in the Games along with Peeta Mellark. During a TV interview, Peeta confesses her love for Katniss Everdeen, which causes the enragement of the latter; however, she later forgives him as he explains to her that it was only to gain sponsors. During the Hunger Games, she did not receive a lot of supplies except some medicine to cure a wound, but Districts 1 and 2 almost won the Game due to their training, and amount of supplies which Katniss destroys but cannot recover any of them. The Hunger Games was one of the best movies I ever watched because it has a little bit of everything and it captures the real-life survival game that we live on a daily basis.
Imagine being in a game where everyone dies except for one victor, and you have to risk your life to save your little sister’s life. Also imagine not being able to speak freely in your own home. These are some examples of how dystopian governments take control of the people in the societies in dystopian novels. The governments of 1984 and The Hunger Games share the dystopian goal of dehumanizing their citizens in order to maintain and win control over the citizens. The Party and the Capitol are after power, and whoever has control of the people in a society has has all the power.
Furthermore, the omnipotent powers of the two films are also proven to be similar. The authorities displayed in both movies completely control all things regarding their people. They make unethical and inhumane plans that endanger the citizens of their land. The Capitol of the film “The Hunger Games” uses its people to fight to death for entertainment and the Divergent government uses mind control to get their army to do whatever they are told. These government authorities, in both films, treat their people as puppets who are forced under their
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
In conclusion I think that book was amazing to read and I really enjoyed interpreting the different themes but the film added more depth and option for opinions for the story. For example hoe the director decided to present the characters and the ending of the book. The book can talk the talk but the film can walk the walk.
We have been reading the Hunger Games trilogy by Suzanne Collins. The books we have read are the Hunger Games and Catching Fire. The big theme in both of these stories are rebellion and how Katniss had rebelled to the Capitol. Katniss did little things in Hunger Games and did plenty of big things in Catching fire.
Both of the authors in 1984 and The Hunger Games present their ideas of dystopia to their readers similarly in many ways however there are some differences. As Tennessee Williams once said “caged birds accept each other but freedom is what they long for,” this quote represents both novels as the citizens of Panem and Oceania live under a terrifying dictatorship whereby they are constantly under surveillance without freedom, liberty or anything to enjoy within the society. 1984 and The Hunger Games are based in locations where the citizen are psychologically controlled as the governments are both oppressive and invasive through totalitarianism, societal inequality and with the help of technology.
...Hunger Games” book trilogy is still a story that will keep readers wanting more. From the first page in the first book to the last page in the third book, the characters, plot, and underlying morals will keep readers rooting for a new breed of hero and striving to be a stronger individual that could endure just as much and still make the most out of it.
I love the Hunger Games book; however, I was very dissapointed when I saw the movie. They left a lot of important details and information out and just the overall movie was a dissapointment. For example, during the games Katniss finds Peeta slowing bleeding to death and brings him to a cove to help him. This is shown in the movie but the most important part the left out is when Katniss starts to open up to Peeta. This is the part in the book where she truly starts to care for him. Comparing this book to the movie is like comparing a delicious dessert to some