Differences Between The 1960s And 70s

1883 Words4 Pages

A plethora of institutional and cultural shifts saw New Zealand in the 1960s and 70s start to become more permissive and liberal in its attitudes towards sex. From the advent of the contraceptive Pill and its eager reception early on, to the birth of New Zealand Homosexual Law Reform Society and subsequent political and social shifts surrounding homophobia, the two decades served as a pivotal time in sparking a change in language, discourse, narratives and ideology surrounding sexuality in New Zealand. Most pertinent were the changes within the state, medicine, and the law that caused multiple changes within society towards more liberal cultural attitudes, at an interactional level. In this essay I will argue that three things caused an attitudinal …show more content…

Evidence of the fact that the decades were only a beginning of more permissive attitudes can be seen in things like the New Zealand branch of the British Medical Association (NZBMA), which regarded birth control as something that did not have a place within public discussion, instead seeing it as something that should be relegated to between a husband and wife. This viewpoint reflected the qualms of older, conservative members of society, influenced by the church and traditional values. In 1966, the Health Department sent a notice to all Medical Officers of Health stating that it was ‘not considered that family planning should be included as a necessary of desirable part of new Zealand’s public health programme.’ This shows the reluctance of institutions for family planning to be a ‘medical’ issue, harking back to the days where NZFPA were chastised by the medical community for their family planning efforts. Though the Pill was eventually accepted in medicine, it should be noted that it was a slow process and prejudices against contraception and female bodily autonomy did exist. The Pill also received, interestingly, a lukewarm reception from NZFPA and female doctors. However, this was more due to a wariness about the side effects of long term use rather than from conservative sexual …show more content…

Chris Brickell notes that the beginnings of the movement and eradication of homophobia at an institutional, interactional and ideological level began with changing the social narratives. The law and medicine were pivotal in changing ideology and discourses surrounding homosexuality, and allowing for a more liberal society. The role of psychiatry and medicine in influencing cultural perceptions of non-normative sexualities is marked, and this was particularly seen in the birth of the Gay Liberation Movement in the ‘60s and ‘70s. Pritchard notes that, ‘The very discourse of medicine that had created a category of person – the homosexual – and consigned it to the realm of perversity and abnormality, where it could be probed and studied, became a tool for the assertion of gay rights.’ The cultural climate allowed for medicine and psychiatry to be used for the betterment of the cause, as sexology and Kinsey’s work were coming to the fore during the 1960s and 70s, and in western countries across the world, sexual liberation was being worked towards. The change in New Zealand consciousness from repressed, restrained views toward sex and sexuality to ones of expression and liberation came with changing the narrative and language used in everyday life surrounding sex. The global context of gay liberation is key in understanding the

More about Differences Between The 1960s And 70s

Open Document