Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Insights about creative writing
Strengths of the writing process
Insights about creative writing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Harry Potter: Something EPIC HERE
J.K. Rowling got the idea for Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone while on a train to London in 1990. She said, “...the idea for Harry Potter simply fell into my head.”(Rowling). Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone was published seven years later in 1997. The movie later came out in November, 2001. It is often said that a movie is never as good as the book. The differences between a movie and book could happen for a number of reasons. The movie, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone had some differences compared to the book Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone.
The first thing that stuck out to me was Harry’s appearance in the movie and book. According to the book Harry had, “...jet-black hair…”(15) and “...bright green eyes..”(20)
…show more content…
In the book, Harry was very smart-mouthed. For example, at one point Dudley asks him if he wants to practice putting his (meaning Harry’s) head down the toilet for his new school. Harry replies by saying, “No thanks...the poor toilet’s never had anything as horrible as your head down it --- it might be sick”(32). In another instance Harry’s uncle, Uncle Vernon, tells Harry to get the mail, in which Harry retorts, “Make Dudley get it.” (33). To the contrary, in the movie Harry never says anything that could be deemed saucy toward the Dursleys. He never questions what the Dursleys say and does not argue when he is told to do something. The movie can not always be exactly like the book for various reasons; producers do not find talented actors that resemble the character, directors may want to make their own interpretation of the book or the copyright laws simply restrict the director and producers to follow the book word for word. The movie Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone was very close to the book, but Harry’s character was not due to the physical appearance of the actor and the actor’s portrayal of the
While watching the movie, I could see that the main characters in the book, both their names and traits, were the same in both the movie and book. However, aside from that there were many different as...
This past March I visited Universal Studios in Orlando, Florida for the first time in years. As all things, it has changed drastically over time. Some rides remained the same, but others not so much. Universal Studios is a magical place to begin with, but add in two separate Wizard Worlds and you’ll be begging for more. As I have grown, I was never interest in Harry Potter; however, after only one day running through the Wizard World I was hooked. I couldn’t wait to get my hands on the books and movies. First, I dove into Harry Potter and The Sorcerer’s Stone by J.K. Rowling. Then, to complete the first pieces in the series, I watched Harry Potter and The Sorcerer’s Stone directed by Chris Columbus. Both pieces were exceptional and I enjoyed both; however, I believe the movie is slightly better.
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
There are few similarities between the book and the movie. Usually most movies are similar to
J.K. Rowling is a famous British novelist best known as the creator of the Harry Potter series. After being rejected many times Rowling finally was called by Editor Barry Cunninghan who gave her the opportunity of publishing Harry Potter’s book number one. In this paper I would be discussing the similarities and differences between the book and the film of Harry Potter’s book number three.
The film that was produced after the novel has a lot of differences and not as
Now for the counterargument. Some people say that they enjoyed watching the movie after reading the book. They may say that they think the movie does follow the book, and that the characters and events are the same in both versions. However, they are wrong because there is plenty of evidence that says otherwise. The different scenes of the book and movie, and also the characters that are completely different and don’t follow the same path in the two different
Many fans thought that it was unnecessary to take out and that the scene was important to the story. Some scenes in the movie however, were added in. One example of this is the scene where president Snow and one of the Gamemakers are talking in the garden. The book was from Katniss’ point of view so the reader only got her perspective, but in the movie they changed it and the viewer got to see things from other perspectives. This scene was an important change because it showed president Snow as the ultimate villain and set up his character. Scenes are changed from the novel to the movie, sometimes it turns out better and sometimes it turns out worse. Another iconic novel that become a movie was Chuck Palahniuk’s novel Fight Club. The novel was released in August of 1996 and the movie was released on October 15, 1999. Both the novel and movie follow an insomniac who meets an entrepreneur and together they start a fighting empire. There are many scenes from the novel that were changed in the movie. One of the best scenes that was changed is the scene where Tyler is
The characters make a big difference in the movie and the book. One thing they both have in common is that Otis Amber and Berthe Erica Crow get married. And that Edgar Jennings Plum and Angela Wexler get engaged instead of Doctor Denton Deere. Also Jake Wexler is a gambler instead of being a bookie.
The book Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone differs from the movie Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone in many ways. Most of these differences include characters and scenes. The two ways to discover this Harry Potter adventure are to either read the book or watch the movie. In fact, a person would want to read the book if they wanted the entire perception of the story and all of the information inside; whereas, a person would want to watch the movie if they wanted a rough sketch of the story. The two have dissimilarities but the person choosing to read the book or watch the movie is in charge of what they want to have. That is, the entire story or just a rough sketch of the story.
The plot in the film is very similar to the book but in parts, especially towards the end, the plot is slightly different to the film. The plot is varied in the film to show
The book that I read and the movie that I watched is Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. The book was written by the British author, J.K Rowling, and the movie was directed by the English director and producer, Mike Newell. The main characters are Harry Potter (portrayed by Daniel Radcliffe), Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint), and Hermione Granger (Emma Watson). The book was first released in the United States of America and the United Kingdom on July 8, 2000 . The movie had its premiere in London on November 6, 2005. It is classified as a mystery/fantasy genre for both the movie and the book. The story starts with Harry returning to Hogwarts for his fourth year, where the Triwizard tournament between the three well-known schools of magic, Hogwarts, Beauxbatons, and Durmstrang, is about to begin, wherein 1 champion aged 17 and above,
One major difference in the movie that was not in the book was the starting scene of the movie was set in the moor with Sir Charles being attacked by the Hound. In the book the starting scene was when Watson and Holmes had just found a walking stick that had the initials C.C.H. on it. I think that the movie starting scene was more informative because it let you know about what was happening and it also gave some more suspense to the film.
Harry Potter starts off slow, but gets very interesting near the end. In the beginning, you meet the Dursleys, Harry’s aunt, uncle, and their son Dudley. Then you learn that Harry’s parents were witches, and that they were destroyed by a evil wizard. A good witch, Albus Dumbeldoor, sends Harry to the Dursleys, because they’re his only remaining family. The Dursleys however, hated Harry and his family, so Harry was mistreated for years. He was forced to live in a cuborrod under the stairs. He had to watch as the fat, stuck up Dudley got whatever he wanted, and then usually broke whatever it was he got. Then one day Harry got a letter.
Have you ever read an amazing book only to be stuck with an awful movie based off of it? Watching a movie based off of a book is amazing, that is, if you haven't read the book. Reading the book that the movie is based off of is much better than the movie itself, imagining the words into action from a book gives one much more of a thrill than in the movie. The movie itself, is quite a disappointment.