Differences Between France And France After The Vietnam War

639 Words2 Pages

While, I think Miss. Cooksey’s poses a fantastic idea of the French forming an agreement for trading with Vietnam to appease a situation that benefits both countries; I would like to challenge the notion of whether this would have been a plausible alternative. Would the French have opted for just a trade agreement with Vietnam? As stated earlier, France’s presumption that they could easily beat the nation of Vietnam would stand in the way of their acceptance of a trade treaty with Vietnam. Even, if some agreement were worked out between the two countries, due to France’s pride in thinking that they were the superior nation, I believe would lead to the country’s reentry into Vietnam (Herring, 10). The notion that an independent Vietnam could bring the various …show more content…

I believe that when evaluating this is an equally important issue that plays a significant role in the nation’s ability to become independent. As South Vietnam relied on farming as their main economic source and North Vietnam’s was based on industry, the joining of the country economies could be a major issue when bringing the country’s various cultures together (Herring, 10). With the bringing of these two economies together, unified Vietnam would rely on both economies that were present in both North and South Vietnam. As the southern portion of the country produced food for the nation’s population, the north’s economy being industrial, would focus on the creation of commodities to export to other countries. The mutual reliance of the two economies would be another factor that could have brought Vietnam together, thus forming a successful independent country. The issue of religion may have been a tougher way for the cultures in Vietnam to cast aside their differences and come together to form a

Open Document