Differences Between Assyrians And Hittites

1415 Words3 Pages

1) The historians refer to the Late Bronze Age in the Middle East as a "cosmopolitan era" because they shared their cultures, lifestyle, and other ideas with other countries. Through the relations of states as well, there was the exchange of cultural ideas among one another. 2) The Assyrians and Hittites changed the political landscape of Western Asia by their superior military organization and their technology. They created new technology and weapons for the military, like launched stone projectiles, armored spearmen, cavalry equipment, and chariots. With these new technologies, military organizations became very strong, and had a better chance of beating their enemy. 3) The Hittite expansion impacted the culture of Hittites by exploiting the rich deposits of copper, iron, and silver from Anatolia, so that …show more content…

Diasporas were helpful to the Assyrian community and were used by the Assyrians for their own benefit. 18) The efforts the Assyrians put forth in governing their empire were campaigns, dedication, organization, and technology. These efforts impacted the Assyrians in making their society a more stable place in live. 19) The Assyrian social classes compare to the classes that existed under Hammurbi's Babylon because the vast majority of the people according to the Assyrian social class worked on the land, and individual artisans and small workshops in the towns manufactured pottery, tools, and clothing. While under Hammurabi's Babylon, there were free, landowning slaves, farmers and citizens, and slaves. Both the Assyrian social classes and Hammurabi's Babylon had similar social classes in their society. 20) According to the Assyrians, a "human being" was someone who was qualified enough for the same legal protection, and was liable for the same labor and military service. This concept of what a "human being" was, changed how people viewed

Open Document