Descartes Scientific Method

586 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Critiques of descartes real distinction between mind and body

With his method of radical skepticism, Descartes escaped a chain of assumptions built on dogmatic “results” and laid a new foundation for science rooted in observation and experiment. Dissatisfied with the qualitative evidence of Aristotelian syllogisms, Descartes sought to avoid building on assumptions by promoting criticism and rigorous review of hypothesis, which could them be pieced together mathematically to develop scientific theory. While Descartes left a framework that continues to drive modern science, some of his most fervent beliefs presented in Discourse on the Method have been abandoned to make way for a pragmatic view of sciences role in explanation. Aside from his contributions to mathematics, physics, and optics, one of Descartes’ largest contributions to scientific thought was his formulation of a physical universe whose machinations could be found out through inquiry of fundamental laws. While he proposed such a world hypothetically, he demonstrates how the current universe might be explained if it had “develop[ed] gradually out of chaos” in accordance to some set of laws. While his mechanistic arguments for how the universe or human body might possibly work are rough, these claims call for the end of using immaterial entities or forces …show more content…

His ideas shape our thinking so strongly that many of his teachings, while radical at the time, can seem obvious from the perspective of the modern reader. Descartes proposed the possibility of a mind-independent universe that obeys fundamental laws, and encouraged the rigor and mechanistic explanations that science seeks today. While Descartes justified his work with an a priori backing, science continues to operate without foundationalist assumptions about being. This could be interpreted as relinquishing mind-independent truth, as all theory are only descriptions of a world we can only hope to

Show More
Related

  • descartes

    1227 Words  | 3 Pages

    Descartes ignored all he believed to be true. He believed that if any belief can be doubted it is not certain, making it unusable as a foundation. Descartes jettisons any information, knowledge, or truths that are based on his senses. He applied the “Dream Argument,” (19) where he stated that based on the senses alone, there is no definite way of proving that you are dreaming or awake. Therefore, any truths based upon the senses are unreliable and doubtful. Descartes turned to why and how his senses were deceivable.

    Read More

  • Rene Descartes Discourse On Method Analysis

    645 Words  | 2 Pages

    Unfortunately, these ideas are very counter-cultural and some people just don’t want these ideas proclaimed. Some people are just confused between what society is selling and the true philosopher. Some people just try to make up a philosophy on their own and this is what happened with the writing of Rene Descartes in his work entitled, Discourse on Method. Descartes create a method that discredits God, truth and community because, he believes, all reasoning and truth is found in the individual. The biggest issue with Descartes method is the very first step, which is “to accept nothing as true which I did not clearly recognize to be so.” (Discourse, 14). This would lead anyone into the error, that if they encountered anything outside their experiences, these encounters would be deemed not true. As well as the

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Descartes Discourse On Method

    1251 Words  | 3 Pages

    Descartes asserts knowledge is done through experimentation using a scientifc method to removing opinions, and come up with a solution to conflicts. In the Discourse on Method, Descartes describes his unique style of reasoning, and makes clear that his main goal for writing is to solve epistemology, or the theory of knowledge. Similar to Socrates, Descartes sensory perceptions cause a false belief in the world around us, he believes one needs to be thinking on the intelligible level, however Descartes provides a different method to achieving this goal.

    Read More

  • The Theory Of Dualism In Descartes's Theory Of Dualism

    1506 Words  | 4 Pages

    RENÉ DESCARTES by career being a Mathematician carried his interest of entering into the philosophy realm. At a very young stage, he decided that nature is to be explained with certainty as Mathematics. Mathematics in itself is very numerical, where the nature cannot be expressed numerically but is bound in a neat and clear cut way. Thus, his philosophy about everything in nature is very mechanical and machine-like.

    Read More

  • Descartes' Pursuit of Certainty: The Thinking Existence

    807 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the second meditation of Descartes, he continues his topic about doubt and certainty. And he doubts that nothing is certain and wanted to use the Archimedes’s methods – “Demand just one firm and immovable point in order to shift the entire earth.” (Descartes, p394) - to make something certain. And the starting point is to find at least one thing that he can assure is “certain and unshakeable” (Descartes, p354).

    Read More

  • The Folly of René Descartes’ Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy

    1464 Words  | 3 Pages

    In order to embark on his quest for truth, Descartes first devises his four rules which should serve as a solid foundation for all else that he comes to understand. Those rules are here evaluated in terms of what they fail to take into consideration. The rules are examined individually and consecutively, and are therefore also reiterated in order to be clear about them. Furthermore, the approach of using these rules is also analyzed to some degree. Ultimately, however, it is my conjecture that Descartes’ four rules are not as solid a foundation as he claims, but fail to consider key issues which are noted herein.

    Read More

  • The development of the imagination, as examined by Descartes

    1355 Words  | 3 Pages

    Descartes explored the different relationships that exist between the senses, the imagination, and the understanding and while he cleared them, one thing still needs to be brought to light. It is only through calling into question and doubting our judgments ( brought to us by sense perception) that we avoid error, “ but since everyday pressures don’t always allow us to pause and check so carefully, it must be admitted that human life is vulnerable to error about particular things, and we must acknowledge that weakness of our nature” ( 35).

    Read More

  • The Philosophical and Scientific Methods of René Descartes

    5184 Words  | 11 Pages

    René Descartes (1596 – 1650) is one of the most widely known philosophers in history and he is frequently discussed as an inventor of the modern scientific method. Rene Descartes was born on March 31, 1596, in La Haye of Touraine. He came from a wealthy family, and thus did not have any real financial worries. At age ten, his father sent him to the College Henri IV at La Fleche. This was a newly established Jesuit school, which was considered one of the best in Europe in terms of academic quality. Although Descartes appreciated what he was taught in mathematics, he was nonetheless discontent with the scholastic teaching he received from that school (Cress, 1993).

    Read More

  • The Argument of Dualism

    1030 Words  | 3 Pages

    . Its most famous defender is Descartes, who argues that as a subject of conscious thought and experience, he cannot consist simply of spatially extended matter. His essential nature must be non-m...

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Cartesian Skepticism Created By René Descartes

    892 Words  | 2 Pages

    While on his journey to reveal the absolute truths and debunk anything that could be considered doubtful, Descartes’ experiences using this form of skepticism has allowed him to

    Read More

  • Thought Experiment By Rene Descartes

    1146 Words  | 3 Pages

    René Descartes was a French philosopher who refused to believe that true knowledge was obtainable through the means of sense perception. Descartes believed that the senses; as we know them, could be manipulated and twisted into providing false understanding of the external world. In the search for the truth amongst what we perceive in life, Descartes is justified in his claims that our senses cannot be trusted. Only by questioning all that is known as human beings, can one find the absolute truth in life. Through the use of two different thought experiments, Descartes uses reasoning to questions what we perceive as reality and truth.

    Read More

  • Newton Vs Descartes Research Paper

    711 Words  | 2 Pages

    Descartes and Newton differ in their conception of theology and cosmology. Newton’s world is ruled by mechanics and Descartes’ is based on cartesian mechanics. For Newton, nature is a machine that works together in a larger scheme. Newton’s natural philosophy begins with his study of phenomena, followed by the study of motion then moves into the forces of nature. His philosophy rests on simple, general rules. He then applies those rules back to motion and nature to further analyze his studies. His method aims to understand how forces and motion work with one another. Descartes notion of theology begins with radical doubt, a belief that God would not deceive him and finally, that the entire cosmos is a plan created by God, himself. In this essay I will compare Newton’s notion of theology to

    Read More

  • Decoding Human Rationality: A Study of Descartes' Perspective

    2154 Words  | 5 Pages

    Rene Descartes’ “Discourse on the Method” focuses on distinguishing the human rationale, apart from animals and robots. Wherein, he does so by explaining how neither animals, nor machines possess the same mental faculties as humans. For Descartes distinguishes the human rationale apart from non-humans, even though he does agree the two closely resemble each other because of their sense organs, and physical functions (Descartes, pp22). Nevertheless, it is because the mechanical lacks a necessary aspect of the mind, which consequently separates them from humans. For in Descartes “Discourse on the Method,” he argues that the noteworthy difference between humans, and the mechanical is that machines are only respond to the world because of their

    Read More

  • Rene Descartes Proof For The Existence Of God

    412 Words  | 1 Pages

    The foundation of science is proof. In order to prove the existence of God, Rene Descartes must lay a foundation of indestructible evidence. To achieve his goal, he must first destroy the fundamental beliefs of God’s existence. He also has to destroy the belief that all objects in this materialistic world are non-existence. This perception had to be within a rational framework. Once he has achieved this, he has to justify beyond any skepticism that God exists.

    Read More

  • Rene Descartes and the Source of Knowledge

    2129 Words  | 5 Pages

    Descartes is clearing away all knowledge that can be called into doubt. By doing this he hopes to create something real and lasting in the sciences, a foundation to build on. This indisputable fact will become the starting point or origin of all other true knowledge he can build upon it. He starts the first argument by attacking the very beginning of knowledge, human senses. Descartes states, "Surely whatever I had admitte...

    Read More

More about Descartes Scientific Method

Open Document