Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Automobiles and pollution
Impact of transportation on the environment
Environmental pollution in the global automobile industry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Automobiles and pollution
What do other countries think about America's wastefulness? Derrick Jackson answers this question in his article “Gas-Guzzling Americans Irk Europeans.” Written during a trek across Europe, this article offers a unique first-hand perspective on the animosity Europeans have towards Americans and their disregard for the health of the environment, particularly when it comes to vehicular pollution. By using spiteful quotes and adverse statistics and bringing up controversial political situations Jackson paints an ugly picture of America and the economical moral of her citizens. His biggest complaint is in the vehicles we drive. He claims, in short, that Americans simply have too much car. Europeans believe America’s cars are big, noisy, and most disturbingly, release millions of gallons of pollution into the atmosphere every year. If there were credible justification for such atrocities, Americans would at least have some grounds on which to defend …show more content…
According to George Bernard Shaw, “Progress is impossible without change, and those who cannot change their minds cannot change anything” (Shaw, p. 330). In order to truly make a change, one must change the minds of the people. America’s automobile industry has done a stellar job at this. In recent years fuel economy has surpassed make, body style, and “beeps and whistles” to become the number one factor people considered when purchasing a new car or truck (Choi). This shows that not only are vehicle manufacturers working to reduce vehicular pollution by improving how our cars are built, but even those that aren't directly involved with the manufacturing process are aiding the cause by choosing to purchase vehicles they know will produce fewer pollutants and consume less gas per miles driven. This discredits Jackson’s claims that Americans don’t care about the
Jacksonian (Democracy, Society, etc.) is a term used to describe reform during the time of Andrew Jackson’s Presidency. Specifically Jacksonian Democracy refers to “the general extension of democracy that characterized U.S. politics from 1824 to 1828.” Jacksonian Democracy and its support came primarily from the lower classes as a rebellion of sorts apposing the aristocracy. Even though it stressed equality, it was pro-slavery and anti-Indian (not unlike Andrew Jackson). Also there was change in both the political parties and the social reforms. Jackson was seen as a westerner (even though he was from Tennessee) and a president of the common man. This we can see when he married women out of the lower classes and the upper class was astonished. Also, Jackson had opened the white house to everyone on his inauguration day.
Topic: Jacksonian Democrats viewed themselves as the guardians of the United States Constitution, political democracy, individual liberty, and equality of economic opportunity.
Three specific ways in which American expansion shaped the Jacksonian period was through the advancement of technology, by way of slavery, and the Indian Removal Act. Jackson used any political and economic means necessary in order to see American frontier regions expand across the nation. Jackson’s Indian Removal policy had some of the most important consequences and paved the way toward American expansion. In the beginning of the Jacksonian era, colonial Americans’ settlements had not yet extended far beyond the Atlantic seaboard, partly because bad roads and primitive technology limited their ability to expand, and because both hostile Indians and British imperial policy discouraged migration beyond Appalachian Mountains. However, all of this changed after Jackson was in office and American expansion was well underway.
Jacksonians proved to be both guardians and violators of the Constitution, political democracy, individual liberty, and economic opportunity.
My wife drives a Nissan Altima that gets 32 miles a gallon and I motor around in a Maxima that faithfully achieves 28. My spouse and I habitually recycle our paper, glass and metal county trash and keep it all separate from our town-collected “other garbage.” We conscientiously maintain our property in a neat manner and keep our shrubs and bushes trimmed and our lawn well manicured. Like the plurality of Americans, we respect the environment and try our best to protect it.
As one of the most controversial figures in American history, Andrew Jackson, in the modern era, is regarded as a detestably violent and morally devoid individual. There is a certain moral complexity when one examines the accomplishments and political decisions accompanying Andrew Jackson's legacy. While Jackson is certainly deserving of credit in certain, primarily political, respects, the disastrous, violent outcomes underlying his starkly held personal beliefs supplant the aforementioned positive aspects Jackson's legacy includes. When examined in this manner, time has crafted an entirely disparate and stained narrative for Andrew Jackson. Taking this information into account poses a question to modern Americans: Should Andrew Jackson
The Age of Jackson, from the 1820's to the 1830's, was a period of American history full of contradictions, especially in regard to democracy. The period saw an increase in voter participation, nominating committees replaced caucuses, and electors began to be popularly elected. Yet, all of these voting changes affected only a minority of the American people: White, Anglo-Saxon males. So, though one can easily tell that White, Anglo-Saxon males were gaining
Automobiles play a major role in today's society. Almost every American owns at least one motorized transportation vehicle. Some say they make our lives better by reaching places faster than before. Others say they are a harmful to the environment. Have they made our society better or worse? They may be fast, but do we as humans want our environment to suffer because of time. Face it, cars pollute. And they release destructive chemicals into the air. Air pollution can threaten the health of many subjects in the environment including human beings.
These tax incentives and certification schemes are an ingenious way of benefiting the consumer and improving sales for the producer, all the while helping to curtail environmental degradation. Japan’s 2015 Fuel Economy Standards provide further evidence of the success of collaboration between government and industry. Implemented with the goal of improving passenger vehicle efficiency by 24%, from 32 miles per gallon (mpg) to 39.5 mpg, the target has already been met with Toyota’s development of the iQ and Prius.8,9,10 Compare this with the U.S.’s current standard of 27.5 mpg, set in 1985, for the same types of passenger vehicles. The U.S.’ 2015 Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFÉ Standards improve upon this current standard and are set at 35.7 mpg. However, as one can see, this is well below what is already being accomplished in Japan. (APSIA-Yearbook2009/Part2)
Millions and millions of people in the U.S. use cars every day for errands, whether it’s for 5 minute or 5 hours they still use a car to get the job done. But they don’t realize that every time they start the car their hurting the environment. There are many simple ways to eradicate or at least decrease the amount of air pollution we give off. For instance, we can take a couple of days off from cars every month. Everyone would either bike, walk, or take public transit if they had an errand to run. Yes, it would be a big adjustment for everyone in the United States, but if we look at other countries who have tried this approach it has worked out quite well. We can take Bogota,Colombia for an example. The mayor has banned the use of cars and only permitted the use of buses and taxis, and this is their third year going car free with a capital city of 7 million. Those who fail to comply to the no car policy pay a $25 fine. “ Millions of Colombians hiked,biked,skated or took buses to work during a car-free day yesterday, leaving the streets of this capital city eerily devoid of traffic jams. “ according to Andrew Selsky. This quote suggest the the car-free day was a major success,
Automobiles play an essential role in American society. As if being the major means of transportation was not impressive enough, automotives can be seen on T.V., in movies, in magazines, and can sometimes be indicative of a person’s wealth and social status. On average, Americans drive nearly 40 miles and drive for just over 50 minutes driving per person per day (http://www.bts.gov). That means a person spends roughly one-sixteenth of a day driving. It would make sense, then, to make such an essential part of society as efficient, cost effective, and clean as possible. However, that is not the case. As the years have passed cars have actually begun to move away from efficiency. Hawken writes, “[The automobile] design process has made cars ever heavier, more complex, and usually costlier. These are all unmistakable signs that automaking has beco...
The substantial increase in the demand for EV’s came just in time as we are slowly but surely running out of oil. Some estimate that by the year 2040, 35 percent of all vehicles will be electric (Sullins, 2017). An article from the U.S. Department of Energy stated that “Electric vehicles hold a lot of potential for helping the U.S. create a more sustainable future. If the U.S. transitioned all the light-duty vehicles to hybrids or plug-in electric vehicles, we could reduce our dependence on foreign oil by 30-60 percent, while lowering the carbon pollution from the transportation sector by as much as 20 percent (energy.gov, 2014). It’s obvious that gas-powered vehicles have harmed our planet with their emissions. Although EV’s cannot reverse that damage that has been done, they can eliminate, or at least slow down, the inevitable demise that our planet is headed towards. Along with the beneficial environmental factors that correspond with electric cars, there are also beneficial financial factors. The average American spends about $2,000 on gas annually. In the future, charging stations will charge roughly $12.00 for a full charge, which is about 300 miles. This means that the average American will save about $1,400 per year on these specific car
Today, people use their own personal vehicles to travel more than ever before. Personal transportation is no longer considered a luxury; it is now considered a necessity. The number of cars in the United States has been growing steadily since the 1970s. The number of miles traveled by cars has risen nearly 150 percent, yet the United States population has only grown roughly 40 percent during that time (hybridcars.com, Driving Trends). Although it may seem like we are advancing into the future, in reality, we are moving backwards from the effects these vehicles have on our bodies and the environment. The pollution produced by these vehicles has brought us to the day where we must find other modes of transportation that cause less harm to the world in which we live. Advances in technology have developed hybrid vehicles to try and slow down the amount of pollution. Driving a hybrid vehicle, instead of a conventional gas powered vehicle, can reduce the amount of pollution that affects our lives and the environment around us.
The U.S in particular has aimed at cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 18% over the next ten years. Climate change research and technology will also increase especially as the president’s 2003 budget reported a $700 million increase in funding for climate change-related programs (1). In addition, the President has issued reforms to “ensure that businesses that register voluntary reductions are not penalized under a future climate policy, and give credit to companies that can show real emissions reductions” (2). The U.S. has also initiated improvements in the transportation industry. There are exisiting tax incentives in place for buyers of cleaner emissions cars, like the Honda Insight, Honda Civic Hybrid (gas and electric), the Toyota Prius, or other clean-fuel vehicles (3). Clean-fuel vehicles are defined as motor vehicles designed to be propelled by one of the following fuels:
In “Living Without a Car: My New American Responsibility”, Andrew Lam explains his choice to give up his car in order to save the environment and he thinks that Americans should do the same too. It is not easy to be no longer a driver, it takes more time and effort. Also, owning a car is essential for American culture because it makes the immigrants feel Americans, determines how people arrange their everyday life and most people believe that a car in much more important than a house; you can live without a house, but it hard to live without a car. A car is a symbol of individualism and freedom. In addition, Politicians such as former VP Al Gore are calling for people to help to save the environment. Unfortunately, the American way of life in a climate change and short energy resource time is unsuitable and can conflict with the planet and create unprecedented crisis; this is way the author is living without a car and he feels like it is his American responsibility. I agree with Lam’s suggestion that we give up the car to save the environment for the following reasons.