Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical and bioethical issues related to death
Death definition essay
Matters of death
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical and bioethical issues related to death
The determination of death has become extremely complicated and confusing; even some medical experts find it hard to put it in words. A history professor at the University of Michigan, Martin S. Pernick explains this scenario in his work to show the inconsistency in the medical standard for clinical determination of death. In one of his lectures, Henry K. Beecher, Chair of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain-Death, said in his 1970 lecture, “There is a need to move death to the side of the individual’s consciousness, and if loss of consciousness is permanent, then to declare death.” A priest asked in the discussion following this lecture whether he meant to add cases of coma with “spontaneous respiration…but no consciousness.” Unable to prove his point, Beecher replied, “Oh, then he doesn’t fit our criteria at all. We said no movement, no breathing.” However, early in a 1967 lecture he said, “Our basic concern is with the presence or absence of physiologic life.” Beecher moved back and forth between agreeing and rejecting the idea of consciousness as the true determination of death.
The definition of brain death has another aspect of organismic “wholeness” that has been compelling. The President’s Council claimed that the brain is the essential part of the body without which the body is unable to perform necessary functions and literally “disintegrate” the somatic system (49). Philosophically, there could be two types of death-- the death of a person (capacity for thought, reason, and feelings) and the death of the body or the organism (50). Philosopher John Lizza believes that the human being with the loss of all brain functions or even those required for consciousness is a “diffe...
... middle of paper ...
... gases between organism and environment and not the inner drive to breathe per se” is necessary for self-preserving commerce as understood by the President Council when it states, “If the death of the organism is to be prevented, some external ‘driver’ of the breathing process—a mechanical ventilator—must be used” (qtd. in Shewmon 21), then it is similar to a comatose or a totally paralyzed patient’s “self-preserving sensorimotor interaction with the environment” (21). In addition, he mentions that the inner drive to breathe is also absent in conscious patients with lower brainstem functions and during sleep for those with Ondine’s curse (“in whom the lack of drive is arguably also ‘irreversible,’ insofar as the person will die during sleep at least without ventilator assistance”), therefore inner drive is also “not a necessary feature of organismic wholeness” (22).
Swinburne, Richard. "The Soul Needs a Brain to Continue Function." N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Nov. 2013.
Death. Only two things are certain in life, death, and taxes. As the Human condition is concerned death is directly related to mortality. Mortality is in a sense the focus of all human existence. In most cases, the human mind inadvertently neglects this concept. In the true depth of mortality is hidden behind a shroud of humor. In the inquisitive, the brain creates a logical fallacy to cope with the concept. The basis of the human condition is mortality. The main points of the human condition are birth, growth, emotionality, aspiration, conflict, and mortality. Birth, growth, and aspiration all stem from the concept of mortality.
Mortality, the subject of death, has been a curious topic to scholars, writers, and the common man. Each with their own opinion and beliefs. My personal belief is that one should accept mortality for what it is and not go against it.
Jahi McMath is a 13-year-old girl living in Oakland, CA who was declared brain dead by multiple neurologists more than three months ago. Jahi was declared brain-dead December 12th after barriers during surgery a few days earlier to remove her tonsils, adenoids, and uvula at Children's Hospital & Research Center Oakland. At least three neurologists confirmed that Jahi was unable to breathe on her own, had no blood flow to her brain, and had no sign of electrical activity in her brain. Moreover, a court order kept Jahi's body on a ventilator while independent experts could be brought in to confirm the results (Wells, 2014). Even so, the McMath family was able to secure the release of Jahi's body through the county coroner, who issued a death certificate, and have been keeping her on a ventilator at an undisclosed facility ever since. This all occurred after Children’s Hospital released Jahi due to her severe brain damage along with the probability of the hospital receiving profit from discharging Jahi before her or her family were ready for her to be released (Johnson and Rhodes, 2010, p. 61).
The Harvard Criteria is defined as followed; if a person is unreceptive and unresponsive, there is no movement and no spontaneous respiration or other spontaneous muscular movement, no reflexes, a flat EEG, and lastly no circulation to or within the brain. Kastenbaum explains that there is different type of conditions that might make a patient nonresponsive. Which “several of these conditions could be mistaken for brain death by uninformed observers (Kastanbuam, 45). Some of the conditions that Kastenbaum talks about are akinetic mutism, catatonia, coma, or the locked-in sydrome. He explains that these conditions are different and that one similarity they all have in common is an “impression of terminal no responsiveness. By contrast, we might be impressed by the nonpurposive reflexes and grimaces of a person in a persistent or permanent vegetative state and thereby persuade ourselves that the person is still there (Kastanbaum, 45). If we follow the traditional determination of death, and compare it with the Harvard Criteria we notice that in order to determine if a person is dead they would not display any signs of being alive. If patient are showing signs of being alive why wouldn’t physicians consider that. It does not mean that because they are nonresponsive that they are brain dead especially if they are displaying signs of being alive. Kastabum states that it is a “harrowing similarity to being buried alive” (Kastabum, 45). A person can be brain dead but does not mean they are dead, the person that make the decisions on their ending of life should really look more deeper into seeing if the patient is completely gone, but displaying signs of being alive means you are alive disregarding of what a physician might
The play, The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, written by William Shakespeare in the early 1600s, uses deaths to emphasize the idea of mortality throughout the play. The deaths that occur so frequently in the play are used to atone for wrongs done by the characters earlier in the play. Two major deaths that occur are the deaths of King Claudius and Ophelia. All of these characters did a wrong to one or more persons and in the end of the play they all paid for their wrongs by being murdered or committing suicide.
The criteria or definition of brain death was re-examined in 1968 by a committee at Harvard Medical School and is part of the criteria used today. They defined it as when a patient; is unresponsive to stimulus; cannot move or breathe without the aid of a ventilator and has no brain stem reflexes. Several tests are done in order to determine if a patient meets these criteria and this can be done by physicians and neurologists. A brain dead patient is legally dead and a death cer...
Thanatology is derived from the Greek word Thanatos, which means death; Death of the physical self and death of the internal self. As Sigmund Freud institutes in his work Beyond the Pleasure Principle there are two drives in the brain that both coincide and conflict within the individual and one of these drives is death itself. Eros is the drive of life, love, creativity, sexuality, self-satisfaction, and species preservation. Thanatos consists of aggression, sadism, destruction, violence and the unknown thoughts of death (Freud, 1953). These self-destructive characteristics are present in all human beings, but they are in the unconscious part of the mind that can be accessed but can also be repressed in order to survive (Freud, 1953). The
Life and death represent a dyad; their definitions inherently depend on one another. Simply defined, death is the cessation of life. Similarly, life can be defined as not death; however, not everything not alive is dead. Boniolo and Di Fiore explain this dyadic relationship well, and other authors have cited this interdependency to better define life and death.1-6 The academic literature contains multiple definitions for both terms depending on which discipline or interest group attempts the definition. Nair-Collins provides a thorough discourse on this diversity in terms of death, differentiating between “biological death, death of the person, death of the moral agent, death of the moral patient, legal death, and the commonsense notion of death.”2(p.667,668,675) Through the dyadic relationship, similar groupings could be arrived at for defining life. Whether or not one accepts Nair-Collins’ categories, at least some differentiation of this type is necessary given the complexity of these concepts. I propose a simplified categorization of the definitions of life and death: (1)scientific/biological, (2)medic...
Death is the equalizer of all life. Throughout time people have constructed death in many different ways. For ancient civilizations, such as Mesopotamia, Egypt, Ugarit, Greece, and Rome, death consisted of burial rituals and practices, the construction of monuments, murals, and stele, and offering libations to the dead. These civilizations shared many aspects in their perceptions of death and the afterlife, but those perceptions also varied enough to be individualistic and unique to each civilization. Among the many differences between civilizations’ perceptions, some of the variations involved the location of graves, the type of monuments constructed, the structure of the funeral, and preparation of the dead body for the funeral. The relationship
Pawar, A. K. (2009). the diagnosis of brain death. Retrieved january 29, 2014, from ncbi.nlm.nih.gov: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2772257/
John L McIntosh. (2003) . Handbook of Death and Dying. Volume 1: The Presence of Death. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Reference.
The concept of brain death is not something that can be easily determined at just a glance. It is an intricate course of tests and time to determine if the process of brain function is evident. An important series of questions to ask yourself is, “what constitutes brain death,” “how is it defined, “and “what happens afterwards?” Brain death is not to be confused with a coma because they are entirely different. Organ donation is the most common outcome of someone who is diagnosed brain dead. If this occurs first hand to you or your family member, would you go out of your way to determine if the doctors were correct? This essay will explain the tests that are performed on the body that is thought to be brain dead, the difference between brain death and a coma, and how families could possibly handle the results of a person being determined brain dead.
The concept between life and death cannot simply exist without one another, where the topic is widely discussed throughout “When Breath Becomes Air” by Paul Kalanithi. This memoir explores Paul’s definition of death as he passes through the distinct “stages” of his life. As Paul progresses through each stage, he views death differently as he transformed from a student to a neurosurgeon, neurosurgeon to a patient, and eventually becoming a father, where he needed to take full responsibility as an adult.
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Defining Death: A Report on the Medical, Legal and Ethical Issues in the Determination of Death. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1981.