Dbq Essay On Charity

The choices each of us make impact the perspectives we hold to this day over many controversial issues. For example, one debate includes defining the ethics of charity. Some people suggest that charity creates happy and well-off people through the act of donation. However, they fail to recognize that charity illustrates the ugly behavior of donating for promotion of self-image versus the false intent of supporting others needs. Charity is defined as organizations that raise money in support of a cause, but this idea creates a negative society. People should be encouraged to provide for themselves BECAUSE money alters good into self-interest,consequently tainting the purpose of charity.
One instance of unfavorable human behavior in relation

The sole interest of government is to aid and represent the people it governs. When organizations like poverty-stricken groups receive help from charities “governments might be more likely to focus on dealing with… [them] if they weren't being helped by charities.”(Source B, Para. 4) Less help is done because the need is falsely filled. Furthermore, these special interest groups weaken the ethicality of the deed achieved because “‘for every act of charity, applied to heal suffering… serves to weaken the personal springs of social reform, alike by the 'miraculous' relief it brings… softening influence it exercises on the hearts and heads of those who witness it.’”(Source B, Para. 4) As a result, people begin to overestimate the ability of charities and underestimate the ability of

Critics for charity suggest three points: First, charity relieves the tension caused from an issue through money. Furthering to acknowledge that “giving to those who are lacking, shows you are grateful for what you have and want to help make sure that others have their needs met as well.” (Source A, Para. 8) Proposing that more good deeds occur through these charitable acts than the corruption caused. Second, critics may believe that the government fulfills its role in aiding those in need, and that charity also allows this system to help more people. With two sources of support, more people would be saved, and “Two hundred dollars… if it is true that this could help save one child's life… I think people who are able but do not donate should be condemned.” (Schaefer, Para. 7) When a simple solution is given for a need, ethically one should not ignore the opportunity to serve a better purpose. Third, critics also state that focusing on a specific group helps the most unfortunate and starts to take care of the root of the problem. Logistically helping those who are the most desperate is a convincing argument and that “through those acts of charitable giving, it makes the world a better place as those in need begin to possess a new outlook on life.” (Source A, Para. 4) Although detractors fail to recognize that money is deficient in stopping or solving the social issue. Countless times the same issues like