Current Day T-Group Training

1171 Words3 Pages

Current Day T-Group Training and Research
In this decade alone, tens of thousands of managers have attended at least one series of human relations training (better known as T-Group training), which is based on social-psychological principles (Harrow et al., 1971). Kurt Lewin developed the T-Group model in 1947 while working at the National Training Laboratories in Bethel, Maine (Weis et al., 2009). Lewin’s T-Group model has proven to be an exceptional approach for training in interpersonal and group dynamics, emotional intelligence, and personal development (Kass et al., 1989, Weis et al., 2009).
A T-Group usually consists of six to eight members of upper and/or middle level managers who often meet off site to explore and evaluate their …show more content…

The non-structured approach allows open and fluent communication by participants to select the topics of discussion and set goal attainment procedures. Some of the goals of a typical T-Group are; (1) to increase awareness of your feelings in the present, (2) to increase awareness of how your behavior impacts others, (3) to enhance feedback skills, (4) to enhance conflict management skills, (5) to increase awareness of other’s feelings, (6) to critique your interpersonal communication skills, (7) to learn to make authentic conscious choices, (8) to gain knowledge and practice skills in group dynamics and team development. . . (Weis et al, 2009). Theoretical goals of T-Group training vary but their main focus is on freeing inhibitions of prior social interactions to allow participants to become more sensitive to their self and others while developing greater interpersonal competence (Harrow et al., …show more content…

Thus, if we visualize how uncomfortable it must be to set in a circle with half a dozen participants with a trainer and/or team of observers analyzing your every word and gesture. And then take into account that the group is restricted to focus all discussion in the here-and-now without any given agenda, in the presence of a trainer ready to interfere if anyone strays from the rules. The author agrees that this format sounds like a situation ensured to promote participant frustration, anger, and resistance. Appropriately, a large portion of this resistance is a result of performance anxiety. The majority of attendees are professionals who are used to mastering the necessary skills for success (Weis et al., 2009). But, the ability to interact naturally and genuinely in the present moment without an agenda is not an easily mastered skill and they become frustrated and angry with the format and the trainer (Weis et al.,

Open Document