Critical Incident Stress Debriefing: A Case Study

1202 Words3 Pages

1.) Two facts presented by each side of the critical issue? Between the two articles there are many details that differ from both sides on numerous issues, which seem to be completely different from one another. Peter Cotton as well as Grant Devilly suggested that critical incident stress debriefing also known as (CISD) was outdated by (CISM) Foundation, due to research pertaining to CISD (Halgin, 2009). Jeffrey Mitchel rebuttals that CISD was changed from the full field based on the inception, nonetheless the authorized periodical from Internal Critical Incident Stress Foundation has repetitively simplified CISD as a minor group process, which has become the key term for the whole field of research (Halgin, 2009). Both Devilly and Cotton emphasized …show more content…

Acute stress disorder can last anywhere form 2 days to a month from the first incident-and this becomes the precursor for the onset of post-traumatic stress disorder, that can last a month or longer from the first incident. Devilly and Cotton suggest that cognitive behavioral therapy can be more effective than CISD at stopping post-traumatic stress disorder from developing (Halgin, 2009). Mitchel responds suggesting that there have never been negative issues that have come from the study of CISD when mental health professionals adhere to the high standards of the practice (Mitchell, 2004). Mitchel also speaks of that cognitive behavioral therapy and CISD are not competing with one another, suggesting psychotherapy could not possibly replace crisis therapy or the opposite (Mitchell, …show more content…

His research further explains the research done by Cotton and Devilly. Mitchel suggests that CISD will clearly help longer than just the few weeks after the traumatic experience occurs (Mitchell, 2004). The only downfall I found within the research was that Mitchel clearly does not lean his research on statistics or factual evidence. It would have been nice to see Mitchel do some clear cut studies to validate the facts of CISD for long term treatment (Mitchell, 2004). Mitchel suggests that CISM is a positive treatment program (Mitchell, 2004). Mitchel however, doesn’t really speak of how ASD will turn into PTSD for those who use CISD (Mitchell, 2004). This would have created more reliability to his

Open Document