Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Concept of stakeholder theory
The stakeholder theory case
Strengths and limitations of stakeholder theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Concept of stakeholder theory
The question of whether or not corporations should have the responsibility to keep environmental sustainability is an important one, because human life is based on environment. In this paper, I argue that even though environment is not the stakeholder to corporations, it has the right equal to persons that it should be protected and well taken care of in the business activities. Due to the shortcomings of the arguments for environment as stakeholders, I will argue for the necessity of a more flexible framework for discussion of this topic, in which sustainability should be embedded in stakeholder theory rather than being treated as a marginal issue.
I need to define the terms that I use in my following arguments. A corporation is an association of individuals to obtain profit, and corporations can only act through people. A person is an individual with rights and duties. Environment is something that provides basic conditions for humans to live and it is affected by human actions as well. Environment is as important as humans. A sustainable business works based on three elements: people, planet and profit; it is a business that carries social responsibility, which is to take care of the environment and the society (people). Sustainability is an ability or capacity of something to be maintained or to sustain itself, in other words, human and environment sustainability depends on humans and how humans treat the environment.
Corporations have responsibility to take care of their employees, because employees are persons with rights and duties, of course they are the ones to make profit for the business. Both employees and shareholders are the stakeholders of the business. They have rights and duties as persons; they have a commo...
... middle of paper ...
...le persons that have rights and duties, and the actions of a corporations symbol a group of persons. When the environment provides the resources, humans have the responsibility to protect and take care of nature. Environment deserves the equal right as humans, it should weigh the same as human stakeholders; thus, sustainability should be embedded in stakeholder theory.
Works Cited
Bendheim, C. L., Waddock, S., & Graves, S. (1998). Determining best practice in corporate-stakeholder relations using data envelopment analysis: An industry level study. Business and Society, 37(3), 306–338.
"Corporation." Dictionary.com. Dictionary.com, n.d. Web. 15 Apr. 2014.
Phillips, R., Robert; Edward, Freeman. Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. 2003. Print.
"What Is Sustainability?" What Is Sustainability? N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Apr. 2014.
Business today has so many responsibilities. Aside from making a profit, they are forced to take on a different responsibility, one that involves the environment. Even though, they already have many regulations set by the government, they are still being asked to answer to the call of helping out the rest of society take of nature. This essay will discuss the pros and cons of corporate responsibility for the environment through the agent-of-society and agent-of-capital views.
This paper will have a detailed discussion on the shareholder theory of Milton Friedman and the stakeholder theory of Edward Freeman. Friedman argued that “neo-classical economic theory suggests that the purpose of the organisations is to make profits in their accountability to themselves and their shareholders and that only by doing so can business contribute to wealth for itself and society at large”. On the other hand, the theory of stakeholder suggests that the managers of an organisation do not only have the duty towards the firm’s shareholders; rather towards the individuals and constituencies who contribute to the company’s wealth, capacity and activities. These individuals or constituencies can be the shareholders, employees, customers, local community and the suppliers (Freeman 1984 pp. 409–421).
Sustainability grows into a collective tenure in commercial morals, environs and is extensively used by the administrations, businesses, advisers etc. In recent times the conception of sustainability is widened,nowadays it not only comprisesecologicaldeliberation but also monetary and communityconcern. (Elkington, 1998).
Corporate culture is important to maintaining organizational controls. Through corporate culture, a company can promote values, beliefs, and ethics. Everyone has their own individual values, beliefs, and ethics, but as an organization, it must enforce ethics through its senior leaders, codes of conducts, and compliance programs. Just as companies can have negative impact on individuals, it can also have a positive effect on its workers. “Self-regulation of corpo...
In response to the idea of a corporate responsibility, not an individual’s, many argue that if the corporation is not a person, how can it be held to the same moral guidelines as an individual? After all, don’t people make the decisions, and those same people make up the corporations, and should therefore be held accountable. This theory does not exclude the possibility of upper management being held responsible; rather it includes it for the sake of the company’s survival.
The concept of stakeholder capitalism has been misconstrued over the years because of misunderstandings about the “moral foundations” and fundamentals of stakeholder capitalism. The common ideal of capitalism is that business is an essential part of society rather than a separate entity. The primal question is if the responsibility of the business is to that to the stakeholders or shareholders. However, the goal of the company is actually to be profitable while maintaining a balance between shareholders and stockholders. The reading further goes on to illustrate the four principles of stakeholder capitalism: stakeholder co-operation, complexity, continuous creation, and emergent competition. The model behind stakeholder capitalism is that it aids the business in becoming an institution with morals and values; it goes beyond just earning profit. The central argument is that business and ethics must coincide with each other for a business to fully progress.
In the article, The Truth About CSR by Kasturi Rangan, Lisa Chase, and Sohel Karim, the importance that coherence plays in corporate social responsibility (CSR), is emphasized. Throughout the article, corporate social responsibility application, within corporations, is broken down into three theaters. According to the article, many corporations do not focus on their CSR programs, and usually see these CSR actions as a secondary responsibility following the responsibility they hold towards their shareholders. It is argued in the article that in CSR is a key and essential block for corporate success, focusing on CSR coherence throughout all three theaters will bring positive results along the way, possibly making the corporation
In conclusion, I have to say that there is a solid invisible relationship between impacts of businesses on environments, profitability of sustainable business, and responsibility of business. When one of these ones changes, it will effect to others. When a business adapts efficient and sustainable system, it will reduce negative externalities and increase positive externalities to environment. Once the business adapted efficient business model, it will reduce cost and maximize its profits. Obviously, the sustainable and efficient business model will make the business social more responsible to environments.
Sustainability is about the planet- healthy relation among people, profit and planet. Individual effort to earn money by business activity in the earth should be harmless to environment where it operates and beneficial to the people surviving in that society.
Stakeholders want to be associated with socially responsible companies, and as such expect them to adhere to a certain standard of behaviour in order to gain their trust. Companies are under strong pressure to behave ethically. They have to earn a ‘license to operate’.
Environmental sustainability is making decisions and taking actions in the interest of protecting the natural world, preserving the capability of the environment to support human life and ensuring that humans use the environment in a way that does not harm the environment. It also questions how economic development affects our environment vice versa.
Examples of Stakeholder’s could be: managers, directors, employees etc. It is based upon a conceptual framework approach in which it provides moral and ethical values to a business organisation. When in practice, majority of organisations are mainly going to focus on corporate social responsibility. The reason for this is because CSR is seen to have a big impact on the firm as many people are recognising that there is a increasing number of businesses that are both socially and environmentally friendly. On the other hand, if the government doesn’t intervene with companies in terms of both regulation and legislation, this means that firms will only be concentrating on the accounting figures. If companies are primarily focusing on the accounting figures, this indicates that businesses are not taking in the social and environmental impact of the activities within the organisation. In (Liu, Fellows and Tuuli, 2011), it refers to corporate citizenship values in which it considers and identifies the different demands of the stakeholder groups to see where the overall value of the company comes from taking into thought the environment and
However, there can be more definitions about what Corporate Social Responsibility can be. For example, Corporate Social Responsibility can be the commitment which is continuing for a business to behave ethically and bring to economy the development to improve the workforces’ of the whole society and local community and their families’ quality of life. Corporate Social Responsibility is also known as the obligation of a company to serve the society’s interest and of course its own. With the help of the Corporate and Social Responsibility, social and environmental concerns companies can integrate into their business and stakeholders operations.
The sustainability of the ecosystems on which the global economy depends must be guaranteed. And the economic partners must be satisfied that the basis of exchange is equitable” (World). This quote demonstrates the complexities of sustainability. Another thing corporations should focus on when trying to be sustainable is their environmental impact.
Sustainability can be defined in a number of different ways and is characterized by three main principles and several major components. According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency, “sustainability creates and maintains the conditions under which humans and nature can exist in harmony, that permit fulfilling the social, economic, and other requirements of present and future generations” (“Sustainability”). Sustainability is made up of three principles: environmental, economic, and social. The social aspect of sustainability involves ensuring that all people are treated justly and liv...