Freeman's Stakeholder Theory Of Corporate Social Responsibility

716 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Stakeholder theories any group or individual

Corporate social responsibility has changed over the years, which causes organisations to adapt to ensure that the company is able to prosper. Corporate social responsibility refers to the company’s long-term view; proactivity and attaining more informed knowledge. Altruism is the unselfish concern for the welfare of others, the stakeholders in the company. Corporate social responsibility is an important concept understood by many businesses, be it small and medium enterprises or large and multinational organisations. Therefore, majority of organisations do not undertake corporate social responsibility initiatives primarily for altruistic reasons. This will be explained with reference to Friedman’s shareholder theory, Freeman’s stakeholder …show more content…

Many organisations have come to understand both theories and over time have adapted to using Freeman’s stakeholder theory. However, according to Sen and Cowley (2012), it is known that stakeholder theorists neither oppose Friedman’s idea of profit maximisation, nor defend the opinion that managers only have ethical obligations towards shareholders. These two theories are adopted differently according to the organisation. This is to ensure that whichever theory the organisation obeys, it will allow for the company to benefit instead of lose out to other …show more content…

These companies would follow Freeman’s stakeholder theory. Njite, Hancer, and Slevitch (2011) believed that leaders have the power to influence the workers’ attitudes and the ability to create a work and social climate to increase morale (cited by Rodríguez Bolívar, Garde Sánchez & López Hernández, 2014). Being altruistic is being able to be concerned about the welfare of everyone in the organisation and ensuring that they will be able to give back to the community. Freeman’s theory emphasizes on surpassing profit maximisation and focusing on what benefits stakeholders, not only shareholders (Lindorff and Peck, 2010). The Economist Intelligence Unit (2005) states that companies which emphasise on corporate social responsibility are known to have healthier long-term financial

Show More
Related

  • Cameco Corporation Case Study Essay

    877 Words  | 2 Pages

    Whilst many firms’ Corporate Responsibility efforts prove to be counterproductive, pitting business against society and pressuring companies to think of generic CSR responses, addressing social issues by creating shared value for both society and the firm can ultimately increase profitability and operational sustainability (Kramer, 2006). In the case of Cameco, the corporation’s 5 pillar strategy demonstrates a strategic ethics policy (Moroz et al, 2015), its focus on creating shared-value enhancing the overall effectiveness of business operations in terms of increased worker productivity through improved working and living environments, and increased revenue due to more efficient operations. As measures of stakeholder power, strategic posture, and economic performance are significantly linked to levels of corporate social disclosure (Roberts, 1992), it is evident that adopting wholesome ethical processes in business practices can aid U92 in the achievement of business

    Read More

  • Milton Friedman's Essay Analysis of The Social Responsibility to Increase Profit

    720 Words  | 2 Pages

    In this essay we take a look at the famous Milton Friedman's essay "The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Profit ". The following paper is an attempt to critically evaluate the article in consideration of Freeman Stakeholder Theory. First thing, let us start with a little overview of what Milton Friedman exposed in his article. It seems that the whole point of his essay revolves around one basic statement which clearly says that the only social responsibility of a business is to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long it stays within the rules of the game (Milton Friedman, the social responsibility of a business is to increase profit). We probably all agree that the primary objective of any business is to achieve revenue and attain a certain profit.

    Read More

  • The Top Three Competitiors of the American Repertory Theater

    807 Words  | 2 Pages

    Corporate Social Responsibility is the obligation from corporations to utilize their resources to aid and benefit the larger society. The four components of CSR are economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic. Social Responsibility is a fundamental force in the wealth creation process. If correctly demonstrated, CSR should heighten competitiveness and boost the value of wealth creation to society. A company's CSR Initiatives directly represent who the company is and what it believes it. The m...

    Read More

  • Friedman vs Freeman

    1937 Words  | 4 Pages

    This paper will have a detailed discussion on the shareholder theory of Milton Friedman and the stakeholder theory of Edward Freeman. Friedman argued that “neo-classical economic theory suggests that the purpose of the organisations is to make profits in their accountability to themselves and their shareholders and that only by doing so can business contribute to wealth for itself and society at large”. On the other hand, the theory of stakeholder suggests that the managers of an organisation do not only have the duty towards the firm’s shareholders; rather towards the individuals and constituencies who contribute to the company’s wealth, capacity and activities. These individuals or constituencies can be the shareholders, employees, customers, local community and the suppliers (Freeman 1984 pp. 409–421).

    Read More

  • T.J. Maxx CSR

    1886 Words  | 4 Pages

    Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the way a corporation achieves a balance between its economic, social, and environmental responsibilities in its operations so as to address shareholder and other stakeholder expectations. In general, when firms hold this wider encouraging role on the public by being engaged with stakeholders, a variety of profit can be produced for both company and the stakeholders. A key inclination is the combination of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into the organization strategy, culture, mission and communications. By incorporating corporate citizenship into the company it is no longer an additional “nice thing to do” or something made to obey laws or regulations. Instead, corporate responsibility has become something business leaders and workforce want to engage in, frequently because executives who believe in the long-term see business profit. The four types of social responsibilities a...

    Read More

  • Corporate Social Responsibility

    1700 Words  | 4 Pages

    There is a link between corporate social responsibility and the key principles of the stakeholders, which a company should follow to be responsible to its stakeholders. The first stakeholder is environment and the key principle used for it is not damage the environment for example, recycling, dealing correctly with their wastes and emissions. The second stakeholder is the employees. The key principle for the employees is companies providing safe and health working conditions for their staff. Moreover, the employees earn an appropriate salary for ...

    Read More

  • Exploring Milton Friedman's Corporate Social Responsibility Theory

    1064 Words  | 3 Pages

    Today’s 21st century has brought forth many changes, both positive and negative, as well as, an extremely diverse society whose different needs and wants must be met. Therefore, in an attempt to sustain a balance and comprehend today’s challenges, society as well as, businesses tend to adopt and incorporate certain methods, systems, and theories. As a matter of fact, in the past, the Milton Friedman’s theory of corporate social responsibility was adopted and very influential (Friedman, 1962). The Milton Friedman’s theory stated that the obligation of a business was to maximize its profits, and that business executives had a responsibility to their shareholders rather than to the greater good of society (Friedman, 1962). However, since things and people have evolved throughout the years, the perception of Milton Friedman’s theory has been impacted. Therefore, in this paper, one will further discuss the Milton Friedman Goal of the Firm, its relevancy as it applies to apprehending the purpose of a business in society, and whether or not the government or society portrays a role in expanding the Friedman discussion.

    Read More

  • Corporate Social Responsibility Analysis: Wells Fargo

    958 Words  | 2 Pages

    An organization’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) drives them to look out for the different interests of society. Most business corporations undertake responsibility for the impact of their organizational pursuits and various activities on their customers, employees, shareholders, communities and the environment. With the high volume of general competition between different companies and organizations in varied fields, CSR has become a morally imperative commitment, more than one enforced by the law. Most organizations in the modern world willingly try to improve the general well-being of not only their employees, but also their families and the society as a whole.

    Read More

  • Business Ethics: Cost-Benefits Analysis

    921 Words  | 2 Pages

    Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian

    Read More

  • Stakeholders in Airport Decision Making

    1401 Words  | 3 Pages

    Stakeholders are those groups or individual in society that have a direct interest in the performance and activities of business. The main stakeholders are employees, shareholders, customers, suppliers, financiers and the local community. Stakeholders may not hold any formal authority over the organization, but theorists such as Professor Charles Handy believe that a firm’s best long-term interests are served by paying close attention to the needs of each of these stakeholders. The modern view is that a firm has responsibilities to all its stakeholders i.e. everyone with a legitimate interest in the company. These include shareholders, competitors, government, employees, directors, distributors, customers, sub-contractors, pressure groups and local community. Although a company’s directors owes a legal duty to the shareholders, they also have moral responsibilities to other stakeholder group’s objectives in their entirely. As a firm can’t meet all stakeholders’ objectives in their entirety, they have to compromise. A company should try to serve the needs of these groups or individuals, but whilst some needs are common, other needs conflict. By the development of this second runway, the public and stakeholders are affected in one or other way and it can be positive and negative.

    Read More

  • Views on Corporate Social Responsibility

    1003 Words  | 3 Pages

    While the concept of an individual having responsibility is commonly recognized, modern views have lead to the emerging issue of corporate responsibility. Business Directory.com defines corporate social responsibility as, “A company’s sense of responsibility towards the community and environment (both ecological and social) in which it operates. Companies express this citizenship (1) through their waste and pollution reduction processes, (2) by contributing educational and social programs, and (3) by earning adequate returns on the employed resources.” But such a concept has been much disputed since at least the 1970’s.

    Read More

  • Performance Management Essay

    1020 Words  | 3 Pages

    When using performance management to improve an organisation’s productivity you need to first decide who is the focus of the organisation’s long term goals, are they focusing on Shareholders or Stakeholders. The Shareholder approach focuses on the profit to the shareholders, no other factors need to be considered aside from the bottom line profits. The Stakeholder approach is a well-rounded, balanced approach to management, considering more than just how much money the organisation makes.

    Read More

  • Importance Of Corporate Social Responsibility

    1000 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the current time of growth and progression, individuals should know that how a business not only flourish but sustain itself. Making profit is one of the main targets of every corporates but it must not be the only one. When an individual builds a company in order to do business, they should be well aware of their contribution towards the society as well as their business and employees in it. It is total strategy of all. We should be able to realize every increment contributes of it. One of the major factors that affect a business is how well it participates in Corporate Social Responsibility. According to (Werther & Chandler, 2006) corporate social responsibility (CSR) refers to a business practice that involves participating in initiatives that benefits the society. In authenticity, there is a whole lot to argue about it. There are no major guidelines that decides either a business is participating in Corporate Social Responsibility; what might be considered a Business practicing CSR to some, can still not be accepted for it by others. CSR may be restrained a term which his highly flexible. This paper will discuss about Corporate Social Responsibility and its

    Read More

  • Essay On Corporate Social Responsibility

    1275 Words  | 3 Pages

    Corporate Social Responsibility is an organisation’s obligation to serve the company’s own interest and the one’s of the society. Moreover, Corporate Social Responsibility has a definition of a concept where the companies integrate social and the environmental concerns into their own business operation and also on a basis of voluntary with their interactions they have with the stakeholders. Corporate Social Resp...

    Read More

  • Corporate Social Responsibility Essay

    2186 Words  | 5 Pages

    Both of these areas are the lifeblood of the company, and any benefit to them should not be overlooked. Before a company can become proficient at corporate social responsibility, they must first know its definition. Corporate social responsibility is defined as actions that can be taken by a company to ensure they are adhering to ethical and social responsibilities of the day. These corporate social actions are self-regulatory, as a company strives to adhere to guidelines while also going above and beyond being a Good Samaritan in the business world (ECA, 2015). This can place certain businesses at the forefront in customers mind because of the example they are setting in the marketplace. A company going above and beyond the call of duty to work towards a more philanthropic approach in the surrounding community is a perfect example for corporate social responsibility. Going deeper into the definition, corporate social responsibility acts like a “double bottom line” for a company, as they strive to achieve financial goals, but also achieve their social mission out in the community. Once a company is aware of what the concept of corporate social responsibility is, they can now implement it and start to reap the many benefits of its

    Read More

More about Freeman's Stakeholder Theory Of Corporate Social Responsibility

Open Document