Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of Brutus in Julius Caesar
Misinterpretations in julius caesar
The role of Brutus in Julius Caesar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of Brutus in Julius Caesar
In the classical play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, a group of conspirators plot to murder an influential figure in their government in fear of his rise to tyranny. Among these conspirators includes Cassius, the primary conspirator responsible for gathering influential figures, such as Brutus and Casca, for Caesar’s death. One of the more notable accomplices and close friend to Caesar, Brutus, only endeavors to execute Caesar for altruistic objectives. Whereas most conspirators, including Cassius, propose to assassinate Julius Caesar because of their envy of his increasing amount of power.
Caesar provides the best description of Cassius to his friend, Mark Antony, upon passing, in which, “Cassius has a lean and hungry look; he thinks too much, such men are dangerous” (Act I, sc. II, 1106). The characterization is indefinite when Cassius first enters the story by proclaiming to his companion, Brutus, that he rarely notices the love that was common for Brutus to express to his friends. When Brutus responds that he had been recently experiencing
…show more content…
II, 1104). Also, while on a trip to Spain, he witnessed an event in which Caesar “did shake… His coward lips did from their color fly and that same eye whose bend doth awe the world did lose its luster… and that tongue of his that bade the Romans mark him and write his speeches in their books… cried… as a sick girl” (Act I, sc. II, 1104). With Caesar’s fragile condition, Cassius questions how “a man of such feeble temper should get the start of the majestic world and bear the palm alone” (Act I, sc. II, 1104), suggesting that Caesar is not healthy enough to carry out his duties with his epileptic episodes, and this vulnerability will be deciphered by enemies as a weakness of the
Throughout Julius Caesar Brutus acts in accordance with his morals, which makes his eventual fall all the more tragic as Brutus genuinely believed his actions benefitted the future of Rome. Unlike most of the self-interested people around him, Brutus genuinely cares for the continued well-being of the Roman republic. Brutus sees Caesar's rise to power and imminent crowning as a danger to the freedom of the people in Rome since, "crown [Caesar] that, and then I grant we put a sting in him that at his will he may do danger with. Th' abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power" (2.1.15-19). Brutus knows that many past rulers have turned into tyrants and oppressed their people after gaining substantial authority, and fears that the same tragedy will befall Rome if the Senate crowns Caesar. And although Brutus conspires to kill Caesar rather than finding a peaceful solution to this disagreement, he tells the other conspirators to limit their violence as "this shall make our purpose necessary and not envious, which so appearing to the common eyes, we shall be called purgers, not murderers" (2.1.175-178). Brutus' constant requests to preform the assassination quickly and honorably reveal his concern about the fate of the Romans acts as the motivation behind his actions (unlike the other conspirators who "did that they did in envy of great Caesar") (5.5.71).
The significance of the passage I chose to analyze is often overlooked. It is a monologue from Portia, Brutus’s wife, taking place in Rome, at Brutus’s Orchard during the first scene of act II. Brutus is convincing himself that the plot against Caesar is a righteous decision, by speculating that Caesar´s nature would change upon being crowned, resulting in a tyrant. He then receives the false letters Cassius wrote, intended to deceive him into thinking they are the words of anonymous citizens testifying Caesar’s alleged inappropriate ambition, he is partially convinced to proceed with the conspiracy. Shortly after, the conspirators enter the scene and discuss the terms: Who will be involved and how the murder will be carried out.
Julius Caesar (100-44 BC) was one of the most outstanding leaders in history. He was the first ruler of the Romano-Hellenic civilization and achieved his goals with great success throughout his life of 56 years. He was assassinated by the conspirators, who accused him for practicing tyranny. This essay will discuss whether it was right for the conspirators to murder Caesar and what its consequences were.
So from this information, Cassius has a different characteristic when compared to Caesar. The overall comparison of these two characters is that Cassius is a very loving and caring person; however, Caesar shows that it comes off as he is a very self-conceited person and cares about his position, his wealth, and loves the drama. But deep down, Caesar is still a good person as
The plotting to assassinate Caesar took nearly the majority of the play. During Julius Caesar’s parade following his victory against Pompey: Cassius took Brutus off to the side and talked to him about his plot to kill Caesar, but Brutus does not understand why he should be killed. So Cassius says, “ I was born as free as Caesar; so were you”(1.2.96). Cassius is trying to use evidence that Caesar is mortal, so he can convince Brutus to join the conspiracy. Cassius finds Casca in the forest at night and begins a speech to get him to join as well. Cassius says, “you are dull, Casca, and these sparks of life that should be in a Roman you do want”(1.3.56) to Casca. Cassius comes to Casca also to convince him to kill Caesar with him. Cassius spends lots of time going around trying to get people in his conspiracy, and once he gets people they go on and plan how/where they will kill Caesar.
In act 2 of Jc the conspirators gather at Brutus's orchard to discuss how they want to kill Caesar, in the meeting they discuss how they want to kill him as well as when and where they will do it. The major part of the story focuses on the meeting the conspirators have, they all are debating how will strike as well as who else will they kill ( Mark Anthony was one of those people they wanted to kill ). The connection between the book and the game is the way we went about performing the game and how we gathered and decided who the killers were going to be the killers then hid within the students/victims to make it hard for the detectives to figure out who were the killers . The procedure of figuring out who were the killers of the game closely resembled the meeting the conspirators had to figure out who else
In the beginning of the Book Cassius uses anecdotes of Caesar’s weakness and faults, argumentum ad antiquatum, and ethos on Brutus to persuade him to join the conspiracy to kill Caesar, this works on Brutus and shows that anyone, even people as stoic as Brutus, can be persuaded by appealing to their motivations. Cassius, a very suspicious character thru ought the play tells Brutus to “be not jealous on me” (827), in the quote he tells Brutus to not be suspicious of him because he is just a friend who genuinely cares. Cassius does this to put himself on Brutus’ side and not seem like a distant person, this allows him to criticize Caesar and suggest that he is a bad influence on Rome which appeals to Brutus’ desire to keeping Rome safe. After setting himself up as a friend to Brutus, Cassius uses harsh anecdotes on the weakness of Caesar to show that he isn’t fit to rule Rome. Cassius recollects on a time when he and Caesar went swimming in the river Tiber and Caesar screamed “Help me, Cassius or I sink” (828) to de...
Near the middle of Brutus’s monologue, he expresses to Brutus his surprise of the potential for someone like Caesar who is frail to single handedly rule the Roman Empire: “A man of such a feeble temper should/So get the start of the majestic world/And bear the palm alone”(Act 1, Scene 2, lines 136-138). In this quotation, Shakespeare's use of both pathos and ethos can be seen. Cassius uses anti-ethos in the phrase, “a man of such feeble temper” to illuminate that Caesar is weak and in turn break his credibility as a good leader. This is due to the fact that weakness is not a desired trait in a leader and if this trait is prevalent in a leader, it can decrease their support. Moreover, Cassius uses pathos to manipulate Brutus by creating anger through highlighting the weakness in the leader of the Roman Empire. Anger is also created because of the thought of a single, all powerful leader ruling over the Romans, especially one who is weak. The use of this rhetoric is intended to manipulate Brutus into assisting Cassius and the conspirators in the murder of Caesar. Around the end of Cassius’s monologue, he questions why Caesar is allowed to act as a god while everyone else is bellow him: “Why, man, he doth bestride the narrow world/Like a Colossus, and we petty men/Walk under his huge legs and peep about/ To find ourselves dishonorable graves”(Act 1, Scene 2, lines 142-145). In this quotation,
In Shakespeare's famous play, Julius Caesar, we are predominately shown people who are hierarchical to the citizens of Rome using manipulation and persuasion to their advantage. These rhetorical skills are mainly shown between two great powers: Brutus, a nobleman who is well respected in Rome and a companion of Caesar; and Antony, a man who is not seen as respected as Brutus among the people, but instead he is seen with great power, as he is Caesar’s faithful lieutenant. Leading up to the climax of Caesar’s demise, Brutus is faced with a heavy predicament: either side with a radical conspiracy, or a forming dictatorship. The noble Brutus, due to his love for the republic of Rome, chooses to join the conspiracy unto which is constructed to murder the “ambitious” tyrant, Caesar. Thus, Caesar is murdered in the name of preserving a republican Rome, Brutus is now faced with the challenge of defending his nobility by explaining his
...re about Cassius through the things he does, such as persuading others in the direction of things that go towards what he wants. However, Brutus’ character can be more closely examined by the dialogues of others. As a result of all of this, Shakespeare’s audience has a negative attitude towards Cassius and a positive attitude towards Brutus.
In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar Shakespeare wastes no time in incorporating the recurring theme of manipulation into Act 1 of the play. Enter the ever so cunning Cassius, with his manipulative ways trailing behind as he works his way into recruiting Brutus to his crew of conspirators. During scene 2 of Act 1 when Cassius encounters Brutus he wastes no time in diving into his chance and asks Brutus a very peculiar question, " Can you see your face?". Cassius is asking Brutus if he knows how others view him and then offers to illuminate Brutus of the great love and adoration the people Rome have for him. Cassius is flattering Brutus and persuading him that he is equal to Caesar. Cassius is hoping that by making Brutus realize how amazing he
When all the conspirators gathered together, Brutus and Cassius argued on whether or not Antony should be killed. “I think it is not meet/ Mark Antony, so well beloved of Caesar,/ Should outlive Caesar…. Let Antony and Caesar fall together” (2.1.163-168). Cassius swayed Brutus to kill Antony because he had deep-rooted love for Caesar. Nevertheless, Brutus opposed to kill Antony because if they did, their action would seem too bloody and no longer with good intention. “Our course will seem too bloody…. For Antony is but a limb of Caesar…. And for Mark Antony, think not of him,/ For he can do no more than Caesar’s arm/ When Caesar’s head is off (2.1.169-190). Resolute in his belief, Brutus firmly opposed to Cassius’s idea. Although Brutus denied
In the play "Julius Caesar," Shakespeare characterizes Cassius as the only man in Rome who has fully developed both his intellect and his emotions. Because of this balance, Cassius values love, friendship, and freedom from bondage more strongly than the other men in the play, who are caught in Rome's superficial world of appearances and the empty values founded on appearances. The other characters in "Julius Caesar" are crippled by the self-mutilation necessary to maintain values based on their public images; but Cassius lives beyond his image; yet with an awareness of the functions of both his own and other men's appearances that is necessary for him to exist in Rome's world. Cassius dies a private man. His death is his ultimate freedom from bondage, and it is perhaps inevitable considering his lifelong propensity for self-destructiveness. Cassius' true victory is his ability to stand as a complete man in a society of poseurs and
Cassius also directly compares himself to Caesar. Cassius clearly considers Caesar to be no better than he is, and therefore he is jealous. Later in this conversation, Cassius again speaks of Caesar. Cassius says, “And why should Caesar be a tyrant then? / Poor man, I know that he would be not a wolf / But that he sees the Romans are but sheep; / He were no lion, were not the Roman hinds” (I.iii.103-106). Cassius uses four metaphors in this speech. He compares the Romans to sheep and female deer, and he compares Caesar to a wolf and a lion. Caesar only has power because the people allow him to. If people fought back and weren’t such sheep, he would not be the wolf. If people weren’t as easily dominated as female deer, he would be no lion. Cassius is crediting Caesar’s strength to the weakness of the people. Cassius clearly doesn’t believe Caesar deserves the power he has and is jealous of Caesar’s power. On multiple occasions during the Feast of Lupercal and on the night of the storm, Cassius’ jealousy is
In Act One Scene Two, Cassius tries to persuade Brutus though listing all the flaws in Caesar: