Congress Of Vienna Versus The Paris Peace Conference

851 Words2 Pages

The Congress of Vienna Versus The Paris Peace Conference The Congress of Vienna of 1815 and the Paris Peace Conference of 1919 are similar in countless ways, but are also remarkably different. One example of a difference between them is that in the Congress of Vienna, only Europe was involved, but in the Paris Peace Conference, because it was after a total war, meaning that it affected the whole world, even the civilians, people all around the world (representatives from 32 countries) came to the conference. An example of why the two are alike is, they both wanted to create buffer zones for a two different European countries. That is just a sample of the complex relationship between the Congress of Vienna of 1815 and …show more content…

This clearly shows how different the motives of the Congress of Vienna of 1815 and the Paris Peace Conference of 1919 are. Secondly, there are various differences and similarities between the Congress of Vienna and the Paris Peace Conference in terms of their proceedings. For example they both dealt with changes in territory. The main contributors to the Congress of Vienna was Prince Klemens Von Metternich who was the foreign minister of Austria during 1815 and for The Paris Peace Conference, Woodrow Wilson who was the president of the United States in 1919, Georges Clemenceau of france, David Lloyd George of Great Britain, and Vittorio Orlando of Italy were the most important representatives. Both the Congress of Vienna and the Paris Peace Conference had many wants. Including, the Congress of Vienna wanted to stop all future revolutions in Europe and to make France weaker. The Paris Peace Conference wanted all countries to

More about Congress Of Vienna Versus The Paris Peace Conference

Open Document