Comparing Stone Ages To The Middle Ages

1788 Words4 Pages

Civilizations have evolved from its origination in Africa to the spread of humans around the planet. Changes in the government, changes in the environment, and factors like war and sickness have molded civilization in order to become more resilient. The unique aspect of this is when these changes occurred in the ancient world where society was not interconnected like now, left behind artifacts captured the mood and ideas of their time period. Despite the time lapse from the Stone Ages to the Middle Ages, the presentation of ideas through art has not differed between the periods rather it has evolved to capture the advancement each civilization has made into the world we live in now.
Earliest of all, the Stone Ages was the ignition to the …show more content…

Being located in between two rivers on fertile land, this was really the “cradle of civilization.” In the Stone Ages, we experienced the beginning of people within a civilization working together. Now, in Ancient Mesopotamia, we are looking at this communication on a larger scale between two or more civilizations with different cultures. Cultures in Mesopotamia ranged from the Sumerian in its early times to the Greco-Roman and Sasanian in its late time before the region was taken up by foreign powers. The presence of the people in Mesopotamia was known through the establishment of cities like what we in the Achaemenid Empire with the city of Persepolis. Essentially, the people of Mesopotamia were ruled by leaders of different teachings so this period can be seen as a premature ruling of a small society. The advancement made in Mesopotamia was captured by the Standard of Ur, which was a storytelling box with two sides of opposing ideas. This artifact did originate from the Sumerian culture, a culture that was close with worshipping deities. Analyzing the Standard of Ur, we see the importance of positive relations with the peace side showing people working together in the same direction. Antithetical to this is the war side in which the people go against each other in hopes of winning nothing but pride. It must be taken into consideration that this was …show more content…

We can thank Ancient Greece for changing the ways of thinking of many. Ancient Greece emphasized heavily on logic and the morality of people. In this period, Greeks experimented with new characteristics of art that were never attempted before. I consider Ancient Greek art to be unique because it made complex ideas appear simple. We see a realness to statues of people. I will use Diskobolos as an example. There is such attention to detail of the human body that it looks as if there is a guy trying to throw a disk. In Ancient Greece, the concept of weight shifting in statues was introduced as contrapposto. Diskobolos contains some weight shifting, but the proportionality of his arm and the arched body is the attraction here. The Greeks wanted to focus on the human body as a sane body and soul. They captured emotions in their statutes because every has a story. The Greeks promoted ideas of democracy, liberty, and individual rights. In juxtaposition to other civilizations, Ancient Greek was the less barbaric one. Everything in Ancient Greece made sense because logic was behind everything. The Parthenon was proportional so the columns would decrease as the structure got longer. Since everything was backed up mathematically, statutes appear more vivid because they are not lopsided like in the previous civilizations. The successes of Ancient Greece serve as an explanation to why they were able to prosper

Open Document