Comparing Poems 'Hope For Animals And Their World'

705 Words2 Pages

People interact with nature in an overall positive way. “Carry” by Linda Hogan, “Hope for Animals and their World” by Jane Goodall, and “My Life as a Bat” by Margaret Atwood prove this interaction. People might argue that humans interact with nature in a negative way because of “My Life as a Bat” and how it shows that people don’t appreciate creepy bats. However, people interact positively with nature as shown in “Carry,” love and friendship makes up our connection with nature in this poem. “Hope for Animals and their World” shows Lou’s way of keeping burying beetles alive and why they are important, this is a positive connection so the beetles don’t die, and keep our environment clean.
The poem, “Carry” by Linda Hogan shows nature being positive by, no one ever being alone. The water in this poem symbolizes togetherness, it contains so much and is a part to everything. “Water is never lonely,/ it holds so many” (Hogan 22-23). The water has so much strength to move and feed everyone, it …show more content…

“Hope for Animals and their World” by Jane Goodall is a text about insects having a positive benefit of living in the environment. “This returns nutrients to the earth, which stimulates the growth of plants” (Goodall 63). If beetles aren’t saved carcasses and flies will increase, beetles are useful for recycling and decaying animals. Goodall introduces Lou Perret as a speaker to save the beetles so they can stay alive and help the environment. Lou says, “if only people would take the time to listen, retain the curiosity and wonder of childhood, how much richer their lives would be” (Goodall 66). He is trying to change humans opinions and is explaining how if people would take a step back and realize how useful these burying beetles are they would understand why Jane and Lou are trying to save them. This text shows a positive interaction between humans, animals, and the

Open Document