Comparing Jesus In Hero's Journey And Ordinary Virtues

588 Words2 Pages

Sidney made the case in her presentation that it is necessary for a character or person to complete a resurrection, whether in a literal death and rebirth scene or in a more figurative sense, if they are to be considered a hero. Jesus, according to both Webster and Sidney, is the ultimate figure of resurrection and is a hero who fulfills the requirements listed in both The Writer’s Journey and Tolkien’s Ordinary Virtues. He also follows the Hero’s Journey as laid out by Campbell. Due to this, He is the model to which we should hold other heroes, including heroes of the faith throughout the Bible. Many heroes of the faith clearly model themselves off of Sydney’s hypothesis, through either purposeful or inadvertent modeling of Jesus as well as a, typically identifiable resurrection scene. This was particularly evident in some characters, such as Moses, Paul, and …show more content…

Jesus, Himself, uses Jonah as a sign of His death, “For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of a huge fish, so the Son of Man will be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.” Upon being swallowed, Jonah died and, once he was spit up, he was reborn and willing to carry out God’s mission. While he may not have grown in his understanding of God’s love towards the Ninevites, it is undeniable that the experience did change him. Paul’s death and resurrection arguably shows the most obvious change of heart of those I chose. He was introduced as a great enemy and persecutor of the young church, filled with loathing towards Christians. I believe that Jesus speaking to Paul and blinding him was the moment of his death. For three days he was blind, the length of which points to Christ once more, until Ananias came to Paul, healed his sight, and prayed that he would receive the Holy Spirit. From that point on, Paul was resurrected and made new, into a person utterly different and dependent on the

Open Document