Comparing Emerson And Thoreau

1458 Words3 Pages

What is nature? It is the phenomena of the physical world collectively, including plants, animals, the landscape, and other features and products of the earth, as opposed to humans or human creations. What is the connection between human and nature? You might not notice the significance of it, but by reading Ralph Waldo Emerson’s Nature, Self-Reliance, and Henry David Thoreau’s Walden from “Where I Lived, and What I Lived For” and Civil Disobedience, you would realize that human cannot live without nature. According to Emerson and Thoreau, nature is a living character through which human identity is constructed either through the characters’ alignment with the natural world or their struggle against it.

Nature by Emerson
“Strictly speaking, therefore, all that is separate from us, all which Philosophy distinguishes as the NOT ME, that is, both nature and art, all other men and my own body, must be ranked under this name, NATURE.”
This quote summarizes in a …show more content…

Similarly, since every outside of the soul is nature – including society – this reflects how nature influences human perception. This is the connection between nature and the soul. Consistency represents a constant in society, a repetition in thoughts and behaviors that always persisted through time. This seemed liked an unnatural recurrence, meaning a concept that does not apply to natural world: trees and organisms evolved, and nature never follow a specific pattern, or quoted Emerson: “spontaneous impression.” By clashing with both, Emerson illustrated and intricate web of connection between nature and soul, closely

Open Document