How Does One Find the Miraculous in the Common?

1202 Words3 Pages

How does one find the miraculous in the common? Associated with spontaneous wonders, miraculous is far from the ordinary. This is a sound comparison, although Transcendentalist poet Ralph Waldo Emerson would call the previous statement a fallacy. This is due to his belief of finding the miraculous in the common as “the invariable mark of wisdom”. Emerson along with Henry David Thoreau and Annie Dillard all answered in regards to finding such miracles. These three authors have displayed their reasoning in their popular works.
With the works of Self Reliance and Nature, Ralph Waldo Emerson defined how one would find the miraculous in the ordinary. Emerson does not pose what common miracles are but teaches the readers how to find the wonders themselves. In Self Reliance, Emerson stresses the importance of becoming a person with individual thought but not secluded in darkness. As he wrote, : “It is/easy in the world to live after the world’s opinion; it is easy in /solitude to live after our own; but the great man is he in the /midst of the crowd keeps with perfect sweetness the/ independence of solitude….” (34-38). In Emerson’s eyes, a true non-conformist is able to have their thoughts untouched in the world of opinions. Someone who possesses that quality is an independent thinker and alludes back to the title of Emerson’s poem. “Nature” places less emphasis on the idea of independent thinking and more on solitude in natural surroundings, a state Emerson explains as, “…a transparent eye-ball; I am nothing; I see all; the currents of the Universal Being circulate through me; I am part or particle of God.” To Emerson, nature is similar to personal bliss; a person can be distanced from life trifles and find tranquility within the ...

... middle of paper ...

...thought versus the ideals of the masses. Thoreau took Emerson’s ideas and transformed into an experiment in the woods that showcased the wonders of simplicity. Annie Dillard showed the importance of individual experiences from what Emerson and Thoreau tried to explain. All three authors took part in the answer of how one finds the miraculous in the common. By using nature as a muse, independent thinkers that abandon the realm of obsession and embrace simplicity are able to see these so called “common miracles”. However common miracles are meaningless unless one is able to experience the event firsthand, there are no words the to explain a true miracle. This is the final consensus from the remnants of writings these three author have left. The miraculous in the common is nothing more than common occurrences, but only ones who possesses the qualities to find it will.

Open Document