Compare And Contrast The Us Presidential And Us Prime Minister

742 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Comparison of presidential and parliamentary systems

Mentor Sahitaj Rrezart Dema Academic Writing 30 December 2017 US PRESIDENT VS UK PRIME MINISTER The United States President and United Kingdom Prime Minister are arguably the two most powerful elected leader in world. But we want to know who really is the most powerful. We are going to discuss and compare their powers. So we are going to learn their similarities and differences between them. Both the United States President and United Kingdom Prime Minister occupies a unique position not only in their respective political systems but also in the world as whole. The United States President is elected for 4 years. On the other hand, UK Prime Minister is elected for 5 years. The United States President cannot be removed before expiry of a period of 4 years unless impeached earlier by the Congress, but is a very difficult and impracticable procedure. Meanwhile, United Kingdom Prime Minister depends for his term of office …show more content…

The United States President derives all his powers from the constitution of the USA. While the United Kingdom Prime Minster derives his powers from constitutional conventions. All powers are vested in United Kingdom Monarch and the Prime Minister is appointed only to aid and advise the Monarch. We discussed their powers and compared them by their powers. We showed you how their candidature starts and what they do to be the head of their states. We talked about how they become Presidents, respectively Prime Ministers. We showed you what they can do and what they cannot. Furthermore, we talked about their cabinets. We showed you their strengths and weaknesses. Then we talked about where they lack in powers or who has more powers than the other one. In the end we showed you where their powers come from. Now we let you to decide about which one is more

Show More
Related

  • Compare And Contrast Johnson And Ronald Reagan

    442 Words  | 1 Pages

    Lyndon B. Johnson and Ronald Reagan have many difference in the government. Lyndon B. Johnson saying that congress role to promote “general welfare” to discover ways to improve government. Reagan called the war on poverty a failure and proposed budget to reduce spending social programs but increase the size of military. By compare and contrasting Lyndon B. Johnson’s speech on affirmative action with Ronald Reagan’s inaugural address can show the differences and alikeness in federal Government.

    Read More

  • Presidential Powers: A Comparsion of Predencies of George W. Bush and Barack Obama

    1036 Words  | 3 Pages

    As the President of the United States, a president have powers that other members of the government do not. Presidential power can be defined in numerous ways. Political scientists Richard Neustadt and William Howell give different views on what is presidential power. These polarized views of presidential powers can be used to compare and contrast the presidencies of George W. Bush and Barack Obama.

    Read More

  • POS 2041 Final

    843 Words  | 2 Pages

    Of the most powerful people in the world, the President of the United States of America hits the top of the list. Even though the policy agendas that presidents set as they take office often go unfulfilled, the office of President is still one of the most envied spots to have. But why could this be? It is because the United States is the most powerful nation in the world and with the President as the leader, he is said to have the most power in the world ("Top Ten Most Powerful Countries in the World"). With power comes responsibility and with this position he must govern a country while abiding by the rules.

    Read More

  • Comparison: William Jennings Bryan &Theodore Roosevelt

    605 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States has a long history of great leaders who, collectively, have possessed an even wider range of religious and political convictions. Perhaps not unexpectedly, their beliefs have often been in conflict with one another, both during coinciding eras, as well as over compared generations. The individual philosophies of William Jennings Bryan, Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, with regard to America’s roles in world affairs and foreign diplomacy; are both varied and conflicted. Despite those conflicts however, each leader has left his own legacy behind, in terms of how the U.S. continues to engage in world affairs today.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Jefferson And Harry S. Truman

    1805 Words  | 4 Pages

    There are few words in the English language that are difficult to define. Successful is one of those words considering everyone has their own definition of what it truly means to be successful in life. The word successful becomes even harder to define when paired with the word President. Every President had different qualities that made them successful during their terms. These qualities would be necessary in both times of peril and in times of peace. Americans tend to have a hard time trying to find the few genuinely successful presidents among the masses. Two Presidents that were truly successful were Thomas Jefferson and Harry S. Truman. These men had such an impact on politics on both the national and global levels. Jefferson and Truman

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Franklin Roosevelt And Hoover's Inaugural Address

    708 Words  | 2 Pages

    Oaths and promises were made by Franklin Roosevelt and Herbert Hoover in their inaugural addresses. Hoover and Roosevelt helped the country face the depression and transition into World War II. Both presidents’ inaugural addresses voiced concern and hope for the country. In their inaugural addresses, Hoover and Roosevelt expressed views about the future, the current situation, the challenges that were faced by our leaders, and how the Great Depression impacted the nation

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Roosevelt And Hoover

    621 Words  | 2 Pages

    As the United States became engulfed in the hardships of the Great Depression, a controversy regarding the Federal Government’s involvement with charity and relievement of suffering became apparent. Was it the Government’s responsibility to aid in relieving Americans of such misery? Or, was it the job of the People to work together to reach a solution? An analysis of the two presidents who took turn in office during the Great Depression, Franklin Roosevelt and Herbert Hoover, reveals their opposing perspectives and philosophies regarding this controversy, and subsequently, Roosevelt’s and Hoover’s contradicting views played a fundamental role in America’s rise out of the Great Depression and the nature of government in today’s society.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Presidents Johnson And Reagan

    1132 Words  | 3 Pages

    Presidents Johnson and Reagan led the United States in two very different eras, and have left much different legacies from their time in office. Their social policies while President were almost completely opposites. Johnson was focused on making social reforms to benefit all Americans, while Reagan wanted to lessen the aid given to those in poverty.

    Read More

  • Royal Murders by Dulcie M. Ashdown

    1137 Words  | 3 Pages

    When the term “monarch” is used, the first thing that comes to mind is a bombastic king and queen with unlimited power. The reality is, this is not always true. The definition of a monarch is “someone who is the head of a state government, either in reality or symbolically” (Nederman 2). Such a government is known as a monarchy. A monarch usually either inherits sovereignty by birth or is elected. Either way, a monarch typically rules for life or until abdication. Depending on the type of government in place, the “monarch’s true power varies from one monarchy to another” (Nederman 2). They may be complete tyrants, known as an absolute monarchy. On the other hand, they may be ceremonial heads of state who exercise little or no power and are only a figure head which is known as a constitutional monarchy (Nederman 2). These different types of governments have all been around for about the same amount of time. However, some are more renowned than others.

    Read More

  • Models Of Presidential Power

    2075 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Constitution lays out power sharing amongst the President and Congress. However the Constitution is not always clearly defined which leaves questions to how the laws should be interpreted and decisions implemented. There are three major models of presidential power within foreign policy; the first being the presidential model in which decisions abroad are made by the president and his or her top aides and advisors. This model is accepted amongst many because during times of urgency and crisis the president must make quick decisions. The president unlike congress is provided various sources of intelligence information, which is a benefit in analyzing situations globally and making sound decisions.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Presidential Power

    1184 Words  | 3 Pages

    Presidential power has become a hot topic in the media the in recent years. There has been extensive debate about what a president should be able to do, especially without the involvement of Congress and the American people. While this debate has become more publicized since the Bush administration, similar issues of presidential power date back to Truman and the Korean War. As with much of the structure of the U.S. government, the powers of the president are constantly evolving with the times and the executives.

    Read More

  • Presidential Powers Essay

    1931 Words  | 4 Pages

    In contrast, the Supreme Leader of Iran appoints key figures in the political system and not the president. 2. During these times, Obama and Rouhani do have the responsibilities to their countries, even though Obama does have more power by being the president of the United States. Other forms of informal powers are being used to make decisions without the approval of anyone else.

    Read More

  • A Comparison Of Theodore Roosevelt And Franklin Delano Roosevelt

    1427 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the United States of America, every four years, American citizens sit down and vote upon who they would like to be the new up and coming president. Citizens often debate on different aspects that would affect their presidencies, such as their domestic and foreign policies. The two past United States Presidents of Theodore Roosevelt and Franklin Delano Roosevelt are two presidents that are often compared on their different policies due to their family background. After realizing that the two are brothers, individuals often assume that the two are similar in their policies, while in fact, this is certainly not the case. While some Americans may believe that Theodore Roosevelt and Franklin Delano Roosevelt are similar in their presidencies

    Read More

  • Juan Linz The Perils Of Presidentialism Summary

    932 Words  | 2 Pages

    Debating which constitutional form of government best serves democratic nations is discussed by political scientist Juan Linz in his essay “The Perils of Presidentialism”. Linz compares parliamentary systems with presidential systems as they govern democracies. As the title of Linz’s essay implies, he sees Presidentialism as potentially dangerous. Linz points out the flaws as presidentialism as he sees them and sites rigidity of fixed terms, the zero-sum game and political legitimacy coupled with lack of incentive to form alliances as issues to support his theory that the parliamentary system is superior to presidentialism.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Royal Prerogative Powers

    1796 Words  | 4 Pages

    The United Kingdom as one of the remaining monarchies of the world, which head of it, the Queen Elizabeth II, has powers that provide an essential evolution of the country. These powers, are called Royal Prerogative powers. Obviously, British people respect the Royal family and additionally the queen, nevertheless they could have their own beliefs as seen on their references. According to the Royal Prerogative (“RP”), it is definitely the most historically and continuing tradition of Britain. In some situations, circumstances tend to disappear them and replaced them by other recent means. In this essay, it will define the RP and how can preserve the separation of powers. Therefore, it should explain how these powers dying to a democratic environment.

    Read More

More about Compare And Contrast The Us Presidential And Us Prime Minister

Open Document