Compare And Contrast The Patriots And The Loyalists

408 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: American revolution social and political

On the brink of revolution, the colonies were divided amongst themselves. Two factions with different ideologies “The Patriots” & and the “The Loyalist”, to know these factions we must first know another. Because both parties played a pivotal role in the “American Revolution”. The loyalist group was considered as the elite class of citizens they had money, education, land & and lived a lavish lifestyle. By the estimate considered by “John Adams in his personal journals in 1815 they were about twenty percent of loyalist in the colonies. They remained in favor or support of British and King George III”. They did not believe in independence from the British. They still believed themselves to be loyal British citizens. As far the Patriots are concerned, they were most citizens who wanted the revolution and freedom from the British. The Patriots were sick and tired of the British rule and their unfair treatment towards them. The Patriots …show more content…

Many historians and future generations simply referrers to them as traitors. Due to their act of cowardness, but however the main reasons for their departure was to maintain their extravagances lifestyle. The battle of Lexington and Concord was leading to a series of event that occurred earlier for example The French and Indian war on (1754-1763). The Sugar & Molasses Act (1764). The Stamp Act (1765), The Townshend Act (1767), The Boston Massacre (1770) in which the British Troops shot and killed citizens of Boston, And the Boston Tea Party incident (1773) in which “Samuel Adams” and his fellow men, Dump the Tea in the Boston Harbor. “The main goal of British troops was to capture rebel leaders Sam Adams & John Hancock”. As well as to abolish their weapons and ammunition. However, the horse rider warned the colonist “Paul Revere” and the militia was able hide their ammunition and weapons. Thus, also allowing Samuel Adams and John Hancock to

Show More
Related

  • Radicalism Gary B Nash Summary

    723 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nash’s argument regarding to how the American Revolution portrayed “radicalism” throughout the American Revolution has been supported from the previous pieces of evidence. Moreover, the pieces of evidence listed to support Gary B. Nash’s argument are supported in embodying the true manner on how the American colonists fought to let go of their submission with the British and try to throw down Parliaments Policies. The evidence presented illustrate how the radical-lower class politics erupted to other citizens that favored British policies and caused riots that led to the account for the Revolution itself. The issues regarding to how these radical-lower class demanded British favorites demonstrated how far reaching the people would go to demolish but historically demonstrate their pride and purpose in freeing themselves from Parliament rule. These evidential claims help proclaim what argument Nash is making suggesting that radicalism was performed indeed to a very extreme point but rather to an effective point in which led to the creation of the American

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Unknown American Revolution

    1147 Words  | 3 Pages

    They were the people who actively participated and sacrificed their lives. Therefore the side they chose to fight on was heavily influenced by their “local interests, grudges, and unfulfilled yearnings [Page 87].”In summary, poor farmers, wanted political rights and land. For slaves they yearned for freedom. Women wanted to have the same rights as men. Native Americans wanted the colonists to stop encroaching on their land. Many of these desires coincided while other clashed. Therein lay the chaos that drove the American Revolution. While many of the people did not succeed the ideas they fought for became deeply embedded into

    Read More

  • Gordon Wood’s Radicalism of the American Revolution

    1486 Words  | 3 Pages

    Gordon Wood’s Radicalism of the American Revolution is a book that extensively covers the origin and ideas preceding the American Revolution. Wood’s account of the Revolution goes beyond the history and timeline of the war and offers a new encompassing look inside the social ideology and economic forces of the war. Wood explains in his book that America went through a two-stage progression to break away from the Monarchical rule of the English. He believes the pioneering revolutionaries were rooted in the belief of an American Republic. However, it was the radical acceptance of democracy that was the final step toward independence. The transformation between becoming a Republic, to ultimately becoming a democracy, is where Wood’s evaluation of the revolution differs from other historians. He contributes such a transformation to the social and economic factors that faced the colonists. While Gordon Wood creates a persuasive argument in his book, he does however neglect to consider other contributing factors of the revolution. It is these neglected factors that provide opportunity for criticism of his book.

    Read More

  • Loyalist V.S Patriots Analysis

    849 Words  | 2 Pages

    Great Britain and the new world should be together because we are not ready to be on our own and we need their protection. I am a loyalist because the king has grown control over us and now we owe our royalty to the king. We have fought in the French and Indian war and the British won. Now British has control over us. It is important to show the king loyalty because of the protection we are given and loyalists want to remain a part of Britain.

    Read More

  • Revolutionary War: The Battles of Lexington and Concord

    944 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Battle of Concord was the first serious conflict of the Revolutionary War. It again was fought on the same day as the battle of Lexington, April 19, 1775. The colonists had failed to stop the British, but they got reinforcements. when the British got to Concord, there was no equipment to be taken. It was a decoy and the British had been tricked. When they turned around to head back, they were faced with the Colonial army to fight. The colonial army won and the American Revolutionary War had begun.

    Read More

  • William Franklin: Traitor? Patriot?

    2379 Words  | 5 Pages

    The conflict between Benjamin Franklin and his only living son is a microcosm of the little-understood clash between those Americans who strived for independence from British occupation and those that felt the country was either not or never would be ready for self-governance. Benjamin Franklin felt strongly enough about his son’s actions to label them betrayal; William Franklin felt strongly enough about the foolhardiness of the Revolution to suffer his father’s wrath. The actions of the loyalists are understood by Americans to constitute treason, but this is a simplification. Many loyalists felt that r...

    Read More

  • Patripts and Loyalists During the Revolutionary War, Questions and Answers

    2324 Words  | 5 Pages

    ...re having an argument that caused a crowd to gather around them. Soon, the crowd grew irritated and started throwing objects at the troops. The British fired aimlessly into the air but accidentally killed five colonists. This started the Boston Massacre. Three years later, Parliament passed the Tea Act, which was an act that made colonists pay a tax whenever they bought tea. This act angered the colonists but also made them more united. On December 16, 1773, the colonists dressed up as Mohawk Indians, took over British ships, and dumped all their tea overboard into the Boston Harbor. This was called the Boston Tea Party. These among many other British-American conflicts were the building blocks leading to the revolutionary war.

    Read More

  • The Five Most Influential People in American History

    1255 Words  | 3 Pages

    in the Revolutionary group opposing the British measures that were to lead to the American Revolution.

    Read More

  • Boston Massacre

    992 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Boston Massacre is considered by many historians to be the first battle of the Revolutionary War. The fatal incident happened on March 5 of 1770. The massacre resulted in the death of five colonists. British troops in the Massachusetts Bay Colony were there to stop demonstrations against the Townshend Acts and keep order, but instead they provoked outrage. The British soldiers and citizens brawled in streets and fought in bars. “The citizens viewed the British soldiers as potential oppressors, competitors for jobs, and a treat to social mores'; (Mahin 1). A defiant anti-British fever was lingering among the townspeople.

    Read More

  • Patriots Vs Loyalists Research Paper

    650 Words  | 2 Pages

    There has been rumors that a man named Benjamin Franklin gave advice to the general that the French would try and ambush him, but general Braddock was used to fighting the Europeans and he didn’t think the french would. Another famous loyalist is Benedict Arnold who was a general of the continental army who went to fight for the british.According to historic Valley Forge "Arnold was one of a number of Benedict Arnolds including an early governor of Rhode Island and his father.” There was a few good loyalists and these were some of them. were some loyalists and if you’re not familiar with loyalists they were the people who still wanted to stay part of the british and stay in their government

    Read More

  • Summary: American Loyalists

    1387 Words  | 3 Pages

    Historians concerned with American Loyalists during the second half of the eighteenth century have produced two brands of scholarship that encompass the broad, disjointed Loyalist narrative. The first juxtaposes the Loyalists in America with the Patriot rebels within the framework of numerous burgeoning American movements increasingly bent on the separation of certain areas from the British Empire and the removal of their communities from the dominion of British Parliament and the Crown. This particular framework places Loyalists in a political environment characterized by various forms of separatism coupled with a decentralized network of rebel governments known as Committees of Correspondence. These Committees of Correspondence in charge

    Read More

  • The Contribution of Benjamin Franklin to The American Revolution

    2167 Words  | 5 Pages

    When American colonists began to vie for freedom in 1775, Benjamin Franklin had many reasons for supporting the revolution. At first, however, he made no comment on which side he supported. In truth, he was waiting to publicize his opinion until he could convert two loyalists who were very dear to him. First was his longtime friend and ally Joseph Galloway. Second was his own son, William Franklin. Ben...

    Read More

  • Analysis of 1776, by David McCullough

    972 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...e gun, it seemed, the greater the owner‘s pride in it.” (McCullough 33) The Continental army certainly did not look like an army yet these people were brought together in this fight for freedom and prevailed even winning the support of Americans who had no hope the British would be defeated.” Merchant Erving had sided with the Loyalists primarily because he thought the rebellion would fail. But the success of Washington‘s army at Boston had changed his mind as it had for many” (McCullough 108). The reader must comprehend the power of this accomplishment for the rag-tag army. “Especially for those who had been with Washington and who knew what a close call it was at the beginning-how often circumstance, storms, contrary winds, the oddities or strengths of individual character had made the difference- the outcome seemed little short of a miracle.” (McCullough 294).

    Read More

  • The Arguments of Thomas Paine and James Chalmers Over the Revolutionary War

    735 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Revolutionary War was one of America’s earliest battles and one of many. Although, many came to America to gain independence from Great Britain many still had loyalty for the King and their laws. Others believed that America needs to be separated from Great Britain and control their own fate and government. I will analyze the arguments of Thomas Paine and James Chalmers. Should America be sustained by Great Britain or find their own passage?

    Read More

  • Personal Narrative: The First American Revolutionary War

    535 Words  | 2 Pages

    Its 1777, in Boston Massachusetts a small skirmish between the british and a band of poor colonial states calling themselves the Americans has blown up into a global war. The mighty royal British forces with the help of the Hashians have invaded America and the Britishes arch enemy the French have just entered the war on the american side. With all this going on the newly formed american side is is dealing with issues from within. There are three factions in on the american side the patriots who are fighting for independence and liberty, the neutralist who just want to be left alone and think there's no problem with the current state of the colonies, and the Loyalist who still believe in rule by the crown and believe that the patriots are a lost cause. Im Major General Horatio Gates of the Colonial American Army, Commander of the Northern District.

    Read More

More about Compare And Contrast The Patriots And The Loyalists

Open Document