Analysis of 1776, by David McCullough

972 Words2 Pages
David McCullough author of 1776 puts faces and feelings to the events of the Revolutionary war making this an exciting novel even when the ending is known. Acting as a companion to an earlier work of McCullough’s, John Adams, 1776 is a strictly military view of the era versus political. Although the reader may have to get accustomed to the vast amount of characters introduced McCullough makes sure that those you are supposed to remember you will. Every character introduced is described incredibly well and throughout the novel you begin to feel as if you know the character and are going through the battle with them, specifically General George Washington with whom the reader emphasizes constantly with throughout the war. With the great description of the characters and events we feel as if we are there and in doing this the author creates understanding, the reader by knowing all sides and characters’ personalities the feels they know why the Revolution happened the way it did. McCullough seems to have little bias when the novel begins with the introduction of King George the third. Still youthful at thirty seven, and still hardworking after fifteen years on the thrown, he could be notably willful and often shortsighted, but he was sincerely patriotic and everlasting duty-bound.” ( McCullough 6). The description of the King showed a side of the Revolution many do not think of. Often the British are just thought of as the enemy in red, not so much people who the war affected greatly, whose lives were also lost fighting for their country. The British and King George the third had reason, some may not agree, but it was valid from their point of view. David McCullough manages to open the readers mind to the differ... ... middle of paper ... ...e gun, it seemed, the greater the owner‘s pride in it.” (McCullough 33) The Continental army certainly did not look like an army yet these people were brought together in this fight for freedom and prevailed even winning the support of Americans who had no hope the British would be defeated.” Merchant Erving had sided with the Loyalists primarily because he thought the rebellion would fail. But the success of Washington‘s army at Boston had changed his mind as it had for many” (McCullough 108). The reader must comprehend the power of this accomplishment for the rag-tag army. “Especially for those who had been with Washington and who knew what a close call it was at the beginning-how often circumstance, storms, contrary winds, the oddities or strengths of individual character had made the difference- the outcome seemed little short of a miracle.” (McCullough 294).
Open Document