Compare And Contrast Miller And Slocombe

769 Words2 Pages

“Preparing Students for the New Reality” was written by college professors Donald S. Miller and Thomas E. Slocombe in the College Student Journal in March of 2012. This paper was written to explain how changes in education in the United States had led to poor student performance, why graduates are not prepared for the competitive and constantly developing workforce, and how to steer students into maturity and work-readiness. Miller and Slocombe provide examples as to why students are not properly prepared for today’s “new reality”, defined by the authors as “hypercompetition in a global marketplace”. Both authors also encourage strategies for reversing the current situation of student unpreparedness, mainly for teachers and mentors working …show more content…

Both authors aim to raise awareness of the issues that millennial students could potentially face due to feelings of entitlement, unrealistic expectations, and poor academic performance. Miller and Slocombe blame millennial’s feelings and expectations on overparenting and “helicopter parents”. Compared to earlier generations, millennials were raised by more protective and coddling parents who aimed to boost their child’s self-esteem and confidence, perhaps more than necessary. The authors argue that this inflation of self-esteem brought on by parents is contributing to disapproval from employers. Millennials are said by Miller and Slocombe to feel “entitled to attractive employment”. The effective reasoning that Miller and Slocombe provide towards millennial entitlement argues that Generation Y is doomed in the workforce if they continue with the attitudes encouraged by parents and mentors. Miller and Slocombe acknowledge the decrease in students’ academic performance, and partly blame the decline on student’s feelings of “intellectual superiority”. Including this information on declining academic performance strengthens both authors’ arguments as to how students will not be prepared for the workforce, as it would be hard to succeed in college with poor academic …show more content…

The authors suggest that the low salary paid to teachers in the United States contributes to low expectations in instruction and a decrease in desire towards teaching jobs. By including this argument, Miller and Slocombe encourage that paying teachers a more attractive salary could improve students’ academic performance. Miller and Slocombe suggest structuring classrooms like businesses by introducing real-world interactions, providing incentives and constructive feedback, and encouraging students to be “effective team members”. These strategies suggested by the authors show that the authors care about the situation at hand, and that they aren’t just writing a negative essay. Providing meaningful strategies for readers to improve their situation connects the authors to the readers, establishing trust and a personal

Open Document