Compare And Contrast: Lord Of The Flies

616 Words2 Pages

Compare and Contrast: Lord of the Flies book and movie

Is the book version better or is the movie version better? Because movies often change things from the book either for making the details stronger and more reasonable or for catching the audiences’ eyeball, this discussion never ends. For example, the older version of the movie of Lord of the Flies is slightly different from the original book version.

One of the first differences happened when Jack and his hunters went on hunting instead of guarding the fire. The smoke from the fire is the key for ships and planes to notice them and take them to a safe place. The fire soon went out after Jack and his hunters left. Of course, a chance of getting rescued arrived quietly during this short …show more content…

This is easy to understand, though, because planes are usually faster than ships, so by the time Ralph arrived at the fire pit, the plane had gone out of sight. This speed is a little fast for a ship. Another difference is, before this even took place, there was a fire which burnt a part of the forest mentioned in the book. A kid even got killed during it because he went back to the forest. Piggy noticed the fire first while he’s giving the tirade was the reason why the boys started making shelters. However, the movie cut the entire scene out of the script—it did not happen. Nor did Ralph and Jack debate about “who were supposed to build the shelters and who actually built them”. Ralph, the representative of civilization, told Jack, the representation of wildness, even though they need shelters badly, nobody saw the point of it and participated in the building. Jack argued the hunters—he—wanted meat. This developed more hatred from Jack to Ralph. The movie cut out many small parts from the book like that, but one major section the movie left out was the talk between the “Lord of the Flies” and Simon. He went back to the mountains because he didn’t believe in the beast,

Open Document