More handpicked essays just for you.
The spread of communism in eastern europe during the cold war
Impact of the Cold War on international relations
Impact of the Cold War on international relations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
After the end of World War 2 Churchill realized, that Stalin had gained control of a large portion of Asia, and now was trying to spread the ideals Communism. Churchill saw this as not only a threat to the United States and Great Britain, but also as a possible threat of a future war, between the English speaking world and Russia. Something that he desperately wanted to prevent.
Stalin on the other hand, saw the expansion of Communism, as the only right, after all hadn’t most of those who’d died during the world war come from Russia.
Now, while I agree that Russia deserved some compensation for what they had done during the war, I believe that out of the two of them Churchill who had past history on his side was right.
Some historians say that it was the Fulton speech of former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill on Iron Curtain that induced the Soviet Union to push for t...
Stalin was ruthless and created a totalitarian state during the 1930s, causing enormous suffering. The result was a form of totalitarianism that was more advanced than that of Hitler's Nazi Germany. Stalin was in control of internal developments and pursued a foreign policy for Russia. These occasionally caused changes in tactics, or a strategy of dividing the Western powers. (Bullock, Allan) Due to these developments, and despite the suffering of Russia's own population, the Soviet Union was able to inflict defeat on Nazi Germany. This followed a disastrous initial response, in which Stalin didn't know what Hitler's intentions were. But Stalin's subsequent recovery interacted with long-term economic and military preparation for the Soviet Union. As a result of eventual victory, Stalin's position was greatly strengthened. He was therefor...
Great leaders are found on both sides of history, the good side and the bad. Winston Churchill and Adolf Hitler were both good leaders, even though they were on different sides of the war. Churchill and Hitler, although very different were both effective leaders because they evaluate and understand the other side’s strengths and weaknesses and are underestimated. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the opposing side is important during war because it means that one is able to use his opponent’s weaknesses against him during war, whether it is military or political. For example, Hitler was very good at using his opponents’ weaknesses against them, and this is evident by how fast he was able to invade Europe. The magnitude of Hitler’s
Though not at first seeing the threat that Adolph Hitler posed when he rose to power in 1933, Churchill gradually became a leading advocate for British rearmament. By 1938, as Germany began controlling its neighbors, Churchill had become a staunch critic of British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's policy of appeasement toward the Nazis.
There have been many dictators through out history that have shaped the way we look at them now. Sometimes it’s the way that dictators came to power that people judge them on. Sometimes it’s how long they stayed in power, but it’s not just how long they stayed in power. It’s what they did to stay in power. These two men are some of the most infamous dictators for those reasons alone. These men are Joseph Stalin and Fidel Castro, and they played a huge part in shaping the way we look at dictators today.
When most people hear the name Joseph Stalin, they usually associate the name with a man who was part of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and was responsible for the deaths of millions of people. He was willingly to do anything to improve the power of the Soviet Union’s economy and military, even if it meant executing tens of millions of innocent people (Frankforter, A. Daniel., and W. M. Spellman 655). In chapter three of Sheila Fitzpatrick’s book, Everyday Stalinism, she argues that since citizens believed the propaganda of “a radiant future” (67), they were able to be manipulated by the Party in the transformation of the Soviet Union. This allowed the Soviet government to expand its power, which ultimately was very disastrous for the people.
...t was because of Churchill that Great Britain and the rest of society were able to overcome World War II. Also, he did not demand for followers, but gained them through his inspirational words. Near the end of the war on November 9, 1942, Winston Churchill gave a speech, one that would go down in history. He said, “Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.”
Churchill was active in both administrative and diplomatic functions in prosecuting the British War effort. Some of his most important speeches are given in this era, and are for stimulating British morale during these periods of hardship. In his 1946 speech in the USA, he warned of the continued danger from the powerful Soviet Russia. In 1951, he was re-elected for a second term but was very unfit for the term, having to conduct business from his bed.
Stalin put forward an opposite theory - the theory of Socialism in One Country. He argued that the USSR must always come first in the government's plans. The rest of the world must take second place. The Communists should concentrate on building up the economy of the USSR, not waste money on helping revolutionary groups abroad....
When Winston Churchill became Prime Minister of England, it was during the beginning of the Second World War. After he gave his famous speech “Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat”, most of the reactions to his audience were divided among the audience he was giving it to. His speech was so motivating and persuasive because of his strong usage of rhetorical devices. He repeats questions throughout his speech to make the people he is speaking to really think about what he is asking. Churchill directs his speech more to the House of Commons than he did to anyone else. He wants his audience to understand what he is saying and show them that he has what it takes to lead his country to a victory.
As Lukas wrote, “Churchill understood something that not many people understand even now. The greatest threat to Western civilization was not Communism. It was National Socialism.” Churchill was a modern Nostradamus in his prophetic wisdom. He became a better leader because “the mind of an historian and courage of a soldier.” He understood history patterns really well and was willing to take the risk by informing people of facts they didn’t want to hear. Churchill refused repercussion or allowed euphemistic language to blind him. He led with unembellished facts.
Winston Churchill helped save the world from the Nazi’s while writing magnificent literature. “He also issued warnings of the threat from Nazi Germany that went unheeded, in part because of his past political and military misjudgments. When World War 2 broke out (Sept., 1939), Neville Chamberlain appointed him first lord of the admiralty. The following May, When Chamberlain was forced to resign, Churchill became Prime Minister” (Sir Winston Leonard). Winston Churchill knew that the Nazi’s were a threat, but foolishly, nobody cared what he had to say. What he did was right, and he had great reason to do it.
Even as members of his own party tried to convince him to appease Hitler and surrender, he would not. The Nazi war machine was going to come for the United Kingdom, if not immediately after it defeated the Soviet Union, and this was a fact that Churchill acknowledged. The appeasement sentiment was detained by Churchill, who thought “an appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last” (Appeasement Quotes). This is a display of a trait that Churchill was known for; his legendary wit. Being a master a conversation, Churchill used his wit to make righteous indignation of his political opposition. Continuing his war effort even when things were bleak and support waned led to the eventual defeat of one of the most dangerous ideologies in the history of the
Hitler and Stalin both caused the biggest mass murders in history, both had the same aims, and both hated each other, because of their different political views - one was National Socialist and one Communist - and this is probably the most important difference.
“Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm. If you're going through hell, keep going. You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.” (Winston Churchill). Every leader in Europe challenged by Adolf Hitler had either back down or been conquered but the new British Prime Minister stood tall. Although he was one man, Winston Churchill saved Europe; He was and is a great inspiration and without him, the war would’ve been lost.