College Debate Analysis

722 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: First amendment essay questions

On Thursday, February 18th at 4:00 pm I attended my first ever debate at California State University of Northridge, in Manzanita Hall 230. I had always been interested in debate but never came around to diving deeply into the topic. Seeing this class option as I signed up for spring term classes got me excited and interested in learning more about this field, and as I entered the Aronstam Library on Thursday, I felt even more excitement and intrigue because I felt that even though I wasn't debating, my fellow audience members and I were participating and learning. I learned a lot at this event and it was very interesting to see how the two teams worked together and also apart to formulate their ideas, how they state their claims, reasons and values, I also really liked studying their styles of discourse. The debate topic was, 'political correctness and american sensitivity towards it.' There were two teams, Chinese and American. The Chinese team were the first to present their argument and they had claimed that americans are too sensitive towards political correctness, they stressed specifically to domestic relations in colleges and that campuses should be less sensitive to topics, so they can provide a platform for ideas to grow and for people to learn and that the negativity towards …show more content…

They believe examples like this show the use of the first amendment. The American team kept flip flopping between their claims, at a few points they said americans are not sensitive enough and another they said they had agreed with their opponents, which made their argument incoherent towards the

Show More
Related

  • Creon Debate Analysis

    496 Words  | 1 Pages

    Creon’s ruling and application of his law in regards to Antigone should remain, because going back on his word would lead to anarchy, Antigone needs to be taught to obey law to preserve order, and the Creon is not disrespecting the gods as he is allowing them the final decision. To begin with, if Creon were to go back on his ruling and “bend” as his son, Haimon, recommends, then he would be endorsing the principle that laws have exceptions. Antigone went strictly against his predetermined wishes that no one was to bury Polynices; by absolving her, he would be saying that his laws are not final. Creon declares, “This [anarchy] is why cities tumble and great houses rain down… We keep laws then” (Sophocles

    Read More

  • Culture of Critique

    950 Words  | 2 Pages

    Americans have embraced debate since before we were a country. The idea that we would provide reasoned support for any position that we took is what made us different from the English king. Our love of debate came from the old country, and embedded itself in our culture as a defining value. Thus, it should not come as a surprise that the affinity for debate is still strong, and finds itself as a regular feature of the mainstream media. However, if Deborah Tannen of the New York Times is correct, our understanding of what it means to argue may be very different from what it once was; a “culture of critique” has developed within our media, and it relies on the exclusive opposition of two conflicting positions (Tannen). In her 1994 editorial, titled “The Triumph of the Yell”, Tannen claims that journalists, politicians and academics treat public discourse as an argument. Furthermore, she attempts to persuade her readers that this posturing of argument as a conflict leads to a battle, not a debate, and that we would be able to communicate the truth if this culture were not interfering. This paper will discuss the rhetorical strategies that Tannen utilizes, outline the support given in her editorial, and why her argument is less convincing than it should be.

    Read More

  • Jersey Boys State Reflection

    518 Words  | 2 Pages

    Because of this, I was selected to Party Secretary and, along with three other appointees, was left to organize the debate. The four of us worked tirelessly, and on the day of the debate, it payed off. It is one of my prouder honors to say that that we four appointees had kept five hundred of our peer organized and in check throughout an entire two hour long political debate. Looking back on this, I realized how much I learned from the experience. I had learned to succeed but I had also learned to fail. I overcame a discouraging loss and ultimately made it farther than I think I would have had I won the senatorial election. I also learned to work with others. Those three appointees and I were given a task that would have been impossible to do alone. However, through collaboration and hard work, we were able to pull it off, surprising even ourselves. All that I learned about myself that week has helped my through life since, and I believe it will allow me to succeed at Penn

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Dispute

    943 Words  | 2 Pages

    The University Playhouse’s performance of The Dispute displayed a conglomeration of Greek, Elizabethan, and French Neoclassical staging conventions. This comedy balanced out elements of presentational theatre and non-localized sets reminiscent of Greek theatre with representational theatre and localized sets resonant of Elizabethan theatre. The presence of elements of comedy, Farce, Satire, and the use of deus ex machina within the play utilized French Neoclassical staging conventions adopted from earlier Greek, Elizabethan, and Italian Renaissance conventions. In the following sections, I will discuss the reminiscence of these conventions embraced through this production of The Dispute.

    Read More

  • Deconstructing the Argument Culture: A Critical Exploration

    340 Words  | 1 Pages

    In her article “The Argument Culture,” professor of linguistics and author Deborah Tannen believes that we have collapsed into a society where arguing, criticizing, and debating is the solution to every problem. Tannen introduces this idea of society as the “argument culture”. The argument culture is a way of life that settles on the belief that the best way to get things done is to oppose everything. The way we freely and blatantly express problems is one of our society’s greatest strengths. People tend to express their beliefs and automatically expect someone to reply with their own view, therefore turning into an argument as to why each side is right and the other is wrong. We tend to look at both sides of an argument to side with the one

    Read More

  • The Great Debaters: The Wiley College Debate Team

    1446 Words  | 3 Pages

    Conflict is inevitable in any personal relationship or among members of any group. While we encounter many types of conflict in our lifetime, we often look for ways to avoid conflict. So, why do we run away from dealing with our conflict? It is often because many of us fear the conflict will escalate into a situation we will not be able to sustain. “As conflicts escalate, they go through certain incremental transformations. Although these transformations occur separately on each side, they affect the conflict as a whole because they are usually mirrored by the other side. As a result of these transformations, the conflict is intensified in ways that are sometimes exceedingly difficult to undo” (Pruitt, and Kim 89). We see many of these intense moments of escalating conflict throughout the story of The Great Debaters. The Great Debaters is based on a true story of three African-American students faced with the escalating conflict of racism in the 1930’s, with their English College Professor, Melvin B. Tolson bringing them together to create the first African-American debate team.

    Read More

  • The Great Debate

    738 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the Second Industrial Revolution two philosophies combated each other on a global scale. Laissez-Fair economics had ruled for the last few centuries and had created many prosperous nations but abuses of power by wealthy men had turned public opinion against it. Ever since its creation, Socialism begged to be placed head to head with Capitalism and it had finally gotten its chance. Laissez-Fair economics and Socialism both have their pros and cons when implemented in society. The battle between these two ideological works its way throughout society alternating between the protests and debates in the U.S. today to the great terror of the Cold War.

    Read More

  • The Presidential Debate: A Speech Of The Presidential Speech

    755 Words  | 2 Pages

    This speech is the Presidential debate which took place in New York in the University of Hofstra on September 26th 2016. In this speech I will be analyzing Hilary Clinton.

    Read More

  • Immigration and Border Security

    1203 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ol.” Debates on Immigration. Ed Judith Gans, Elaine M. Repogle, and Daniel J. Tichenor. Thousand Oaks, CA SAGE Reference, 2012: 144. Gale Virtual Library. Web. 22 Apr, 2014.

    Read More

  • The Civil Rights Act of 1964

    1836 Words  | 4 Pages

    Whalen, Charles and Barbara, The Longest Debate, Seven Locks Press, Washington D.C.:1985. Web. 3 July 2015.

    Read More

  • Trigger Fierce Debate

    1467 Words  | 3 Pages

    A spate of high-profile baby abandonments throughout the nation in recent years has led to a movement in some states to allow women to give away unwanted newborns at selected medical facilities.

    Read More

  • The Relationship Between Television and Presidential Elections

    2346 Words  | 5 Pages

    Katz, Elihu, and Jacob J. Feldman. (1962). The debates in the light of research: A survey of surveys. In The Great Debates, ed. Sidney Kraus. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 173-223.

    Read More

  • Miss Julie and Its Preface: The Foundation of a Critical Conflict

    3293 Words  | 7 Pages

    ...wledge our inquiry provides centers around the critical orientation of each voice sounded in the debate.

    Read More

  • The Presidential Debates

    1352 Words  | 3 Pages

    A picture is worth a thousand words. Get that picture played repeatedly over the news and it’s worth more than a thousand words; you gather the entire eyes, ears, and minds of a nation. The “great debate” of the Presidential Election for 2004 was well aware of the media power, understanding that there is a 24-news cycle available through TV, newspapers, and Internet. Those who wanted to remain ahead only had to use the media as their guinea pigs to twist out their favorable outcome. President Bush may be incumbent but his team behind the debate is not; John Kerry may be long-winded but his team behind the debate knows how to attract attention quickly. Both candidates may not have known what stage was being set October 4, 2004 but their campaign aids and analysts knew that in order to turn an American audience onto their side they knew manipulation of the media would turn into manipulation of the public.

    Read More

  • An Analysis Of Deborah Tannen's The Argument Culture

    1122 Words  | 3 Pages

    A mere question is how Tannen pulls the reader into her article titled “The Argument Culture.” Deborah Tannen uses multiple rhetorical devices such as language, logos, and imagery to explain in depth the “adversarial mindset” plaguing America and shows us her solution in the article “The Argument Culture”. Tannen wanted to inform Americans how argument based we truly are and persuade us to make change. Like I stated earlier Tannen begins this process by placing a question in our minds, “Balance. Debate. Listening to both sides. Who could question these Noble American traditions” (Tannen 403)? Tannen then structures her article to develop understanding of the concept among the uninformed. Ethos, Pathos, and Logos also play a key role in the description of the culture, but Tannen adds in real life examples and imagery to create mental

    Read More

More about College Debate Analysis

Open Document